★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1828. <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi></sic> 24 + <lb/> Law Amendments <del>on Duelling Extinguishable.</del></head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>C 18</p> <p><note>Propositions<lb/> <sic>Ch.</sic> iv Oath none</note></p> <p><note> | <head>1828. <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi></sic> 24 + <lb/> Law Amendments <del>on Duelling Extinguishable.</del></head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>C 18</p> <p><note>Propositions<lb/> <sic>Ch.</sic> iv Oath none</note></p> <p><note>Existing System<lb/>Sham pleas <unclear>interdicted</unclear><lb/> Worse pleas substituted</note></p> <!-- O in pencil besides marginal note numbers --> <p><note>1<lb/> Sham pleas <del>exter</del> abolished<lb/> worse pleas substituted</note></p> <p><del>To the</del> On the occasion of the lately undertaken<lb/> reform amongst other incongruities <add>those yet under consideration</add> the sort of pleas distinguished<lb/> from the rest by the name of <hi rend="underline">sham pleas</hi>. As<lb/> <gap/> these are intended was put: and what was the consequence:<lb/> so far from lessened delay vexation and expense<lb/> were <sic>encreased</sic>. How should it have been otherwise. These<lb/> were exactly the cases in which delay vexation and expense<lb/> were at a minimum. <del>Sham plea</del> The lying pleas called<lb/> Sham pleas were the shortest of all <del>plea</del> lying pleas:<lb/>and <del> all pleas</del> <add> will</add> without exception all pleas were and are<lb/> lying ones: driven out of this <del>least mischievous <gap/></del> <add> <gap/> and <gap/> expense</add> <lb/><del>fact:</del> stronghold of delay <add> <gap/> of facilities</add> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> were chosen perforce into others in which the stock of<lb/> that <sic>pretious</sic> commodity is inexhaustible.</p> <p><note><del>3</del>2<lb/> This must be as long as<lb/> pleading is continued</note></p> <p>Thus must it ever be so long as under the<lb/>mendacity laws what is called <hi rend="underline">pleading</hi> is continued</p> <p><note>3<lb/> The effect the consequence<lb/> if <sic>forseen</sic> of moral<lb/> if <sic>unforseen</sic> of intellectual<lb/> <sic>inaptitude</sic></note></p> <p>Was this effect seen then whereabouts <add>where</add> was moral<lb/> aptitude? was it unseen? — then where was intellectual aptitude? + <!-- see bottom of the page --></p> <p>Here then was a change and what change? From bad<lb/> to worse: and from <gap/> which could then <unclear>proceed</unclear> what better<lb/> can <add>generally</add> be expected?</p> <p>He who can not see, that which lying is <sic>authorized</sic><lb/> and rewarded lying will continue to be <sic>prehended,</sic> what is it<lb/> that he can see.</p> <p> + See a first material in <sic>Morn. Chron.</sic> for <sic> Jan</sic> <!-- blank space --> <gap/> 1828</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
1828. Jany. 24 +
Law Amendments on Duelling Extinguishable.
C 18
Propositions
Ch. iv Oath none
Existing System
Sham pleas interdicted
Worse pleas substituted
1
Sham pleas exter abolished
worse pleas substituted
To the On the occasion of the lately undertaken
reform amongst other incongruities those yet under consideration the sort of pleas distinguished
from the rest by the name of sham pleas. As
these are intended was put: and what was the consequence:
so far from lessened delay vexation and expense
were encreased. How should it have been otherwise. These
were exactly the cases in which delay vexation and expense
were at a minimum. Sham plea The lying pleas called
Sham pleas were the shortest of all plea lying pleas:
and all pleas will without exception all pleas were and are
lying ones: driven out of this least mischievous and expense
fact: stronghold of delay of facilities
were chosen perforce into others in which the stock of
that pretious commodity is inexhaustible.
32
This must be as long as
pleading is continued
Thus must it ever be so long as under the
mendacity laws what is called pleading is continued
3
The effect the consequence
if forseen of moral
if unforseen of intellectual
inaptitude
Was this effect seen then whereabouts where was moral
aptitude? was it unseen? — then where was intellectual aptitude? +
Here then was a change and what change? From bad
to worse: and from which could then proceed what better
can generally be expected?
He who can not see, that which lying is authorized
and rewarded lying will continue to be prehended, what is it
that he can see.
+ See a first material in Morn. Chron. for Jan 1828
|
Identifier: | JB/057/316/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1828-01-24 |
1-3 |
||
|
057 |
law amendment |
||
|
316 |
law amendment |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d18 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1827 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1827 |
|||
|
18646 |
|||
