JB/157/038/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/157/038/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 42: Line 42:


<p>IX. This the only<lb/>
<p>IX. This the only<lb/>
chance for improvement</p><pb/>
chance for improvement</p>
 
<p>Mode of Execution <lb/>
- must be<lb/>
independent of repugnants -</p><pb/>
 
 
<p><!-- Red ink -->I Condition</p>
 
<p><!-- Continue in black -->I</p>
 
<p>Quantity - Poor<lb/>
House included<lb/>
p.1</p>
 
<p>2</p>
<p>Condition - in respect<lb/>
of value of<lb/>
the Herbage. p.1</p>
 
<p>3</p>
<p>2- and multitude<lb/>
of the Commoners<lb/>
p.3.</p>
 
<p>4</p>
<p>3. - harbour afforded<lb/>
for seditious<lb/>
assemblies.<lb/>
p.3.</p>
 
<p>5</p>
 
<p>5</p>
<p>4 -multitude of<lb/>
public buildings<lb/>
of the manner cast<lb/>
in the immediate<lb/>
neighbourhood. p..5</p>
<pb/>
 
<p><!-- In red ink -->III Advantages</p>
<p><!-- Continue in black ink -->6</p>
 
The Penitentiary House would afford a positive security against malefactors, besides the negative one. p.7.  7 No spot can be freer from objection in the Score of the pretium affectionis. p.7. 8 except in the instance of the Paupers, whose affection should give way tot he good of the public which supports them. p.7. 9 In these very Parishes incomparably greater liberties were taken  with the pretium affectionis in the case of the Deans Yard Square Act. p.9. 10 The opposers of that Ac, in their remonstrances against the powers thereby created admitt the propriety  of such creation in a case like the present. p.11 11 That Act was found by high authority &amp; after great consideration. p.11

Revision as of 14:54, 22 August 2019

Click Here To Edit

I 1. Condition
1. Conclusion

paysac
II II. Right
II. Condition . . .

point of might
III Advantages
III III Improvements
III. Condition - improvement
it
would receive

V IV Hardship
IV. No more hardship
but a
contra

V V. Consent
V. Consent not

VI - not to be
expected

VIII therefore best
not to be applied
for

VI Square Act

VIIII Opposition on
stronger ground
was over ruled in
the Square Act

VII Only Chance

IX. This the only
chance for improvement

Mode of Execution
- must be
independent of repugnants -


---page break---


I Condition

I

Quantity - Poor
House included
p.1

2

Condition - in respect
of value of
the Herbage. p.1

3

2- and multitude
of the Commoners
p.3.

4

3. - harbour afforded
for seditious
assemblies.
p.3.

5

5

4 -multitude of
public buildings
of the manner cast
in the immediate
neighbourhood. p..5


---page break---

III Advantages

6

The Penitentiary House would afford a positive security against malefactors, besides the negative one. p.7. 7 No spot can be freer from objection in the Score of the pretium affectionis. p.7. 8 except in the instance of the Paupers, whose affection should give way tot he good of the public which supports them. p.7. 9 In these very Parishes incomparably greater liberties were taken with the pretium affectionis in the case of the Deans Yard Square Act. p.9. 10 The opposers of that Ac, in their remonstrances against the powers thereby created admitt the propriety of such creation in a case like the present. p.11 11 That Act was found by high authority & after great consideration. p.11

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in