★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>C <del>Personal Injuries</del> <sic>Miscell</sic></head> <note><sic>Inf.</sic></note><p>NOTE</p> <p><note>Malicious Mischief</note></p> <p>In <del>the</del> <add>England</add> English Law there are upwards <add>near/more than</add> xo Statute<lb/> against malicious mischief: <del>By</del> <add>With</add> the same <del>real</del> reason<lb/>these might have been xoo or xooo. A man <del>who</del> <add>whose</add><lb/> <del>cultivated turnips</del> <add>turnips were destroyed</add> bethought himself of <del>getting</del> applying<lb/>to Parliament for an extraordinary protection for his <del>property</del> <add> turnips.</add><lb/>He succeeded: <del>afterwards</del> his success suggested the same thought<lb/>to the cultivator of potatoes In these as in so many other<lb/>instances in the English Law it is not the Statesmen<lb/> who pen the Law, but the Attorney whose <sic>sollicitude</sic><lb/>is confined to the interests of his Client. It is the indolence <hi rend="superscript">2</hi><lb/> <del>and</del> <add>or</add> shortsightedness <hi rend="superscript">1</hi> of the <del><gap/></del> <add> Legislator</add>, and not the<lb/>exigency of the subject matter that makes Jurisprudence so<lb/>voluminous. The inescapable delegates of <foreign>Justinium</foreign> stuffed<lb/> their compilation in many places with provisions as<lb/>minute as these, and what is worse many of these contradictory.</p> <!-- line across the page. Text crossed through in ink --> <p><note>Offences against<lb/> the Law of Nations</note></p> <p>Offenders guilty of any <del><gap/></del> <add>committing affray</add> outrage to the person<lb/>of a foreign <del>wh</del> Antipodean or other <add>such</add> Minister<lb/>or to any person in his service <hi rend="underline">may</hi> be given<lb/>up to the Sovereign of that nation to be punished<lb/>as he shall think proper</p> <!-- line across the page. Text crossed through in ink --> <p><note>Perjury <sic> | <head>C <del>Personal Injuries</del> <sic>Miscell</sic></head> <note><sic>Inf.</sic></note><p>NOTE</p> <p><note>Malicious Mischief</note></p> <p>In <del>the</del> <add>England</add> English Law there are upwards <add>near/more than</add> xo Statute<lb/> against malicious mischief: <del>By</del> <add>With</add> the same <del>real</del> reason<lb/>these might have been xoo or xooo. A man <del>who</del> <add>whose</add><lb/> <del>cultivated turnips</del> <add>turnips were destroyed</add> bethought himself of <del>getting</del> applying<lb/>to Parliament for an extraordinary protection for his <del>property</del> <add> turnips.</add><lb/>He succeeded: <del>afterwards</del> his success suggested the same thought<lb/>to the cultivator of potatoes In these as in so many other<lb/>instances in the English Law it is not the Statesmen<lb/> who pen the Law, but the Attorney whose <sic>sollicitude</sic><lb/>is confined to the interests of his Client. It is the indolence <hi rend="superscript">2</hi><lb/> <del>and</del> <add>or</add> shortsightedness <hi rend="superscript">1</hi> of the <del><gap/></del> <add> Legislator</add>, and not the<lb/>exigency of the subject matter that makes Jurisprudence so<lb/>voluminous. The inescapable delegates of <foreign>Justinium</foreign> stuffed<lb/> their compilation in many places with provisions as<lb/>minute as these, and what is worse many of these contradictory.</p> <!-- line across the page. Text crossed through in ink --> <p><note>Offences against<lb/> the Law of Nations</note></p> <p>Offenders guilty of any <del><gap/></del> <add>committing affray</add> outrage to the person<lb/>of a foreign <del>wh</del> Antipodean or other <add>such</add> Minister<lb/>or to any person in his service <hi rend="underline">may</hi> be given<lb/>up to the Sovereign of that nation to be punished<lb/>as he shall think proper</p> <!-- line across the page. Text crossed through in ink --> <p><note>Perjury <sic>criminative</sic></note></p> <p>Punish criminat<add>ive</add> Perjury by the <foreign><unclear>Lux</unclear> Taliensis</foreign></p> <!-- line across the page --> <p><note>Robbery <add>5</add></note></p> <p>Robbery is an aggravation on two accounts. 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi><lb/>it produces additional mischief: 2<hi rend="superscript">dly</hi> it <del>is</del> <add>afford</add> an additional<lb/> <del>means of</del> <add> chance & that a very great one for</add> accomplishing the obnoxious purpose</p> <!-- line across the page. Text crossed though in ink --> <p><note><del>Evidence</del> <add>6</add><lb/>Hear Say good in<lb/> common life.</note></p> <p>In the trifling and ordinary concerns of life, we judge <add>determine</add><lb/>upon hearing evidence, not as looking upon it to be adequate,<lb/> but because <del><gap/> we do</del> either we have not the<lb/>means of obtaining or do not think it worth our while<lb/> to obtain <del>direct</del> <add> original</add> evidence.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
C Personal Injuries Miscell Inf.
NOTE
Malicious Mischief
In the England English Law there are upwards near/more than xo Statute
against malicious mischief: By With the same real reason
these might have been xoo or xooo. A man who whose
cultivated turnips turnips were destroyed bethought himself of getting applying
to Parliament for an extraordinary protection for his property turnips.
He succeeded: afterwards his success suggested the same thought
to the cultivator of potatoes In these as in so many other
instances in the English Law it is not the Statesmen
who pen the Law, but the Attorney whose sollicitude
is confined to the interests of his Client. It is the indolence 2
and or shortsightedness 1 of the Legislator, and not the
exigency of the subject matter that makes Jurisprudence so
voluminous. The inescapable delegates of Justinium stuffed
their compilation in many places with provisions as
minute as these, and what is worse many of these contradictory.
Offences against
the Law of Nations
Offenders guilty of any committing affray outrage to the person
of a foreign wh Antipodean or other such Minister
or to any person in his service may be given
up to the Sovereign of that nation to be punished
as he shall think proper
Perjury criminative
Punish criminative Perjury by the Lux Taliensis
Robbery 5
Robbery is an aggravation on two accounts. 1st
it produces additional mischief: 2dly it is afford an additional
means of chance & that a very great one for accomplishing the obnoxious purpose
Evidence 6
Hear Say good in
common life.
In the trifling and ordinary concerns of life, we judge determine
upon hearing evidence, not as looking upon it to be adequate,
but because we do either we have not the
means of obtaining or do not think it worth our while
to obtain direct original evidence.
|
Identifier: | JB/063/003/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
4-16 |
|||
|
063 |
penal code |
||
|
003 |
miscell. |
||
|
001 |
note |
||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
<f5> / f6 / f7 / <f8> |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::r williams [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
c. hamilton |
|||
|
20192 |
|||
