JB/104/147/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/147/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>25 May 1811 5<lb/>
<head>25 May 1811 5<lb/>
Fallacies</head>
Fallacies</head>
<note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 9<lb/>
<note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 9<lb/>
Ch. Authority<lb/>
Ch. Authority<lb/>
§ <del>Analysis</del><lb/>
§ <del>Analysis</del><lb/>
§.2. <unclear>+</unclear> Subjects</note>
§.2. II. Subjects</note>


<p>2</p>
<p>2</p>


<note>5(a)<lb/>
<note>5<add>(a)</add><lb/>
1. Not only question of<lb/>
1. Not only question of<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">fact</hi> but d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of <hi rend="underline">law</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">fact</hi> but d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of <hi rend="underline">law</hi><lb/>
Line 18: Line 19:
factum</foreign><lb/>
factum</foreign><lb/>
2. Ex. gr. Question<lb/>
2. Ex. gr. Question<lb/>
as to import of Stud.<lb/>
as to import of Stat.<lb/>
of Ed. 3. Parliaments<lb/>
of Ed. 3. Parliaments<lb/>
to be held "once a year<lb/>
to be held "once a year<lb/>
Line 35: Line 36:
question <hi rend="underline"><foreign>quid faciendum</foreign></hi> as any other question of<lb/>
question <hi rend="underline"><foreign>quid faciendum</foreign></hi> as any other question of<lb/>
fact that can be named.</p>
fact that can be named.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:22, 6 September 2018

Click Here To Edit

25 May 1811 5
Fallacies

2o 9
Ch. Authority
§ Analysis
§.2. II. Subjects

2

5(a)
1. Not only question of
fact but do of law
a question quid
factum

2. Ex. gr. Question
as to import of Stat.
of Ed. 3. Parliaments
to be held "once a year
"or oftener if need be."

On the any occasion of judicial argument In judicial procedure a distinction
which on every occasion is liable to arise be brought to
view is that between the question of fact and the
question of law: — but to the purpose now at present in hand,
viz. with a view to the question quid faciendum,
under the question quid factum is included as
well the question of law as the question of fact: the
question whether to such or such effect the effect supposed a law or rule of
law exists or is to be considered as existing being as
much a question of fact — and as such a question distinct from the
question quid faciendum as any other question of
fact that can be named.



Identifier: | JB/104/147/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-05-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

5a

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

147

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

34118

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in