JB/011/111/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/111/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:




<head>1829 March 22<lb/> Reformists <del>Petition</del> Reviewed</head> <p><note><del> Supplemental<lb/> Postscript</del></note></p> <p><note> Reformists Classed<lb/> <hi rend="underline">Historical</hi> anti-reformists</note></p> <p>(5)<lb/> <del> 27 March <add><gap/></add> <foreign>Quere</foreign> whether to employ this?</del></p> <p><note>15<lb/> As to Method<lb/> Courses v Orders here<lb/> pursued &#x2014;<lb/> 1. The Historical<lb/> 2. The logical: viz<lb/> any other than the Historical </note></p> <p> One word as to <del>the</del> method <del>here pursued</del>.  Altogether<lb/> necessary to the purpose was the historical order here pursued. Subordinate<lb/> to it the refined hand to <gap/> <gap/> be <gap/> the logical.  The <gap/><lb/> <del> For the exposure of the <sic>inaptitude</sic> of the existing</del><lb/> <add> to be found in the <sic>inaptitude</sic> of the existing system: nil as this is that<lb/> portion not in respect of perks, however numerous and</add><lb/> <del>system two courses presented themselves to <unclear>choice</unclear>.  <sic>Inaptitude</sic></del> <lb/> <add> <gap/> &#x2014; but of the whole together: and to the application of the indispensable</add><lb/><del> being a word of relative &#x2014; suppose the existence</del><lb/> <add>remedy, <del><gap/></del> an adequate conception of the cause of the evil</add><del><gap/><gap/></del> <lb/> <del>of <gap/> standard of comparison, explicit or implied</del><lb/> <add> <del>was</del> is a condition altogether <sic>undispensable.</sic>  Hereafter <gap/> the all-preceding </add><lb/> <del>The <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> standard of this same being indispensable</del><lb/><add> and all embracing cause came to exposition <del>in the first place</del> of the principle of the evil</add><lb/> <del> shall it then be laid down in the first place</del><lb/> <add>effects |</add> directly and <sic>declaredly,</sic> or only <del><gap/></del> implicitly and in the<lb/> way of allusion? In <add> Be</add> this question its own answer seems<lb/> to be implied <add> conveyed</add>.  Upon further reflection however such will<lb/> not be found to be the case.  <add> On the other hand neither on the part of the <gap/></add> <!-- deletions in pencil --> <del>What it supports and</del> grounds<lb/> <add> <gap/> of deformity <del>has exhibited</del> separately considered, was</add>itself upon is this that the proposed system has been</del><lb/> <add> a <gap/> of their <gap/> in the mind of those in <gap/></add><lb/> <del>already the <gap/> apt system proposed as a <foreign>succedaneum</foreign></del><lb/> <gap/> of the remedy depends, a condition less <gap/>. But</add><lb/> <del>to the averred useful; system has been already <sic>compleated</sic></del><lb/> <add>be a <gap/> in assurance of <sic>inaptitude,</sic> some <gap/> of a standard of apparent</add><lb/> <del>This being supposed done, then as the proposed <gap/></del><lb/> applied as <del>/not</del> also necessary.  What this was to be done For<lb/>proceeds, <add> in its normal parts</add> the existing system is in the correspondent<lb/> any such standard in a state to <gap/> selling less the one<lb/> perk applied to it, and the difference held up to view<lb/> all-<gap/> Act in both subjects and that a <gap/> would</p> <p><del>But</del> Good.  But what this course <gap/> is <gap/><lb/>that which it has <add> only</add> proposed to be <gap/> is </gap/> already <add> Considerable as <gap/></add><lb/>has been sufficient.  But this if done would be the way <gap/> which the<lb/> wish here for its object the causing to be done. <add> necessity therefore was this course given up</add> Here then was a desire<lb/> to be made.  In <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <add> <gap/> <del>who ca</del> what may be stated the logical</add><lb/> being that given up, the one here pursued <del>which</del> was <gap/><lb/> to it.  It <add>This</add> may be stated the historical.  For on another<lb/> allowed this order of <gap/> <gap/> |<sic>undispartely.</sic> <add> standard laid down would suffer it on <gap/> be <gap/> a <gap/></add> Without<lb/> <del> the th</del> a view taken <add> of the <gap/> a conception formed</add> </p> <p> <gap/> other parts a <gap/> <gap/> of aptitude <add> of the causes of the disorder</add> required to<lb/>be laid down<add> neither <del>the</del> of the excess of it, nor of the absolute</add> Such accordingly is the course which will be seen pursued<lb/> demand for the proposed remedy be understood.</p> <p> Not yet has the logical method been <add>left</add> altogether unemployed.<lb/> To a considerable extent the <gap/> of <gap/><lb/> even to such a degree apparent, that when once held up<lb/> to view to that character the <gap/> common sense sufficed<lb/> of itself for satisfying any eye that could endure<lb/> the sight, that <gap/> on the character that rightly belongs to it:<lb/> and <gap/> to the purpose of being persuaded of the inapt <gap/> or<lb/> question, <del><gap/></del> it <gap/> request that a <gap/> of the standard in<lb/> <add>question</add> <lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> question should be brought <add> held up</add><lb/> to view, held up to view<lb/> it accordingly.</p>  
<head>1829 March 22<lb/> Reformists <del>Petition</del> Reviewed</head> <p><note><del> Supplemental<lb/> Postscript</del></note></p> <p><note> Reformists Classed<lb/> <hi rend="underline">Historical</hi> anti-reformists</note></p> <p>(5)<lb/> <del> 27 March <add><gap/></add> <foreign>Quere</foreign> whether to employ this?</del></p> <p><note>15<lb/> As to Method<lb/> Courses v Orders here<lb/> pursued &#x2014;<lb/> 1. The Historical<lb/> 2. The logical: viz<lb/> any other than the Historical </note></p> <p> <add>One word as to <del>the</del> method <del>here pursued</del>.  Altogether<lb/> necessary to the purpose was the historical order here pursued. Subordinate<lb/> to it the <unclear>regard paid</unclear> to what may be termed the logical.  The proportion</add><lb/> <del> For the exposure of the <sic>inaptitude</sic> of the existing</del><lb/> <add> to be found in the <sic>inaptitude</sic> of the existing system: nil as this is that<lb/> portion not in respect of perks, howsoever numerous and</add><lb/> <del>system two courses presented themselves to <unclear>choice</unclear>.  <sic>Inaptitude</sic></del> <lb/> <add> <gap/> &#x2014; but of the whole together: and to the application of the indispensable</add><lb/><del> being a word of relation &#x2014; supposes the existence</del><lb/> <add>remedy, <del><gap/></del> an adequate conception of the cause of the evil</add><del><gap/><gap/></del> <lb/> <del>of <gap/> standard of comparison, explicit or implied</del><lb/> <add> <del>was</del> is a condition altogether indispensable.Hereafter <gap/> the all-preceding </add><lb/> <del>The <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> standard of this same being indispensable</del><lb/><add> and all embracing cause came to exposition <del>in the first place</del> of the principle of the evil</add><lb/> <del> shall it then be laid down in the first place</del><lb/> <add>effects |</add> directly and <sic>declaredly,</sic> or only <del><gap/></del> implicitly and in the<lb/> way of allusion? In <add> Be</add> this question its own answer seems<lb/> to be implied <add> conveyed</add>.  Upon further reflection however such will<lb/> not be found to be the case.  <add> On the other hand neither on the part of the <gap/></add> <!-- deletions in pencil --> <del>What it supports and</del> grounds<lb/> <del>itself upon is this that the proposed system has been</del> <add> freedom of deformity <del>here exhibited</del> separately considered, was</add><lb/> <add> a <gap/> of this deformity in the mind of those in <gap/></add><lb/> <del>already the supposed apt system proposed as a <foreign>succedaneum</foreign></del><lb/> <add>application of the remedy depends, a condition less necessary. But</add><lb/> <del>to the averred useful; system has been already completed</del><lb/> <add>be a <gap/> in assurance of <sic>inaptitude,</sic> some conception of a standard of apparent</add><lb/> <del>This being supposed done, then as the proposed <gap/></del><lb/> aptitude as <del>not</del> also necessary.  What then was to be done For<lb/>proceeds, <add> in its normal parts</add> the existing system is in the correspondent<lb/> any such standard is a state to completeness selling less the one<lb/> perk applied to it, and the difference held up to view<lb/> all-<gap/> Act in both subjects and that a <gap/> <gap/></p> <p><del>But</del> Good.  But what this course supposes is that<lb/>that which it has <add> duly</add> proposed to be done is done already <add> Considered as in place</add><lb/>has been sufficient.  But this if done would be the very thing which the<lb/> which has for its object the causing to be done. <add> necessity therefore was this course given up</add> Here then was a desire<lb/> to be made.  In <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <add> <gap/> <del>who ca</del> what may be stated the logical</add><lb/> being that given up, the one here pursued <del>which</del> was <gap/><lb/> to it.  It <add>This</add> may be stated the historical.  For on another<lb/> allowed this order of <gap/> <gap/> |<sic>undispartely.</sic> <add> standard laid down would suffer it on <gap/> be <gap/> a <gap/></add> Without<lb/> <del> the th</del> a view taken <add> of the <gap/> a conception formed</add> </p> <p> <gap/> other parts a <gap/> <gap/> of aptitude <add> of the causes of the disorder</add> required to<lb/>be laid down<add> neither <del>the</del> of the excess of it, nor of the absolute</add> Such accordingly is the course which will be seen pursued<lb/> demand for the proposed remedy be understood.</p> <p> Not yet has the logical method been <add>left</add> altogether unemployed.<lb/> To a considerable extent the <gap/> of <gap/><lb/> even to such a degree apparent, that when once held up<lb/> to view to that character the <gap/> common sense sufficed<lb/> of itself for satisfying any eye that could endure<lb/> the sight, that <gap/> on the character that rightly belongs to it:<lb/> and <gap/> to the purpose of being persuaded of the inapt <gap/> or<lb/> question, <del><gap/></del> it <gap/> request that a <gap/> of the standard in<lb/> <add>question</add> <lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> question should be brought <add> held up</add><lb/> to view, held up to view<lb/> it accordingly.</p>  




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:15, 5 December 2018

Click Here To Edit


1829 March 22
Reformists Petition Reviewed

Supplemental
Postscript

Reformists Classed
Historical anti-reformists

(5)
27 March Quere whether to employ this?

15
As to Method
Courses v Orders here
pursued —
1. The Historical
2. The logical: viz
any other than the Historical

One word as to the method here pursued. Altogether
necessary to the purpose was the historical order here pursued. Subordinate
to it the regard paid to what may be termed the logical. The proportion

For the exposure of the inaptitude of the existing
to be found in the inaptitude of the existing system: nil as this is that
portion not in respect of perks, howsoever numerous and

system two courses presented themselves to choice. Inaptitude
— but of the whole together: and to the application of the indispensable
being a word of relation — supposes the existence
remedy, an adequate conception of the cause of the evil
of standard of comparison, explicit or implied
was is a condition altogether indispensable.Hereafter the all-preceding
The standard of this same being indispensable
and all embracing cause came to exposition in the first place of the principle of the evil
shall it then be laid down in the first place
effects | directly and declaredly, or only implicitly and in the
way of allusion? In Be this question its own answer seems
to be implied conveyed. Upon further reflection however such will
not be found to be the case. On the other hand neither on the part of the What it supports and grounds
itself upon is this that the proposed system has been freedom of deformity here exhibited separately considered, was
a of this deformity in the mind of those in
already the supposed apt system proposed as a succedaneum
application of the remedy depends, a condition less necessary. But
to the averred useful; system has been already completed
be a in assurance of inaptitude, some conception of a standard of apparent
This being supposed done, then as the proposed
aptitude as not also necessary. What then was to be done For
proceeds, in its normal parts the existing system is in the correspondent
any such standard is a state to completeness selling less the one
perk applied to it, and the difference held up to view
all- Act in both subjects and that a

But Good. But what this course supposes is that
that which it has duly proposed to be done is done already Considered as in place
has been sufficient. But this if done would be the very thing which the
which has for its object the causing to be done. necessity therefore was this course given up Here then was a desire
to be made. In who ca what may be stated the logical
being that given up, the one here pursued which was
to it. It This may be stated the historical. For on another
allowed this order of |undispartely. standard laid down would suffer it on be a Without
the th a view taken of the a conception formed

other parts a of aptitude of the causes of the disorder required to
be laid down neither the of the excess of it, nor of the absolute Such accordingly is the course which will be seen pursued
demand for the proposed remedy be understood.

Not yet has the logical method been left altogether unemployed.
To a considerable extent the of
even to such a degree apparent, that when once held up
to view to that character the common sense sufficed
of itself for satisfying any eye that could endure
the sight, that on the character that rightly belongs to it:
and to the purpose of being persuaded of the inapt or
question, it request that a of the standard in
question
question should be brought held up
to view, held up to view
it accordingly.



Identifier: | JB/011/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-03-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

15

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

111

Info in main headings field

reformists reviewed

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

3808

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in