JB/104/354/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/354/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


28 May 1811 5
<head>28 May 1811 5<lb/>
Fallacies
Fallacies</head>


Ch. Self-trumpeters
<note>Ch. Self-trumpeters<lb/>
§.2. Exposure
§.2. Exposure</note>


3
<p>3</p>


7
<note>7<lb/>
Though by self-
Though by self-<lb/>
trumpeting no proof
trumpeting no proof<lb/>
is given of his being
is given of his being<lb/>
yet neither is any
yet neither is any<lb/>
conclusive proof given
conclusive proof given<lb/>
in general, of his not
<hi rend="underline">in general</hi>, of his <hi rend="underline">not</hi><lb/>
being a man of virtue.
being a man of virtue.</note>


Although from the pains thus taken by a man in painting to painting
<p>Although from the pains thus taken by a man in painting <add>to painting</add><lb/>
himself in the colours of virtue it does not no
himself in the colours of virtue <del>it does not</del> no<lb/>
proof is rational course is given for regardin looking upon him as being a
<del>proof is</del> <add>rational course is</add> given for <del>regardin</del> looking upon him as being <del>a<lb/>
<gap/>, yet neither from his doing so that does it in
<gap/></del>, yet neither from his doing so <del>that</del> does it in<lb/>
every case absolutely follow that he is not, a man
every case absolutely follow that he is not, a man<lb/>
of virtue.
of virtue.</p>


8
<note>8<lb/>
Case (mentioned for
Case (mentioned for<lb/>
illustration, in what
illustration, in which<lb/>
pretending to be a man
pretending to be a man<lb/>
of probity, a man
of probity, a man<lb/>
can not possibly be
can not possibly be<lb/>
what he pretends to be
what he pretends to be<lb/>
Judge who, in a single-
Judge who, in a single-<lb/>
seated judicatory, his
seated judicatory, his<lb/>
rate of dispatch being
rate of dispatch being<lb/>
(say but 1/5th) below
(say but 1/5<hi rend="superscript">th</hi>) below<lb/>
the ordinary rate, retains
the ordinary rate, retains<lb/>
his seat notwithstanding.
his seat notwithstanding.</note>


One case has For illustration one case however may
<p><del>One case has</del> For illustration one case however may<lb/>
be mentioned in which in so far as a man
be mentioned in which in so far as a man<lb/>
being in a situation of conforming of  
being in a situation <del>of conforming</del> <add>of</add> public trust <sic>indulg</sic><lb/>
himself in this talk in these professions, it is not<lb/>
possible that he should be what he <add>thus</add> pretends to be.</p>
 
<p>This is the case of a Judge, whose <add>who his</add> situation being<lb/>
in a single seated judicatory, in which consequently<lb/>
<del>the rate of dispatch</del> <add>under</add> the system of procedure being<lb/>
given the role of dispatch depends singly on himself<lb/>
continues in his seat after having <del><gap/></del> by sufficient<lb/>
length of experience learnt that the degree of dispatch<lb/>
which his faculties enable him to give<lb/>
falls by a certain amount below the average rate.</p>
 
<note>9.<lb/>
<add><hi rend="underline"><foreign>Considitur</foreign></hi></add> Manifesting itself only<lb/>
in <hi rend="underline">erroneous decisions</hi>,<lb/>
though ever so constantly<lb/>
erroneous so long as<lb/>
not declared so to be<lb/>
by r<gap/> or in<gap/><lb/>
the most perfect i<gap/><lb/>
is not in <gap/> with<lb/>
pure probity.</note>
 
<p>False <add>Weakness of</add> judgment in any degree, misdecision in<lb/>
any degree of frequency is not inconsistent with<lb/>
probity &#x2014; with the purest probity. For so it may be<lb/>
that though in doing what he does he does that<lb/>
which in the eyes of other men &#x2014; of other men in<lb/>
general and in particular of those to whom by a special<lb/>
title it belongs to judge he is doing wrong: yet in his own<lb/>
<add>eyes</add><lb/>
<note>eyes what is not<lb/>
impossible or rather<lb/>
what by the supposition<lb/>
is true, what he does <add>is doing</add><lb/>
is right.</note></p>





Revision as of 08:56, 2 January 2019

Click Here To Edit

28 May 1811 5
Fallacies

Ch. Self-trumpeters
§.2. Exposure

3

7
Though by self-
trumpeting no proof
is given of his being
yet neither is any
conclusive proof given
in general, of his not
being a man of virtue.

Although from the pains thus taken by a man in painting to painting
himself in the colours of virtue it does not no
proof is rational course is given for regardin looking upon him as being a
, yet neither from his doing so that does it in
every case absolutely follow that he is not, a man
of virtue.

8
Case (mentioned for
illustration, in which
pretending to be a man
of probity, a man
can not possibly be
what he pretends to be
Judge who, in a single-
seated judicatory, his
rate of dispatch being
(say but 1/5th) below
the ordinary rate, retains
his seat notwithstanding.

One case has For illustration one case however may
be mentioned in which in so far as a man
being in a situation of conforming of public trust indulg
himself in this talk in these professions, it is not
possible that he should be what he thus pretends to be.

This is the case of a Judge, whose who his situation being
in a single seated judicatory, in which consequently
the rate of dispatch under the system of procedure being
given the role of dispatch depends singly on himself
continues in his seat after having by sufficient
length of experience learnt that the degree of dispatch
which his faculties enable him to give
falls by a certain amount below the average rate.

9.
Considitur Manifesting itself only
in erroneous decisions,
though ever so constantly
erroneous so long as
not declared so to be
by r or in
the most perfect i
is not in with
pure probity.

False Weakness of judgment in any degree, misdecision in
any degree of frequency is not inconsistent with
probity — with the purest probity. For so it may be
that though in doing what he does he does that
which in the eyes of other men — of other men in
general and in particular of those to whom by a special
title it belongs to judge he is doing wrong: yet in his own
eyes
eyes what is not
impossible or rather
what by the supposition
is true, what he does is doing
is right.




Identifier: | JB/104/354/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-05-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

7-9

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

354

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

peregrine bingham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34325

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in