JB/011/127/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/127/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1829 Aug. 6<lb/> Reformists reviewed.</head> <p><note> <!-- in pencil -->Conclusion</note></p> <p><note>Brougham<lb/> Merits.<lb/><sic>O'Connel</sic></note></p> <p><!-- numbers in pencil --> (2) (2) <lb/>30 Aug Superseded &#x2014; concisely</p> <p> Nor yet in our view of the number is the supply<lb/> wanting.  Success was hopeless: the time was not ripe for<lb/>it was the <gap/>  The Schoolmaster had not yet been<lb/>sent abroad: much less had he compleated the cause<lb/> what he is now occupied in <gap/>.  Under these circumstances<lb/> of all courses practically the most eligible was<lb/> the letting down in this gentle way the institution <add>measures</add> the<lb/> carrying of which was so manifestly and incontestably<lb/> impossible.</p> <p>An apology thus <add> so completely</add> valid thus evils grounded, can it<lb/>be fund for the course taken by him in relation to Law<lb/> Reform? we <del>doubt it</del> wish it, rather than hope it &#x2014;: but<lb/> the reader will judge.  Throughout the <gap/> of his <gap/><lb/> we see him toiling in the task of reconciling things irreconcilable:<lb/> service of God and service of Mammon.  In<lb/> Henry Brougham we see throughout a Hercules.  <del>But <add>Alas!</add></del> in his<lb/> choice, <del>alas!</del> we see not <add>alas!</add> the choice of Hercules. No <add>Yes</add> to<lb/> Daniel O'Connell we must look if to the sight of Hercules<lb/> we wish to add the sight of the <gap/> of Hercules.  In<lb/> the cases of Law reform (not to speak as yet  <add>in the present occasion</add> of Parliamentary <lb/> Reform) he <del>as</del> <add> or</add> no man, will take the <gap/>.  They being undebateable<lb/> what will now be the course of Henry Brougham.<lb/> Which is it that O'Connell will find in him?  A second or<lb/> an Opponent?  On which side will he serve?  As Lieutenant<lb/> General on the side of Reform, or as General on the side of <gap/>?<lb/> <add>Of whom will he take Counsel?</add> When will he take his Councillors?  Wisdom and <sic>magnamity</sic> or in part, a Jealousy and <gap/> on the other? &#x2014; The<lb/> <gap/> will <gap/></p> <p> So much for proposition, <gap/> <gap/> <gap/>.<lb/> Now for <!-- brackets in pencil -->[a few] proofs and exemplifications: more than in<lb/> for there is room for: a few in here is the only choice</p> <p><note>[+]1 Ordinary &#x2014; not to say<lb/> Vulgar Ambition<lb/> pulling one way:<lb/> <sic>Transendal</sic> Ambition<lb/> the other way.  But<lb/> the flowering <gap/.<lb/> with its famously<lb/> <del><gap/></del> <add> surface</add> appear to<lb/> him caught him <Add> as it were</add> by<lb/> the eye: not destined<lb/> to receive his footsteps<lb/> in the rugged and mountainous<lb/> substance.</note></p> <p><note> [+]2 Against Abuse &#x2014;<lb/> against the Pretence<lb/> in all its shapes, enlisting<lb/> himself under Jeremy<lb/> Bentham &#x2014; (so <del>to have</del> the<lb/> <gap/> <gap/> himself<lb/> has over and over again<lb/> declared) he has not set<lb/> down the sword &#x2014; he has<lb/> flung away the scabbard.<lb/> <!-- continues along the right hand edge of the page --> He has cut off the field of <gap/>:  He has abjured the indiserv<gap/> defence of right and wrong: he has made <add>offered up</add> the <gap/> of his matchless talents upon the alter of <lb/> Justice.</p>
<head>1829 Aug. 6<lb/> Reformists reviewed.</head> <p><note> <!-- in pencil -->Conclusion</note></p> <p><note>Brougham<lb/> Merits.<lb/><sic>O'Connel</sic></note></p> <p><!-- numbers in pencil --> (2) (2) <lb/>30 Aug Superseded &#x2014; concisely</p> <p> Nor yet in our view of the number is the supply<lb/> wanting.  Success was hopeless: the time was not ripe for<lb/>it was the <gap/>  The Schoolmaster had not yet been<lb/>sent abroad: much less had he compleated the cause<lb/> which he is now occupied in <gap/>.  Under these circumstances<lb/> of all courses practically the most eligible was<lb/> the letting down in this gentle way the institution <add>measures</add> the<lb/> carrying of which was so manifestly and incontestably<lb/> impossible.</p> <p>An apology thus <add> so completely</add> valid thus evils grounded, can it<lb/>be found for the course taken by him in relation to Law<lb/> Reform? we <del>doubt it</del> wish it, rather than hope it &#x2014;: but<lb/> the reader will judge.  Throughout the whole of his career<lb/> we see him toiling in the task of reconciling things irreconcilable:<lb/> service of God and service of Mammon.  In<lb/> Henry Brougham we see throughout a Hercules.  <del>But <add>Alas!</add></del> in his<lb/> choice, <del>alas!</del> we see not <add>alas!</add> the choice of Hercules. No <add>Yes</add> to<lb/> Daniel O'Connell we must look if to the sight of Hercules<lb/> we wish to add the sight of the choice of Hercules.  In<lb/> the cases of Law Reform (not to speak as yet  <add>on the present occasion</add> of Parliamentary <lb/> Reform) he <del>as</del> <add> or</add> no man, will take the lead.  They being undebateable<lb/> what will now be the course of Henry Brougham.<lb/> Which is it that O'Connell will find in him?  A second or<lb/> an Opponent?  On which side will he serve?  As Lieutenant<lb/> General on the side of Reform, or as General on the side of Abuse?<lb/> <add>Of whom will he take Counsel?</add> Whom will he take for his Councillors?  Wisdom and <sic>magnamity</sic><lb/> or one part, or Jealousy and Envy on the other? &#x2014; The<lb/> <gap/> will <gap/></p> <p> So much for propositions, surmises <gap/> <gap/>.<lb/> Now for <!-- brackets in pencil -->[a few] proofs and exemplifications: more than as<lb/> far there is room for: a few as here is the only choice</p> <p><note>[+]1 Ordinary &#x2014; not to say<lb/> Vulgar Ambition<lb/> pulling one way:<lb/> <sic>Transcendent</sic> Ambition<lb/> the other way.  But<lb/> the flowering <unclear>plum</unclear><lb/> with its fascinating<lb/> <del><gap/></del> <add> surface</add> appear to<lb/> him caught him <add> as it were</add> by<lb/> the eye: not destined<lb/> to receive his footsteps<lb/> in the rugged and mountainous<lb/> <unclear>substance</unclear>.</note></p> <p><note> [+]2 Against Abuse &#x2014;<lb/> against the Pretence<lb/> in all its shapes, enlisting<lb/> himself under Jeremy<lb/> Bentham &#x2014; (so <del>to have</del> the<lb/> GENEROUS <gap/> himself<lb/> has over and over again<lb/> declared) he has not set<lb/> down the sword &#x2014; he has<lb/> flung away the scabbard.<lb/> <!-- continues along the right hand edge of the page --> He has cast off the filth of lucre:  He has abjured the indiserv<gap/> defence of right and wrong: he has made <add>offered up</add> the offering of his matchless talents upon the alter of <lb/> Justice.</note></p>





Revision as of 11:56, 6 November 2018

Click Here To Edit

1829 Aug. 6
Reformists reviewed.

Conclusion

Brougham
Merits.
O'Connel

(2) (2)
30 Aug Superseded — concisely

Nor yet in our view of the number is the supply
wanting. Success was hopeless: the time was not ripe for
it was the The Schoolmaster had not yet been
sent abroad: much less had he compleated the cause
which he is now occupied in . Under these circumstances
of all courses practically the most eligible was
the letting down in this gentle way the institution measures the
carrying of which was so manifestly and incontestably
impossible.

An apology thus so completely valid thus evils grounded, can it
be found for the course taken by him in relation to Law
Reform? we doubt it wish it, rather than hope it —: but
the reader will judge. Throughout the whole of his career
we see him toiling in the task of reconciling things irreconcilable:
service of God and service of Mammon. In
Henry Brougham we see throughout a Hercules. But Alas! in his
choice, alas! we see not alas! the choice of Hercules. No Yes to
Daniel O'Connell we must look if to the sight of Hercules
we wish to add the sight of the choice of Hercules. In
the cases of Law Reform (not to speak as yet on the present occasion of Parliamentary
Reform) he as or no man, will take the lead. They being undebateable
what will now be the course of Henry Brougham.
Which is it that O'Connell will find in him? A second or
an Opponent? On which side will he serve? As Lieutenant
General on the side of Reform, or as General on the side of Abuse?
Of whom will he take Counsel? Whom will he take for his Councillors? Wisdom and magnamity
or one part, or Jealousy and Envy on the other? — The
will

So much for propositions, surmises .
Now for [a few] proofs and exemplifications: more than as
far there is room for: a few as here is the only choice

[+]1 Ordinary — not to say
Vulgar Ambition
pulling one way:
Transcendent Ambition
the other way. But
the flowering plum
with its fascinating
surface appear to
him caught him as it were by
the eye: not destined
to receive his footsteps
in the rugged and mountainous
substance.

[+]2 Against Abuse —
against the Pretence
in all its shapes, enlisting
himself under Jeremy
Bentham — (so to have the
GENEROUS himself
has over and over again
declared) he has not set
down the sword — he has
flung away the scabbard.
He has cast off the filth of lucre: He has abjured the indiserv defence of right and wrong: he has made offered up the offering of his matchless talents upon the alter of
Justice.




Identifier: | JB/011/127/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-08-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

127

Info in main headings field

reformists reviewed

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

[[page_numbering::c2 / c2 [sic]]]

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"30 aug superseded - concisely" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

3824

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in