★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829. Aug. 10<lb/> Reformists reviewed. Rudiments</head> <p><note>Peel</note></p> <p><note>What hopes of amendment<lb/> with a long train<lb/> of encouraging pensioners<lb/> certifying him infallible</note></p> <!-- number in pencil --><p>(2)</p> <p>On the part <add>At the hands</add> of a man who has no judgement of his <add | <head>1829. Aug. 10<lb/> Reformists reviewed. Rudiments</head> <p><note>Peel</note></p> <p><note>What hopes of amendment<lb/> with a long train<lb/> of encouraging pensioners<lb/> certifying him infallible</note></p> <!-- number in pencil --><p>(2)</p> <p>On the part <add>At the hands</add> of a man who has no judgement of his <add> means good or bad</add><lb/> own what chaser of repentance <add> how gross is <gap/> the past error</add> and amendment can there be<lb/> when at the expense of £ 000 a year he has<lb/>purchased <!-- blank space --> <sic>incumbants</sic> <add>pension</add> each with a countless <unclear>hat</unclear><lb/> of expectant <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> in his brow each engaged by shape in the<lb/> shape <add>garb</add> of gratitude to say to him <add>exemplify him infallible</add> Go on as you have begun<lb/> after certifying him <add>to be</add> infallible</p> <p><note>5<lb/> All this money thrown<lb/>away by Peel to exclude<lb/> Bentham's Codes & Logic<lb/> from <sic>Hon<hi rend="superscript">ble</hi></sic> House</note></p> <p> All this money thrown out of the <add> <gap/></add> <gap/> by Peel, <lb/> and Why? Only that Codes penned by a Bentham, with <lb/> the greatest happiness principle for the moral-guide and<lb/> a new moral branch of Logic under the name of the Logic<lb/> of the <unclear>Wit</unclear> in addition to the old <add><gap/></add> branch — the Logic of the Understanding<lb/> for this intellectual guide may not <del>have</del> be able<lb/> to perceive <del>at the hands</del> of <add> <gap/> </add> the argument and <gap/> many<lb/> and the <sic>everyworldly</sic> hand and worse the agreement for an <lb/> House <sic>Honorable</sic> and <del>the</del> Right <sic>Honorable</sic> obtain an eye to<lb/> look at them, is if possible so much as an <gap/> to his<lb/> <gap/>.</p> <p><note> 6<lb/> Peel's creatures dumb<lb/> because no reason can<lb/> they find to give</note></p> <p> Dumb are all these his <add>Peel's</add> creatures: dumb by high<lb/> command. For not a law of their own will they give a<lb/> name. Why? because <del>now</del> no man being in existence<lb/> no name <del>could be</del> would they be able to find. To not a question<lb/> will they be commended — in not so much as<lb/> permitted to make answer. Why? because to <del>make</del><lb/> give any such reason — to make any such answer; would<lb/> be <hi rend="underline">controversy</hi>. Yes:, it is a declared measure <del>of</del> that <add> if this <unclear>genuine</unclear> <del><gap/></del> assessing of matchless constitution</add><lb/> no measure to what as shall ever please him to give<lb/> either birth or <unclear>suppress</unclear>, shall ever be <unclear>taken</unclear> for the subject<lb/>matter of <hi rend="underline">controversy</hi></p> | ||
1829. Aug. 10
Reformists reviewed. Rudiments
Peel
What hopes of amendment
with a long train
of encouraging pensioners
certifying him infallible
(2)
On the part At the hands of a man who has no judgement of his means good or bad
own what chaser of repentance how gross is the past error and amendment can there be
when at the expense of £ 000 a year he has
purchased incumbants pension each with a countless hat
of expectant do in his brow each engaged by shape in the
shape garb of gratitude to say to him exemplify him infallible Go on as you have begun
after certifying him to be infallible
5
All this money thrown
away by Peel to exclude
Bentham's Codes & Logic
from Honble House
All this money thrown out of the by Peel,
and Why? Only that Codes penned by a Bentham, with
the greatest happiness principle for the moral-guide and
a new moral branch of Logic under the name of the Logic
of the Wit in addition to the old branch — the Logic of the Understanding
for this intellectual guide may not have be able
to perceive at the hands of the argument and many
and the everyworldly hand and worse the agreement for an
House Honorable and the Right Honorable obtain an eye to
look at them, is if possible so much as an to his
.
6
Peel's creatures dumb
because no reason can
they find to give
Dumb are all these his Peel's creatures: dumb by high
command. For not a law of their own will they give a
name. Why? because now no man being in existence
no name could be would they be able to find. To not a question
will they be commended — in not so much as
permitted to make answer. Why? because to make
give any such reason — to make any such answer; would
be controversy. Yes:, it is a declared measure of that if this genuine assessing of matchless constitution
no measure to what as shall ever please him to give
either birth or suppress, shall ever be taken for the subject
matter of controversy
|
Identifier: | JB/011/140/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-08-10 |
4-6 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
140 |
reformists reviewed rudiments |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
3837 |
|||
