★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/011/139/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/011/139/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<head> | <head>1829 Aug. 10.<lb/>Reformists reviewed.</head> <p><note>Peel.</note></p> <p><note>1<lb/>Peel will do nothing<lb/> against without the Judges<lb/> Judges nothing against<lb/> their own interest and<lb/> prejudice</note></p> <p> Peel. Brougham <gap/> <unclear>perils to J.B.? <!-- number in pencil --> (1)</p> <p>When one sees the production of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Gill <gap/> <gap/> not <gap/> will<lb/> to which part of his form his intellectual or <gap/> <gap/> <del>like</del> <gap/> <gap/> — the <gap/>-quacking part</p> <p> In regard to hopes for Mr Peel the matter closed<lb/> there. Mr Peel will <add>not</add> bring forward any thing that is not approved<lb/> of by <gap/> the Judges: the Judges <add><gap/></add> will not approve<lb/> of any thing that runs <foreign>contra</foreign> to their <add>own</add> interest and interest-begotten<lb/>and authority begotten prejudices: and nothing that<lb/> of stature is good and now nothing as this that as we<lb/> admire to those same adverse interests</p> <p><note>2<lb/> No intellect for judging<lb/> of his own accord whatever<lb/> intellect he had, enfeebled<lb/> by <foreign>Alma Mater</foreign></note></p> <p><del>How much</del> He sits in the lap of these two Nurses,<lb/> how should he do otherwise. This judging on <gap/> they in<lb/> its own <gap/> no <gap/> does he possess. Whatsoever<lb/> <add>intellect</add> nature gives him was become enfeebled and rendered<lb/> rickety in this perjury — growing <add>nursing <gap/></add> soil of <add>his</add> <foreign>Alma Mater</foreign></p> <p>If <gap/> a source presents a tolerably instructive<lb/> <gap/> has much more instructive the <foreign><gap/> i<lb/> magistri</foreign>! At his back <add>for every</add> into the published <add> <gap/></add> word, he<lb/> <del><gap/> person as</del> <add> <gap/> in the <gap/> suckled from</add> the days of Lord Eldon what better<lb/> could have been expected from him?</p> <p><note>3<lb/> Peel's acts — <add><del>their</del></add> wretched<lb/> <sic>inaptitude</sic> — the more<lb/> flagrant the faults<lb/> the more pertinacious<lb/> is Peel in his adherence<lb/> to them</note></p> <p> Before as has a copy of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel's 12<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> which<lb/> with such triumphant <add>voice and</add> gesture was <sic>bounderstuck</sic> before the eye<lb/> of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Brougham while making use of <add>them his speech</add> his speech</p> <p> If M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham did not <add> could not find him</add> we should, <del><gap/></del> <gap/> a<lb/> other of us have taken it in hand and take it to <gap/><lb/> <gap/> <sic>shewn</sic> the <add> wretched</add> <sic>inaptitude</sic> of this whole and even part of it,<lb/> had we not before us <gap/> so <sic>compleatly</sic> <gap/><lb/> that the more flagrant the faults <del><gap/></del> exposed to view the<lb/> and the more <sic>compleatly</sic> incapable he found himself <lb/> of producing any thing in the shape of a reason in support<lb/> of <gap/> the more pertinacious would be his adherence<lb/> to him the more immovable his determination<lb/>to cases then or <gap/> future secures to be <add>exactly</add> scrupulously<lb/> <gap/> copied repeated.</p> | ||
1829 Aug. 10.
Reformists reviewed.
Peel.
1
Peel will do nothing
against without the Judges
Judges nothing against
their own interest and
prejudice
Peel. Brougham <unclear>perils to J.B.? (1)
When one sees the production of Mr Gill not will
to which part of his form his intellectual or like — the -quacking part
In regard to hopes for Mr Peel the matter closed
there. Mr Peel will not bring forward any thing that is not approved
of by the Judges: the Judges will not approve
of any thing that runs contra to their own interest and interest-begotten
and authority begotten prejudices: and nothing that
of stature is good and now nothing as this that as we
admire to those same adverse interests
2
No intellect for judging
of his own accord whatever
intellect he had, enfeebled
by Alma Mater
How much He sits in the lap of these two Nurses,
how should he do otherwise. This judging on they in
its own no does he possess. Whatsoever
intellect nature gives him was become enfeebled and rendered
rickety in this perjury — growing nursing soil of his Alma Mater
If a source presents a tolerably instructive
has much more instructive the i
magistri! At his back for every into the published word, he
person as in the suckled from the days of Lord Eldon what better
could have been expected from him?
3
Peel's acts — their wretched
inaptitude — the more
flagrant the faults
the more pertinacious
is Peel in his adherence
to them
Before as has a copy of Mr Peel's 12th which
with such triumphant voice and gesture was bounderstuck before the eye
of Mr Brougham while making use of them his speech his speech
If Mr Bentham did not could not find him we should, a
other of us have taken it in hand and take it to
shewn the wretched inaptitude of this whole and even part of it,
had we not before us so compleatly
that the more flagrant the faults exposed to view the
and the more compleatly incapable he found himself
of producing any thing in the shape of a reason in support
of the more pertinacious would be his adherence
to him the more immovable his determination
to cases then or future secures to be exactly scrupulously
copied repeated.
Identifier: | JB/011/139/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1829-08-10 |
1-3 |
||
011 |
law amendment |
||
139 |
reformists reviewed |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
1829 |
|||
3836 |
|||