JB/057/251/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/057/251/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


<head>1825 <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi>.</sic> 31<lb/>
<head>1825 <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi>.</sic> 31<lb/>
Procedure Code</head>  <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Preface &#x2014;Continue<lb/>&sect;. General Review<lb/>Characteristic</note></p> <p><note><unclear>File</unclear><lb/>Another characteristic<lb/>Flexibility</note></p> <p> 1. Characteristic of their system 1. Flexibility principle</p> <p>Another characteristic of this system is its <hi rend="underline">flexibility</hi>:<lb/>the provision it makes for <sic>minimizing</sic> evil in each<lb/> individual case according to the <add>proportion as to the</add> quantity of evil reasonably<lb/>to be expected in the different cases giving the preference <add>sometimes</add> either<lb/>
Procedure Code</head>  <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic> Preface &#x2014; <unclear>Continue</unclear><lb/>&sect;. General Review<lb/>Characteristic</note></p> <p><note><unclear>File</unclear><lb/>Another characteristic<lb/>Flexibility</note></p> <p> &sect;. Characteristic of their system 1. Flexibility principle</p> <p>Another characteristic of this system is its <hi rend="underline">flexibility</hi>:<lb/>the provision it makes for <sic>minimizing</sic> evil in each<lb/> individual case according to the <add>proportion as to the</add> quantity of evil reasonably<lb/>to be expected in the different cases giving the preference <add>sometimes</add> either<lb/>
to the direct or <add>sometimes</add> or to the collateral ends of justice.</p> <p> The <del>pr</del> topics to which the diversification is susceptible<lb/> of being applied and is here applied accordingly may be thus enumerated</p> <p><note>Topics for diversification<lb/> 1 Distance as to place<lb/> 2 <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> as to time<lb/> 3 Circumstances affecting<lb/> sensibility</note></p> <p><!-- finger pointing symbol --> Here collect them together: 1. Distance in the line of place.<llb/> 2. in the line of time. 3. Circumstances affecting sensibility, as<lb/>per <gap/> to <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> &amp;c</p> <p><note>Objections to flexibility<lb/>1. Danger from blameless<lb/> deception<lb/> 2. Danger <del>from</del> <add>of</add> abuse<lb/> by erroneous <sic>judication</sic></note></p>  <p>The only objection that principle &#x2014; the flexibility has<lb/><gap/> to be 1. changes of <add>blameless</add> deception in respect of the <del>fa</del>appropriate<lb/>facts : 2. charges of abuse by perpetually erroneous <gap/><lb/> in relation to them</p> <p><note>But evil from inflexibility<lb/>predominant<lb/> over evil from flexibility</note></p> <p>But here as elsewhere in the account between good and<lb/> evil the <gap/> to be considered is most absolute, always relative and comparative.  Compare then the evil<lb/> from flexibility with the evil from inflexibility. In case<lb/> of flexibility, the matter will be thoroughly <gap/> of the<lb/> chances be not in favour of the doing less evil by the application<lb/> of it than would have place if not application were made<lb/>of it:  but <add>and</add> where there is no flexibility the chances against the <lb/>hitting the right <add><gap/></add> point are an infinity to one.  In these as<lb/>in other cases, the <gap/> arrive at may be <gap/>: but in this<lb/> as in other cases the state of things supposed by the objection would<lb/> be ... minimal experience and observation, if the  
to the direct or <add>sometimes</add> or to the collateral ends of justice.</p> <p> The <del>pr</del> topics to which the diversification is susceptible<lb/> of being applied and is here applied accordingly may be thus<lb/> enumerated</p> <p><note>Topics for diversification<lb/> 1 Distance as to place<lb/> 2 <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> as to time<lb/> 3 Circumstances affecting<lb/> sensibility</note></p> <p><!-- finger pointing symbol --> Here collect them together: 1. Distance in the line of place.<lb/> 2. in the line of time. 3. Circumstances affecting sensibility, as<lb/>per <gap/> to <unclear>Marr</unclear> ʌ Legislation &amp;c</p> <p><note>Objections to flexibility<lb/>1. Danger from blameless<lb/> deception<lb/> 2. Danger <del>from</del> <add>of</add> abuse<lb/> by erroneous <sic>judication</sic></note></p>  <p>The only objection that principle &#x2014; the flexibility has<lb/>open to it 1. charges of <add>blameless</add> deception in respect of the <del>fa</del> appropriate<lb/>facts : 2. charges of abuse by perpetually erroneous judicature<lb/> in relation to them</p> <p><note>But evil from inflexibility<lb/>predominant<lb/> over evil from flexibility</note></p> <p>But here as elsewhere in the account between good and<lb/> evil the <gap/> to be considered is most absolute, always<lb/> relative and comparative.  Compare then the evil<lb/> from flexibility with the evil from inflexibility. In case<lb/> of flexibility, the matter will be thoroughly <gap/> of the<lb/> chances be all in favour of the doing less evil by the application<lb/> of it than would have place if no application were made<lb/>of it:  but <add>and</add> where there is no flexibility the chances against the <lb/>hitting the right <add><gap/></add> point are an infinity to one.  In these as<lb/>in other cases, the <gap/> arrive at may be <gap/>: but in this<lb/> as in other cases the state of things supposed by the objector would<lb/> be strangely different from that which is certified by <gap/><lb/> experience and observation, if the surest course for hitting is<lb/>made <gap/> by never aiming at it.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 13:10, 30 June 2019

Click Here To Edit

1825 Jany. 31

Procedure Code

Ch. Preface — Continue
§. General Review
Characteristic

File
Another characteristic
Flexibility

§. Characteristic of their system 1. Flexibility principle

Another characteristic of this system is its flexibility:
the provision it makes for minimizing evil in each
individual case according to the proportion as to the quantity of evil reasonably
to be expected in the different cases giving the preference sometimes either
to the direct or sometimes or to the collateral ends of justice.

The pr topics to which the diversification is susceptible
of being applied and is here applied accordingly may be thus
enumerated

Topics for diversification
1 Distance as to place
2 do as to time
3 Circumstances affecting
sensibility

Here collect them together: 1. Distance in the line of place.
2. in the line of time. 3. Circumstances affecting sensibility, as
per to Marr ʌ Legislation &c

Objections to flexibility
1. Danger from blameless
deception
2. Danger from of abuse
by erroneous judication

The only objection that principle — the flexibility has
open to it 1. charges of blameless deception in respect of the fa appropriate
facts : 2. charges of abuse by perpetually erroneous judicature
in relation to them

But evil from inflexibility
predominant
over evil from flexibility

But here as elsewhere in the account between good and
evil the to be considered is most absolute, always
relative and comparative. Compare then the evil
from flexibility with the evil from inflexibility. In case
of flexibility, the matter will be thoroughly of the
chances be all in favour of the doing less evil by the application
of it than would have place if no application were made
of it: but and where there is no flexibility the chances against the
hitting the right point are an infinity to one. In these as
in other cases, the arrive at may be : but in this
as in other cases the state of things supposed by the objector would
be strangely different from that which is certified by
experience and observation, if the surest course for hitting is
made by never aiming at it.



Identifier: | JB/057/251/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1825-01-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

251

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

18581

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in