★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
punishing any of the latter. | punishing any of the latter. | ||
<note> | |||
Where women contrive to procure themselves the | <del>Whether worse</del> Between women</note> Where women contrive to procure themselves the | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
sensation by means of women, the ordinary course | sensation by means of women, the ordinary course | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
as the latter. It appears to have been punished | as the latter. It appears to have been punished | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
in France: but the Law knows nothing of it in England. | in France<note>Code penal Tit. <unclear>85</unclear> p. 238.</note>: but the Law knows nothing of it in England. | ||
It is seems to be more common for men to | <note>Whether worse between men and women, than between men?</note> It is seems to be more common for men to | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
apply themselves to a wrong part in women, and | apply themselves to a wrong part in women, and | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
that the former contrivance is <add>a</add> more insolent affront | that the former contrivance is <add>a</add> more insolent affront | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
than the latter. The affront should be the | than the latter.<note> See Fert. Rep. <foreign>qua ex supra</foreign></note> The affront should be the | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
same if from necessity or caprice a person of the female sex a woman should | same if from necessity or caprice a person of the female sex a woman should | ||
C Paederasty
After so much as has been said on the abomination
of Paederasty little will need be said (in particular)
of any other of the other irregularities of the venereal
appetite. If it be problematical whether it be expedient
upon the whole to punish paederasts the former, it
seems next to certain that there can be no use in
punishing any of the latter.
Whether worse Between women Where women contrive to procure themselves the
sensation by means of women, the ordinary course
of nature is as much departed from as when the
like abomination is practised by men with men. The
former offense however is not so generally punished
as the latter. It appears to have been punished
in FranceCode penal Tit. 85 p. 238.: but the Law knows nothing of it in England.
Whether worse between men and women, than between men? It is seems to be more common for men to
apply themselves to a wrong part in women, and
in this case grave authors have found more enormity
than when the sex as well as the part of the
object is mistaken. Those who go often upon the principle
of the affront which they say an affair
of any such sort is to God Almighty, assure us
that the former contrivance is a more insolent affront
than the latter. See Fert. Rep. qua ex supra The affront should be the
same if from necessity or caprice a person of the female sex a woman should
take up make use a wrong part in [men] one of the male.
If there be one idea more ridiculous than another it
is that of a Legislator [interfering in an affair occasion
|
Identifier: | JB/072/204/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
072 |
penal code |
||
|
204 |
paederasty &c |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f1 / f2 / f3 / f4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
23821 |
|||
