JB/057/250/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:11, 22 July 2019

1825. Jany. 20
Procedure Code

Ch. Preface
§.

Reason proper. Inaccessible to them they can not endure the
thought of its being conceived and executed by others

An objection which has been frequently heard to
be made against Codification in general will apply applies with
at least equal force and propriety and force to that
same process operation when applied to the subject of Procedure
This is the apparent alledged impossibility of comprehending the
undertaking the supposed impossibility of comprehending
by any f taking an all comprehensive view of the subject
and giving utterance to the result in an adequately
expressive body of discourse The answer is — a denial
of the antecedent — and a denial that even if the antecedent
was admitted the consequence would c follow

Of those by whom the antecedent is arrived at
what is plain enough is — that they are utterly unacquainted
with that sort of information the possession of
which would be necessary to warrant a person in
pronouncing any such opinion they are unacquainted
with the power of the human mind, and of the power
there is in language as to the giving apt expression to
the results of the exercise of those powers as applied to
the subject in question That Of possibility
fact will may it is hoped be received as a tolerably satisfactory
proof that which has thus been pronounced impossible
may have be seen actually done

Bonaparte's Collection of Codes though not executed upon any
such exhaustive plan might of itself have sufficed to
st as a practical demonstration of the groundlessness of the
supposite.

Go on to say the option is between real law how imperfectly so
ever executed and law purely imaginary: they suppose nothing preferable to something &c

Identifier: \| JB/057/250/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.
Date_1	1825-01-20	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	057	Main Headings	procedure code
Folio number	250	Info in main headings field	procedure code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	18580
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<head>1825. <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi>.</sic> 20<lb/> Procedure Code</head> <p><note>Ch. Preface<lb/>&sect;. </note></p> <p>Reason proper.   Inaccessible to them they can not endure the<lb/>thought of its being conceived and executed by others</p> <p>An objection which has been frequently heard to<lb/> be made against Codification in general will apply <add>applies</add> with<lb/> at least equal <add><del><gap/></del></add> force and propriety and force to that<lb/> same process <add>operation</add> when applied to the subject of Procedure<lb/>This is the apparent <add><sic>alledged</sic></add> impossibility of <del>comprehending</del> the<lb/>undertaking the supposed impossibility of <del>comprehending<lb/>by any f</del> taking an all comprehensive view of the subject<lb/> and giving utterance to the result in an adequately<lb/>expressive body of discourse   The answer is &#x2014; a denial<lb/> of the antecedent &#x2014; and a denial that <add>even</add> if the antecedent<lb/>was admitted the consequence would <del>c</del> follow</p> <p>If those by whom the antecedent is <gap/> at<lb/> which it plain enough is &#x2014; <gap/> they are utterly unacquainted<lb/> with that sort of information the possession of<lb/>which would be necessary to warrant a person in<lb/>pronouncing any such opinion they are unacquainted<lb/>with the power of the human mind, and of the power<lb/>there is in language as to the giving apt expression to<lb/>the results of the exercise of those powers as applied to<lb/>the subject in question   <del>That <gap/></del> Of possibility<lb/>fact will <add>may</add> they hoped be received as a tolerably satisfactory<lb/> proof that which has then been pronounced impossible<lb/>may have to <add>ultimately</add> serve them</p> <p> Bonaparte's <add>Collection of</add> Codes though not executed upon any<lb/>such exhaustive plan might of itself have sufficient to<lb/><del>st</del> as a practical demonstration of the <unclear>grandification</unclear> of the<lb/><unclear>supposite</unclear>.</p> <p> Go on to say the <unclear>option</unclear> is between real how <gap/> imperfectly so<lb/> <gap/> <unclear>existed</unclear> and like purely imaginary: they suppose nothing preferable to something &amp;c</p>
+<head>1825. <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi>.</sic> 20<lb/>
+Procedure Code</head>
+<p><note>Ch. Preface<lb/>
+&sect;. </note></p>
+<p>Reason proper. Inaccessible to them they can not endure the<lb/>
+thought of its being conceived and executed by others</p>
+<p>An objection which has been frequently heard to<lb/>
+be made against Codification in general will apply <add>applies</add> with<lb/>
+at least equal <add><del><gap/></del></add> force and propriety and force to that<lb/>
+same process <add>operation</add> when applied to the subject of Procedure<lb/>
+This is the apparent <add><sic>alledged</sic></add> impossibility of <del>comprehending</del> the<lb/>
+undertaking the supposed impossibility of <del>comprehending<lb/>
+by any f</del> taking an all comprehensive view of the subject<lb/>
+and giving utterance to the result in an adequately<lb/>
+expressive body of discourse The answer is &#x2014; a denial<lb/>
+of the antecedent &#x2014; and a denial that <add>even</add> if the antecedent<lb/>
+was admitted the consequence would <del>c</del> follow</p>
+<p>Of those by whom the antecedent is arrived at<lb/>
+what is plain enough is &#x2014; that they are utterly unacquainted<lb/>
+with that sort of information the possession of<lb/>
+which would be necessary to warrant a person in<lb/>
+pronouncing any such opinion they are unacquainted<lb/>
+with the power of the human mind, and of the power<lb/>
+there is in language as to the giving apt expression to<lb/>
+the results of the exercise of those powers as applied to<lb/>
+the subject in question <del>That <gap/></del> Of possibility<lb/>
+fact will <add>may</add> it is hoped be received as a tolerably satisfactory<lb/>
+proof that which has thus been pronounced impossible<lb/>
+may <del>have</del> be seen <add>actually</add> done</p>
+<p>Bonaparte's <add>Collection of</add> Codes though not executed upon any<lb/>
+such exhaustive plan might of itself have sufficed to<lb/>
+<del>st</del> as a practical demonstration of the groundlessness of the<lb/>
+<unclear>supposite</unclear>.</p>
+<p> Go on to say the option is between real law how imperfectly so<lb/>
+ever executed and law purely imaginary: they suppose <hi rend="underline">nothing</hi> preferable to something &amp;c</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Views

JB/057/250/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:11, 22 July 2019

Navigation

Search