JB/137/005/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/005/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 56: Line 56:
of promise <add>non performance</add> which followed <add>in much</add> of course as if <add>he</add> those who made it<lb/>
of promise <add>non performance</add> which followed <add>in much</add> of course as if <add>he</add> those who made it<lb/>
had been all monarchs. <add>and engaged in a Holy regard.<add>League.</add></add> The other is the offers made of the<lb/>
had been all monarchs. <add>and engaged in a Holy regard.<add>League.</add></add> The other is the offers made of the<lb/>
Parliamentary self-sacrifice.
Parliamentary self-sacrifice.</p>
</p>
 
<p>"To ensure ... tranquillity, it was absolutely necessary" (says <note>Hary p.271</note><lb/>
the biographer) "to <gap/> the delegates, that, notwithstanding what<pb/>
"had passed in Parliament, the original object of their meeting should<lb/>
"in no wise be departed from, and that a Parliamentary Reform<lb/>
"should as se<gap/>sly attended to, though in a different form, as<lb/>
"it had been before. This conviction was accordingly as diligently<lb/>
impreesed, and the provision  <del><gap/></del> contained in its faithfully uninformed,<lb/>
by Lord Charlemont, as if his name had been Pitt, <add>or Fox</add> or Grey, or Sheridan<lb/>
<del>or Graham</del> what other name, my Lord, shall we add?</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 20:30, 13 January 2019

Click Here To Edit

1819 June 25

To

Lett.7
S4.Pos 3
ber
Of the On the 29th of November 1783 the Irish Parliament or 14
Hardy 269 to 273
Novr 29th. 1783. Parliament
Between In
convention and ment,
angry words:
nothing worse. Persuaded By
Charlemont. Convention
adjourned. Parliament
admission

Of the On the 29th of November 1783 the Irish Parliament
met and on the Convention was assured a time ofmoral authority which in the
Parliament could not be endowed. brooked Angry High words in both assemblies:
any thing worse than high angry words no where. So In the Hardy
Lord Charlemont succeeded in persuading the to adjourn, and a
of determined address to the King being voted by both Houses of Parliament
the Convention met never met again. In peace, it had begun and continent It ended in it begun
in peace, and in peace it ended.

That in all this any thing of the his Lordship the noble President did otherwise than
right is more than I can take upon me to say, "The Delegates
(say. the biographers) did not, not could they then include the
'Catholic body": this is one reason. Ireland had it ever been
united could not have stood out against Great Britain, with the
monarchy, the aristocracy, Lords on their own <add>House</add>, and the Lords in the House and these dependents
of Commons by which it was ruled; this is another reason. The
Irish mind which is not now was still less was no then the English mind: ( is it now) this
was a third reason. The subject of Parliamentary reform tend not
as that men received from any one that any thing like consideration which for such so
many well furnished minds it has received since: this is a
fourth reason: and more perhaps might be added. On these
things considered, it seems that in these times the impure has reason to felicitate itself that in Ireland in those
times no plan of parliamentary reform was
endeavoured at. For any such
endeavour the most populous
of the three kingdoms
is purely in comparison
of any other the most eligible
spot on which at any time it can some can
originate Hardy p.27

Two particularssubjects more call present<add>come here</add>a right to for mention.
given of a support to parliamentary reform; and that breachperfidy
of promise non performance which followed in much of course as if he those who made it
had been all monarchs. and engaged in a Holy regard.<add>League.</add> The other is the offers made of the
Parliamentary self-sacrifice.

"To ensure ... tranquillity, it was absolutely necessary" (says Hary p.271
the biographer) "to the delegates, that, notwithstanding what
---page break---
"had passed in Parliament, the original object of their meeting should
"in no wise be departed from, and that a Parliamentary Reform
"should as sesly attended to, though in a different form, as
"it had been before. This conviction was accordingly as diligently
impreesed, and the provision contained in its faithfully uninformed,
by Lord Charlemont, as if his name had been Pitt, or Fox or Grey, or Sheridan
or Graham what other name, my Lord, shall we add?




Identifier: | JB/137/005/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-06-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 14 - or 16

Box

137

Main Headings

parliamentary reform

Folio number

005

Info in main headings field

to erskine

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

46722

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in