JB/011/086/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/011/086/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>1829. Aug. 16</p> <head>Reformists reviewed</head> <p><note>Reformists classed</note></p> <p> <!-- figure in pencil --> (11 <note><unclear>Accomplishmenting</unclear><lb/> J.B.</note></p> <p> In this class should <del><gap/></del> <gap/> <add> not</add> present us as yet with<lb/> any more than one individual, this <gap/> will not form any decisive<lb/> objection: <!-- continues in margin --> the receptacle will<lb/> remain open ready at<lb/> all times for the receptacle<lb/> of as many<lb/> individuals as can<lb/> be found entitled to<lb/> be taken in it</p> <p> Looking about for this same approximation as can find<lb/> nothing <add>no one</add> nearer than this <del><gap/></del> <add> so often mentioned</add> Jeremy Bentham.</p> <p> That with a view <add>relation had</add> to this our purpose, he is no better<lb/> than a makeshift we <add><del><gap/></del><add> are <unclear>first</unclear> to</add> acknowledge and this on his grounds:<lb/> In the first place because those words <add>of his</add> in which his title to <del>the</del><lb/> appellation in question would have been those only possible grounds<lb/>are not yet <sic>compleated</sic>, in the next place because ever<lb/> were they even completed, he not having a crown in his hand,<lb/> in common nothing better than a scrap of a straw hat<lb/> they would not be faultless.  Now assuredly with all our partiality<lb/> were we <add>for such a purpose</add> to take <del>up</del> them up and examine them should<lb/> we find them so: though of such a multitude of persons<lb/> <add>in authority</add> when by his <gap/> those which men were ever more <gap/><lb/> or more galling he has for such a multitude of years <add> during so long a <unclear>career</unclear></add> been<lb/> provoking to retaliation <add> by no one</add> either retaliation or so much as <lb/> self-defence has been attempted.</p> <p> Of all the abovementioned ramifications not one<lb/> is there that is not familiar to him.  Not one is there<lb/> in which he was not made progress, not only in the <gap/> <add> <gap/></add><lb/> of the whole but in the preparation of the <del><gap/></del> <lb/> remedy; not one is there in which he has not <add>already</add> done<lb/> more than all other men taken together, as give design<lb/> than all other men taken together</p> <p> Now as to the second ramification taken in this<lb/> order.  1. Constitutional Law.  On this part of the field<lb/> he has obviously <gap/> a system: and that system all-comprehensive. <note>Ch 1 Hold notes of official<lb/> <gap/> <gap/>  &amp;c</note> <lb/> <del>This ha</del> At present however, <unclear>this facet</unclear> <lb/> excepted which belongs to the Judiciary Establishment, this branch<lb/> is not in the official <unclear>corpus</unclear>: <del>L</del> accordingly no <unclear>exhibits</unclear><lb/> in relation to it <del>or to</del> that same exception excepted, no exhibition is his opening.</p>  
<p>1829. Aug. 16</p> <head>Reformists reviewed</head> <p><note>Reformists classed</note></p> <p> <!-- figure in pencil --> (11 <note><unclear>Accomplishmenting</unclear><lb/> J.B.</note></p> <p> In this class should our research <add> not</add> present us as yet with<lb/> any more than one individual, this <gap/> will not form any decisive<lb/> objection: <!-- continues in margin --> the receptacle will<lb/> remain open ready at<lb/> all times for the receptacle<lb/> of as many<lb/> individuals as can<lb/> be found entitled to<lb/> be taken in it</p> <p> Looking about for this same approximation as can find<lb/> nothing <add>no one</add> nearer than this <del><gap/></del> <add> so often mentioned</add> Jeremy Bentham.</p> <p> That with a view <add>relation had</add> to this our purpose, he is no better<lb/> than a makeshift we <add><del><gap/></del><add> are <unclear>first</unclear> to</add> acknowledge and this on his grounds:<lb/> In the first place because those words <add>of his</add> in which his title to <del>the</del><lb/> appellation in question would have been those only possible grounds<lb/>are not yet <sic>compleated</sic>, in the next place because ever<lb/> were they even completed, he not having a crown in his hand,<lb/> in common nothing better than a scrap of a straw hat<lb/> they would not be faultless.  Now assuredly with all our partiality<lb/> were we <add>for such a purpose</add> to take <del>up</del> them up and examine them should<lb/> we find them so: though of such a multitude of persons<lb/> <add>in authority</add> when by his <gap/> those which men were ever more <gap/><lb/> or more galling he has for such a multitude of years <add> during so long a <unclear>career</unclear></add> been<lb/> provoking to retaliation <add> by no one</add> either retaliation or so much as <lb/> self-defence has been attempted.</p> <p> Of all the abovementioned ramifications not one<lb/> is there that is not familiar to him.  Not one is there<lb/> in which he was not made progress, not only in the <gap/> <add> <gap/></add><lb/> of the whole but in the preparation of the <del><gap/></del> <lb/> remedy; not one is there in which he has not <add>already</add> done<lb/> more than all other men taken together, as give design<lb/> than all other men taken together</p> <p> Now as to the second ramification taken in this<lb/> order.  1. Constitutional Law.  On this part of the field<lb/> he has obviously <gap/> a system: and that system all-comprehensive. <note>Ch 1 Hold notes of official<lb/> <gap/> <gap/>  &amp;c</note> <lb/> <del>This ha</del> At present however, <unclear>this facet</unclear> <lb/> excepted which belongs to the Judiciary Establishment, this branch<lb/> is not in the official <unclear>corpus</unclear>: <del>L</del> accordingly no <unclear>exhibits</unclear><lb/> in relation to it <del>or to</del> that same exception excepted, no exhibition is his opening.</p>  





Revision as of 18:45, 24 May 2018

Click Here To Edit

1829. Aug. 16

Reformists reviewed

Reformists classed

(11 Accomplishmenting
J.B.

In this class should our research not present us as yet with
any more than one individual, this will not form any decisive
objection: the receptacle will
remain open ready at
all times for the receptacle
of as many
individuals as can
be found entitled to
be taken in it

Looking about for this same approximation as can find
nothing no one nearer than this so often mentioned Jeremy Bentham.

That with a view relation had to this our purpose, he is no better
than a makeshift we <add> are first to acknowledge and this on his grounds:
In the first place because those words of his in which his title to the
appellation in question would have been those only possible grounds
are not yet compleated, in the next place because ever
were they even completed, he not having a crown in his hand,
in common nothing better than a scrap of a straw hat
they would not be faultless. Now assuredly with all our partiality
were we for such a purpose to take up them up and examine them should
we find them so: though of such a multitude of persons
in authority when by his those which men were ever more
or more galling he has for such a multitude of years during so long a career been
provoking to retaliation by no one either retaliation or so much as
self-defence has been attempted.

Of all the abovementioned ramifications not one
is there that is not familiar to him. Not one is there
in which he was not made progress, not only in the
of the whole but in the preparation of the
remedy; not one is there in which he has not already done
more than all other men taken together, as give design
than all other men taken together

Now as to the second ramification taken in this
order. 1. Constitutional Law. On this part of the field
he has obviously a system: and that system all-comprehensive. Ch 1 Hold notes of official
&c

This ha At present however, this facet
excepted which belongs to the Judiciary Establishment, this branch
is not in the official corpus: L accordingly no exhibits
in relation to it or to that same exception excepted, no exhibition is his opening.




Identifier: | JB/011/086/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-08-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

086

Info in main headings field

reformists reviewed

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

3783

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in