★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
p.9.</p><pb/> | p.9.</p><pb/> | ||
13 | <p>13</p> | ||
Grounds of separation | <p>Grounds of separation<lb/> | ||
with respect | with respect<lb/> | ||
to males | to males<lb/> | ||
why not applied | why not applied<lb/> | ||
<del><gap/></del> to females | <del><gap/></del> to females<lb/> | ||
p.10 | p.10</p> | ||
14 | <p>14</p> | ||
Those which | <p>Those which<lb/> | ||
respect females | respect females<lb/> | ||
why not to | why not to <lb/> | ||
males. p.11 | males. p.11</p> | ||
15 | <p>15</p> | ||
Inefficacy of | <p>Inefficacy of<lb/> | ||
all separation | all separation<lb/> | ||
according to classes<lb/> | |||
owing to the<lb/> | |||
gradations and<lb/> | |||
<gap/>ches of<lb/> | |||
character in<lb/> | |||
the same class<lb/> | |||
being <gap/>rable<lb/> | |||
and indesirbable. p.11</p><pb/> | |||
1 | |||
Separation according | |||
to Classes | |||
essentially inadequate | |||
p.1 | |||
2 | |||
Points already | |||
proved | |||
1. My degree of | |||
seclusion adequate | |||
2. inviolably | |||
maintained | |||
3. More perfect than | |||
any other p.1 | |||
3 | |||
Separation Walls | |||
according to classes | according to classes | ||
exhibited in Plate | |||
<gap/> - why. p? | |||
4 | |||
Heads of observation | |||
for this | |||
section. p.3 | |||
5 | |||
Superiority of | |||
my mode of reparation | |||
according | |||
to classes over the | |||
common plans. | |||
p.3. | |||
Associations what | |||
principally regretted | |||
by Howard. | |||
6 | |||
Inefficacy of the | |||
separation presented | |||
by the Penitentiary | |||
Act in respect of | |||
promiscuous association | |||
p.4. | |||
1
When separation
into classes was first
thought of, that
into companies
which superseding
as was not. p.1
2
How far the common
plans push the
idea of separation
into classes. p.1.
3
Grounds for separation
1 among males,
experience & and ence
p.2
2- 4
2 - among females,
immodesty - p.2
5
Propriety of separating
old offenders
from raw. p 2.
As much as for
separating Debtors from
felons.
6
Insufficiencies of
such separation
considering the
association it involves
p.3
1 in respect of raw offenders
excepted
---page break---
7
1. in preventing
turbulence
2. Case of daring
raw offenders. p.4
8
2. in preventing
mischievous instruction
3. Case of Quiet
old offenders. p.5
9
4. Case of daring
old offenders. p.6
10
5 Case of House
-breakers p. 6
11
Females
6. Case of decent
females
7. Case of destitute
females
Grounds of separation
1. Danger of moral
corruption. p.7.
12
12
2. Present uneasiness
to the uncorrupted.
p.9.
---page break---
13
Grounds of separation
with respect
to males
why not applied
to females
p.10
14
Those which
respect females
why not to
males. p.11
15
Inefficacy of
all separation
according to classes
owing to the
gradations and
ches of
character in
the same class
being rable
and indesirbable. p.11
---page break---
1 Separation according to Classes essentially inadequate p.1
2 Points already proved 1. My degree of seclusion adequate 2. inviolably maintained 3. More perfect than any other p.1
3 Separation Walls according to classes exhibited in Plate - why. p?
4 Heads of observation for this section. p.3 5 Superiority of my mode of reparation according to classes over the common plans. p.3.
Associations what principally regretted by Howard.
6 Inefficacy of the separation presented by the Penitentiary Act in respect of promiscuous association p.4.
Identifier: | JB/157/040/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 157. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1-15, 1-18, 18a, 19-20, 1-9 |
|||
157 |
panopticon |
||
040 |
panopt. separate classes contents |
||
002 |
|||
marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
benjamin constant |
|||
53410 |
|||