JB/118/053/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/053/002: Difference between revisions

Lrwean (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>Memorioalist humbly apprehends, no sort of difference<lb/>
<p>Memorialist humbly apprehends, no sort of difference<lb/>
so far as any such investment took place previously<lb/>
so far as any such investment took place previously<lb/>
the the aforesaid decision of the twelve Judges,<lb/>
to the aforesaid decision of the twelve Judges,<lb/>
the complainant stands precluded by a decision,<lb/>
the complainant stands precluded by a decision,<lb/>
pronounced against himself: so far as such<lb/>
pronounced against himself: so far as such .....<lb/>
investment took place subsequently to such decision,<lb/>
investment took place subsequently to such decision,<lb/>
he and all similar complainants, at least in respect<lb/>
he and all similar complainants, at least in respect<lb/>
of the Neighbourhood and spot in question, stand<lb/>
of the neighbourhood and spot in question, stand<lb/>
equally precluded; and <hi rend="underline">that</hi>, not only by the <hi rend="underline">principle</hi><lb/>
equally precluded; and <hi rend="underline">that</hi>, not only by the <hi rend="underline">principle</hi><lb/>
of the decision, but, even here, by that very <hi rend="underline">individual</hi><lb/>
of the decision, but, even here, by that very <hi rend="underline">individual</hi><lb/>
Line 17: Line 17:
Neighbourhood, an establishment fot that purpose<lb/>
Neighbourhood, an establishment fot that purpose<lb/>
was not deemed by the 12 Judges a nuisance; or at<lb/>
was not deemed by the 12 Judges a nuisance; or at<lb/>
least such a Nuisance, against which a Neighbour<lb/>
least such a nuisance, against which a neighbour<lb/>
hood, and in particular that neighbourhood, had<lb/>
hood, and in particular that neighbourhood, had<lb/>
any title to be relieved.</p>
any title to be achieved.</p>


<p>In vain would it be urged, that the number of<lb/>
<p>In vain would <add>it</add> be urged, that the number of<lb/>
persons exposedto its influence was not so great then<lb/>
persons exposed to its influence was not so great then<lb/>
as it is become now: And that therefore, although<lb/>
as it is become now: And that therefore, although<lb/>
the Nuisance was not, in respect to the number of<lb/>
the nuisance was not, in respect to the number of<lb/>
Persons and Quantity of property affected by it,<lb/>
Persons and quantity of property affected by it,<lb/>
arrived, at <hi rend="underline">that</hi> time, at such a Height as to create<lb/>
arrived, at <hi rend="underline">that</hi> time, at such a Height as to create<lb/>
a title to relief against itself, it does not follow<lb/>
a title to relief against itself, it does not follow<lb/>
but that it may have arrived at such a pitch by<lb/>
but that it may have arrived at such a pitch by<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">this</hi> time. In vain: since in the first place it<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">this</hi> time. In vain: since in the first place it<lb/>
would</p>
<add>would</add></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 16:12, 13 November 2018

Click Here To Edit

Memorialist humbly apprehends, no sort of difference
so far as any such investment took place previously
to the aforesaid decision of the twelve Judges,
the complainant stands precluded by a decision,
pronounced against himself: so far as such .....
investment took place subsequently to such decision,
he and all similar complainants, at least in respect
of the neighbourhood and spot in question, stand
equally precluded; and that, not only by the principle
of the decision, but, even here, by that very individual
decision itself. They were told by that decision, and told
before hand, that whatever might be thought by the
Neighbourhood, an establishment fot that purpose
was not deemed by the 12 Judges a nuisance; or at
least such a nuisance, against which a neighbour
hood, and in particular that neighbourhood, had
any title to be achieved.

In vain would it be urged, that the number of
persons exposed to its influence was not so great then
as it is become now: And that therefore, although
the nuisance was not, in respect to the number of
Persons and quantity of property affected by it,
arrived, at that time, at such a Height as to create
a title to relief against itself, it does not follow
but that it may have arrived at such a pitch by
this time. In vain: since in the first place it
would



Identifier: | JB/118/053/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

053

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f21 / f22

Penner

Watermarks

coles

Marginals

Paper Producer

patrick colquhoun

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

see note to letter 988, vol. 5

ID Number

39107

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in