★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
< | <head>8 Aug. 1811 10<lb/> | ||
Fallacies</head> | |||
<note>Ch. Classification</note> | <note>Ch. Classification</note> | ||
<p>10</p> | <p>10</p> | ||
<p><del><add>Those</add> Placing <gap/> <gap/> <add><gap/> <gap/></add> fifth B. | <p><del><add>Those</add> Placing <gap/> <gap/> <add><gap/> <gap/></add> fifth B. where for the purposes of<lb/> | ||
<gap/> it required to be <gap/> | <gap/> it required to be <gap/> before B.</del></p> | ||
<note>20<lb/> | <note>20<lb/> | ||
Line 31: | Line 23: | ||
will be displayed to<lb/> | will be displayed to<lb/> | ||
best advantage</note> | best advantage</note> | ||
<p>In the classing of these fallacies <add>the force of</add> which seemed to direct <add>address</add> itself<lb/> | |||
<del>to the affections</del> <add>to the affections, together with those of which the force seemed to direct</add> <add>respectively to address</add><lb/> | |||
<add>itself to the imagination and the judgment</add>, the order which <del>seemed preferable on other</del><lb/> | |||
accounts <del>for the <gap/></del> for the marshalling of the<lb/> | |||
divisional titles <add>had they stood by</add> themselves would have <add>here have</unclear></add> been preferred<lb/> | |||
could not with advantage be given to the <add>portions of</add> matter<del>s</del><lb/> | |||
respectively contained <add>brought to view</add> under those heads.</p> | |||
<p>If of two portions <add>divisions</add> of matter one can not so well <add>there be one and but one which</add><lb/> | <p>If of two portions <add>divisions</add> of matter one can not so well <add>there be one and but one which</add><lb/> | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<del>regains</del> <add>claims</add> precedence by a title to which no<lb/> | <del>regains</del> <add>claims</add> precedence by a title to which no<lb/> | ||
other of equal cogency <add>goodness</add> can be opposed. If for the understanding<lb/> | other of equal cogency <add>goodness</add> can be opposed. If for the understanding<lb/> | ||
if the rendering of it be necessary, <add>so irresistible is</add> the consideration <add>by</add> which adjudge<lb/> | |||
the precedence <add>is adjudged</add> to be is so strong that no other can enter into | the precedence <add>is adjudged</add> to be is so strong that no other can enter into competition with it.</p> | ||
<note>21<lb/> | <note>21<lb/> | ||
Line 58: | Line 52: | ||
last.</note> | last.</note> | ||
<p>By this consideration it is that that order has <add>was</add><lb/> | |||
been dictated <add>determined</add>, which has been <add>will be seen</add> observed in <add>given to</add> the marshalling<lb/> | |||
of the <del><gap/></del> several portions of matter<lb/> | |||
which will be found under the several titles <add>heads</add>, and thence<lb/> | |||
in the marshalling of <add>order given on that occasion to</add> the heads or titles themselves.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
8 Aug. 1811 10
Fallacies
Ch. Classification
10
Those Placing fifth B. where for the purposes of
it required to be before B.
20
The order in which
the heads themselves
would be displayed
to best advantage
coincides not compleatly
with that in
which the matters
contained under them
will be displayed to
best advantage
In the classing of these fallacies the force of which seemed to direct address itself
to the affections to the affections, together with those of which the force seemed to direct respectively to address
itself to the imagination and the judgment, the order which seemed preferable on other
accounts for the for the marshalling of the
divisional titles had they stood by themselves would have here have</unclear> been preferred
could not with advantage be given to the portions of matters
respectively contained brought to view under those heads.
If of two portions divisions of matter one can not so well there be one and but one which
be understood till the other has passed under review
that without which the other can not so well be understood
regains claims precedence by a title to which no
other of equal cogency goodness can be opposed. If for the understanding
if the rendering of it be necessary, so irresistible is the consideration by which adjudge
the precedence is adjudged to be is so strong that no other can enter into competition with it.
21
As between the matters
contained under any
two heads one indispensable
requisite
is that which to
its being understood
requires that the other
be first read, should
in the work stand
last.
By this consideration it is that that order has was
been dictated determined, which has been will be seen observed in given to the marshalling
of the several portions of matter
which will be found under the several titles heads, and thence
in the marshalling of order given on that occasion to the heads or titles themselves.
Identifier: | JB/104/056/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1811-08-08 |
20-21 |
||
104 |
fallacies |
||
056 |
fallacies |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d10 / e10 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman 1808 |
||
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
1808 |
|||
34027 |
|||