JB/071/051/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/051/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/051/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/051/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>C</head><lb/><head>Of Theft</head><lb/>
<p>the discretion of the judge and the appearance<lb/> of danger still continues:  and <add>it will be the case of</add> the Judge <del>will <gap/></del><lb/> <del><gap/></del> not to let the offender off entirely, so long as <lb/>the smallest speech of mitigation remains that the<lb/>restitution could not have been made had it not<lb/> been for the intervention of some <unclear>pressing</unclear> circumstance<lb/> prior to the commission of the offence.</p> <note>From p.25 No1</note> <head>Question III</head><lb/>  <p>Why a certain <del><gap/></del> quantity of hard labour<lb/> is appointed in addition to that which<lb/> is proportioned to the <del><gap/> of the <gap/></del> <add>value of the thing stolen</add>?</p> <head>Reasons</head><lb/>  <p>1.  Because otherwise in thefts to a very<lb/> small amount the punishment might be so<lb/> trifling as to make no impression. <del><gap/></del>  See<lb/>Tit [Simple <gap/> <gap/>]</p> <note>Back to p.25 no 2.</note>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 07:52, 19 September 2011

Click Here To Edit

C
Of Theft

the discretion of the judge and the appearance
of danger still continues: and it will be the case of the Judge will
not to let the offender off entirely, so long as
the smallest speech of mitigation remains that the
restitution could not have been made had it not
been for the intervention of some pressing circumstance
prior to the commission of the offence.

From p.25 No1 Question III

Why a certain quantity of hard labour
is appointed in addition to that which
is proportioned to the of the value of the thing stolen?

Reasons

1. Because otherwise in thefts to a very
small amount the punishment might be so
trifling as to make no impression. See
Tit [Simple ]

Back to p.25 no 2.



UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in