★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<head>1829 March 22<lb/> Reformists <del>Petition</del> Reviewed</head> <p><note><del> Supplemental<lb/> Postscript</del></note></p> <p><note> Reformists Classed<lb/> Historical anti-reformists</note></p> <p>(5)<lb/> <del> 27 March <add><gap/></add> <foreign>Quere</foreign> whether to employ this?</del></p> <p>15<lb/> As to <gap/><lb/> Courses — Orders here<lb/> pursued —<lb/> 1. The <gap/><lb/> 2. The <gap/>: viz<lb/> any other than the <gap/> </note></p> <p> One word as to <del>the</del> <gap/> <del>here pursued</del>. Altogether<lb/> necessary to the <gap/> <gap/> the historical order here pursued subordinate<lb/> to it the refined hand to <gap/> <gap/> be <gap/> the logical. The <gap/><lb/> <del> For the expense of the <gap/> of the <gap/></del><lb/> <add> to be <gap/> in the <gap/> of the existing system: <gap/> in this is that<lb/> portion not in respect of perks, however numerous <gap/></add><lb/> <del>system two courses <gap/> themselves to choose. <gap/></del> <lb/> <add> <gap/> — but of the whole together: and to the application of the <gap/></add><lb/><del> being a word of relative — suppose the existence</del><lb/> <add><gap/> remedy, <del.<gap/><?del> an adequate conception of the cause of the<gap/></add> <lb/> <del>of <gap/> standard of comparison, explicit of <gap/></del><lb/> <add> <gap/> is a condition altogether undispensable. Hereafter <gap/> the all-preceding </add><lb/> <del>The <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> standard of the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><del><lb/><add> and all embracing cause came to exposition <del>in the first place</del> of the principle of the evil</add><lb/> <del> shall it then be laid down in the first place</del><lb/> <add>effects |<lb/> <gap/> and declaredly, or only <del><gap/></del> implicitly and in the<lb/> way of allusion? In <add> Be</add> this question its own aversion seems<lb/> to be implied <add> conveyed</add>. Upon further reflection however such will<lb/> not be found to be the case. <add> On the other hand neither on the part of the <gap/> | <head>1829 March 22<lb/> Reformists <del>Petition</del> Reviewed</head> <p><note><del> Supplemental<lb/> Postscript</del></note></p> <p><note> Reformists Classed<lb/> Historical anti-reformists</note></p> <p>(5)<lb/> <del> 27 March <add><gap/></add> <foreign>Quere</foreign> whether to employ this?</del></p> <p>15<lb/> As to <gap/><lb/> Courses — Orders here<lb/> pursued —<lb/> 1. The <gap/><lb/> 2. The <gap/>: viz<lb/> any other than the <gap/> </note></p> <p> One word as to <del>the</del> <gap/> <del>here pursued</del>. Altogether<lb/> necessary to the <gap/> <gap/> the historical order here pursued subordinate<lb/> to it the refined hand to <gap/> <gap/> be <gap/> the logical. The <gap/><lb/> <del> For the expense of the <gap/> of the <gap/></del><lb/> <add> to be <gap/> in the <gap/> of the existing system: <gap/> in this is that<lb/> portion not in respect of perks, however numerous <gap/></add><lb/> <del>system two courses <gap/> themselves to choose. <gap/></del> <lb/> <add> <gap/> — but of the whole together: and to the application of the <gap/></add><lb/><del> being a word of relative — suppose the existence</del><lb/> <add><gap/> remedy, <del.<gap/><?del> an adequate conception of the cause of the<gap/></add> <lb/> <del>of <gap/> standard of comparison, explicit of <gap/></del><lb/> <add> <gap/> is a condition altogether <sic>undispensable.</sic> Hereafter <gap/> the all-preceding </add><lb/> <del>The <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> standard of the <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><del><lb/><add> and all embracing cause came to exposition <del>in the first place</del> of the principle of the evil</add><lb/> <del> shall it then be laid down in the first place</del><lb/> <add>effects |<lb/> <gap/> and <sic>declaredly,</sic> or only <del><gap/></del> implicitly and in the<lb/> way of allusion? In <add> Be</add> this question its own aversion seems<lb/> to be implied <add> conveyed</add>. Upon further reflection however such will<lb/> not be found to be the case. <add> On the other hand neither on the part of the <gap/></add> <!-- deletions in pencil --> <del>What it supports and grounds<lb/> <add> <gap/> of deformity <del>has exhibited</del> separately considered, was</add>itself upon is this that the [proposed system has been</del><lb/> <add> a <gap/> of their <gap/> in the mind of those in <gap/></add><lb/> <del>already the <gap/> apt system proposed as a <foreign>succedaneum</foreign></del><lb/> <gap/> of the remedy depends, a condition less <gap/>. But</add><lb/> <del>to the averred useful; system has been already <sic>compleated</sic></del><lb/> <add>be a <gap/> in assurance of <sic>inaptitude,</sic> some <gap/> of a standard of apparent</add><lb/> <del>This being supposed done, then as the proposed <gap/></del><lb/> applied as <del>/not</del> also necessary. What this was to be done For<lb/>proceeds, <Add> in its normal parts</add> the existing system is in the correspondent<lb/> any such standard in a state to <gap/> selling less the one<lb/> perk applied to it, and the difference held up to view<lb/> all-<gap/> Act in both subjects and that a <gap/> would</p> <p><del>But</del> Good. But what this course <gap/> is <gap/><lb/>that which it has <add> only</add> proposed to be <gap/> is </gap/> already <add> Considerable as <gap/></add><lb/>has been sufficient. But this if done would be the way <gap/> which the<lb/> wish here for its object the causing to be done. <add> necessity therefore was this course given up</add> Here then was a desire<lb/> to be made. In <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <add> <gap/> <del>who ca</del> what may be stated the logical</add><lb/> being that given up, the one here pursued <del>which</del> was <gap/><lb/> to it. It <add>This</add> may be stated the historical. For on another<lb/> allowed this order of <gap/> <gap/> |<sic>undispartely.</sic> <add> standard laid down would suffer it on <gap/> be <gap/> a <gap/></add> Without<lb/> <del> the th</del> a view taken <add> of the <gap/> a conception formed</add> </p> <p> <gap/> other parts a <gap/> <gap/> of aptitude <add> of the causes of the disorder</add> required to<lb/>be laid down<add> neither <del>the</del> of the excess of it, nor of the absolute</add> Such accordingly is the course which will be seen pursued<lb/> demand for the proposed remedy be understood.</p> <p> Not yet has the logical method been <add>left</add> altogether unemployed.<lb/> To a considerable extent the <gap/> of <gap/><lb/> even to such a degree apparent, that when once held up<lb/> to view to that character the <gap/> common sense sufficed<lb/> of itself for satisfying any eye that could endure<lb/> the sight, that <gap/> on the character that rightly belongs to it:<lb/> and <gap/> to the purpose of being persuaded of the inapt <gap/> or<lb/> question, <del><gap/></del> it <gap/> request that a <gap/> of the standard in<lb/> <add>question</add> <lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> question should be brought <add> held up</add><lb/> to view, held up to view<lb/> it accordingly.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
1829 March 22
Reformists Petition Reviewed
Supplemental
Postscript
Reformists Classed
Historical anti-reformists
(5)
27 March Quere whether to employ this?
15
As to
Courses — Orders here
pursued —
1. The
2. The : viz
any other than the </note>
One word as to the here pursued. Altogether
necessary to the the historical order here pursued subordinate
to it the refined hand to be the logical. The
For the expense of the of the
to be in the of the existing system: in this is that
portion not in respect of perks, however numerous
system two courses themselves to choose.
— but of the whole together: and to the application of the
being a word of relative — suppose the existence
remedy, <del.<?del> an adequate conception of the cause of the
of standard of comparison, explicit of
is a condition altogether undispensable. Hereafter the all-preceding
The standard of the of the principle of the evil</add>
<add> and all embracing cause came to exposition in the first place
shall it then be laid down in the first place
effects |
and declaredly, or only implicitly and in the
way of allusion? In <add> Be this question its own aversion seems
to be implied conveyed. Upon further reflection however such will
not be found to be the case. On the other hand neither on the part of the What it supports and grounds
<add> of deformity has exhibited separately considered, was</add>itself upon is this that the [proposed system has been
a of their in the mind of those in
already the apt system proposed as a succedaneum
of the remedy depends, a condition less . But</add>
to the averred useful; system has been already compleated
be a in assurance of inaptitude, some of a standard of apparent
This being supposed done, then as the proposed
applied as /not also necessary. What this was to be done For
proceeds, in its normal parts the existing system is in the correspondent
any such standard in a state to selling less the one
perk applied to it, and the difference held up to view
all- Act in both subjects and that a would
But Good. But what this course is
that which it has only proposed to be is </gap/> already Considerable as
has been sufficient. But this if done would be the way which the
wish here for its object the causing to be done. necessity therefore was this course given up Here then was a desire
to be made. In who ca what may be stated the logical
being that given up, the one here pursued which was
to it. It This may be stated the historical. For on another
allowed this order of |undispartely. standard laid down would suffer it on be a Without
the th a view taken of the a conception formed
other parts a of aptitude of the causes of the disorder required to
be laid down neither the of the excess of it, nor of the absolute Such accordingly is the course which will be seen pursued
demand for the proposed remedy be understood.
Not yet has the logical method been left altogether unemployed.
To a considerable extent the of
even to such a degree apparent, that when once held up
to view to that character the common sense sufficed
of itself for satisfying any eye that could endure
the sight, that on the character that rightly belongs to it:
and to the purpose of being persuaded of the inapt or
question, it request that a of the standard in
question
question should be brought held up
to view, held up to view
it accordingly.
Identifier: | JB/011/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1829-03-20 |
15 |
||
011 |
law amendment |
||
111 |
reformists reviewed |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c5 |
||
jeremy bentham |
street & co |
||
antonio alcala galiano |
|||
3808 |
|||