JB/071/106/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/106/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/106/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/106/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<head>6 C</head>
 
<head>Of Polygamy.</head>
 
<p>under the auspices of the Laws. She is to be regarded therefore<lb/>
on the footing of a Widow. In point of reason she ought not to<lb/>
be regarded in a light in the least degree less favourable.<lb/>
But popular prejudice is seldom perfectly equitable to<lb/>
misfortune.</p>
 
<p>Next with regard to Sharping. It is not always that<lb/>
a Woman thus imposed upon suffers in her fortune. Perhaps<lb/>
she had none: the only bait that tempted the Offender was her<lb/>
person. It is only in case of her having had a fortune, and<lb/>
that fortune's having been dissipated by the Offender, that she<lb/>
is a sufferer in this way. In the account of dissipation, so<lb/>
much as it is supposed she would have expended had she<lb/>
remained single, must be deducted.</p>
 
<p>Quest. 1. Why criminal consciousness on the part of the second<lb/>
Wife is made an Excuse in favour of the Man.</p>
 
<head>Reasons.</head>
 
<p>The great mischief lies in the deceit put upon the Woman,<lb/>
and the disappointment which is apt to be the consequence. But<lb/>
in this case there is no deceit nor disappointment. It is a joint <add>contrivance</add></p>
 
<pb/>





Revision as of 22:37, 15 February 2012

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

6 C

Of Polygamy.

under the auspices of the Laws. She is to be regarded therefore
on the footing of a Widow. In point of reason she ought not to
be regarded in a light in the least degree less favourable.
But popular prejudice is seldom perfectly equitable to
misfortune.

Next with regard to Sharping. It is not always that
a Woman thus imposed upon suffers in her fortune. Perhaps
she had none: the only bait that tempted the Offender was her
person. It is only in case of her having had a fortune, and
that fortune's having been dissipated by the Offender, that she
is a sufferer in this way. In the account of dissipation, so
much as it is supposed she would have expended had she
remained single, must be deducted.

Quest. 1. Why criminal consciousness on the part of the second
Wife is made an Excuse in favour of the Man.

Reasons.

The great mischief lies in the deceit put upon the Woman,
and the disappointment which is apt to be the consequence. But
in this case there is no deceit nor disappointment. It is a joint contrivance


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/071/106/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

106

Info in main headings field

of polygamy

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23509

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in