JB/137/040/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/040/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
<p>1819 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 18</p>
<p>1819 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 18</p>
<p>- Radicalism not dangerous</p>
<p>- Radicalism not dangerous</p>
&#x2014;
&#x2014;<lb/>
I shall now  <del>p<gap/></del> proceed to do what the Prince Regent's<lb/>
<p>I shall now  <del>p<gap/></del> proceed to do what the Prince Regent's<lb/>
advisers should first have done, namely bring to view the consequences<lb/>
advisers should first have done, namely bring to view the consequences<lb/>
that would result from <del><gap/> <gap/></del> the supposed subversion<lb/>
of the rights of property: namely not from the accomplishment<lb/>
of it - for that would be physically impossible - but<lb/>
from the <gap/> notoriety of a determinitive to <del>carry <gap/></del><lb/>
make any advances towards the carrying of such a design<lb/>
such effect by <add>any</add> <gap/> of person having power adequate to <lb/>
the purpose.</p>
<note>or 2<lb/>
<gap/> under which<lb/>
<gap/> <gap/>ing <gap/> is<lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
1. Intended Sh<gap/> who<lb/>
<gap/> view<lb/>
2. <gap/> equal<lb/>
3. Subject <gap/> remedy<lb/>
proposition<lb/>
<gap/> <gap/>
4. Subject matter<lb/>
inimitable<lb/>
5. Subject matters<lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
6. Subject matters <gap/><lb/>
7. Intended <gap/><lb/>
8. <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
9. Impossibility of all<lb/>
other so<gap/> design<lb/>
10. <add><gap/></add><gap/> <gap/><lb/>
be <gap/> of the <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
11. The <del>de</del> impractical<lb/>
impossible </note><lb/>





Revision as of 08:01, 25 April 2019

Click Here To Edit ult
1. Nature of the case
or
The following
experience should
have been made
O in the first instances
by the Prince Regents advisors by whom
the rad were
charged with their
design

1819 Decr 18

- Radicalism not dangerous


I shall now p proceed to do what the Prince Regent's
advisers should first have done, namely bring to view the consequences
that would result from the supposed subversion
of the rights of property: namely not from the accomplishment
of it - for that would be physically impossible - but
from the notoriety of a determinitive to carry
make any advances towards the carrying of such a design
such effect by any of person having power adequate to
the purpose.

or 2
under which
ing is

1. Intended Sh who
view
2. equal
3. Subject remedy
proposition
4. Subject matter
inimitable
5. Subject matters

6. Subject matters
7. Intended
8.
9. Impossibility of all
other so design
10.
be of the

11. The de impractical
impossible





Identifier: | JB/137/040/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

040

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

002

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e6

Penner

jeremy bentham; john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46757

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in