★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
being no other, must here be mean:</p> | being no other, must here be mean:</p> | ||
—<lb/> | —<lb/> | ||
<p>The affirmative, not the negative, is the side in which<lb/> | |||
proof <del>in the</del> should in the first place be adduced. <del>To</del><add>On</add> him<lb/> | |||
who maintains the affirmative it is it is incumbent to bring<lb/> | |||
proof. Such is the acknowledged rule not only in the<lb/> | |||
field of local law but in the field of universal law is<lb/> | |||
a wind over the whole field of reason. If to this maxim<lb/> | |||
there be any exceptions, small indeed is their extent, nor<lb/> | |||
will the present case be found to be in the number of them.<lb/> | |||
We are accused of guilt. Guilt is is imparted to us: guilt<lb/> | |||
of thedeepest idea. Where is the proof? Not any. But the proof<lb/> | |||
where is it? No alone: non adduced. Non so much as attempted<lb/> | |||
to be likened. Yet condemnation follows: has followed here follows<lb/> | |||
just as if there had been proof and that proof compleat and conclusive.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
1819 Dec.20
Radicalism not
1. Accusatrata
§.3. Plan of their defence
3. Plan of this defence
or 4 1
discretion
acknowledged Of
the affirmative should
proof be given
To him who the affirmative belongs in the first place to
bring
Here, no such proof
attempted. Consequence
on the negative side
either silence or
proof of negative.
On every other occasion, with few exceptions of any
and then not afford to be found in the present
such not only field of to who but in the field of
caing it is not only of but of
all law and all knowledge is
universal and lty acknowledged reaal
it is by from time to who maintains the of proportion
that the proof of it of what he advance in to be found looked for
On the present occasion, on that side all endeavour to
find so much as an attempt at proof have been fruitless
Since Under those circumstances, if in the other side
an who ever it be to whom that affirmative presents itself
as erroneous and untenable, either he must remain silent,
suffering to go abroad as if it were salutary. true and unanswerable un
an open — which to him appears in the highest degree
pernicious, as well as erroneous, and untenable, or
he must engage in a task so difficultpregnant with difficulty and embarassingresment
as the proving in the negative. This course, then
being no other, must here be mean:
—
The affirmative, not the negative, is the side in which
proof in the should in the first place be adduced. ToOn him
who maintains the affirmative it is it is incumbent to bring
proof. Such is the acknowledged rule not only in the
field of local law but in the field of universal law is
a wind over the whole field of reason. If to this maxim
there be any exceptions, small indeed is their extent, nor
will the present case be found to be in the number of them.
We are accused of guilt. Guilt is is imparted to us: guilt
of thedeepest idea. Where is the proof? Not any. But the proof
where is it? No alone: non adduced. Non so much as attempted
to be likened. Yet condemnation follows: has followed here follows
just as if there had been proof and that proof compleat and conclusive.
Identifier: | JB/137/099/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1819-12-20 |
1 |
||
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
099 |
radicalism not |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c3 / d3 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]] |
||
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
1818 |
|||
46816 |
|||