JB/137/104/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/104/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
another choice to be made.</p>
another choice to be made.</p>


Note in this place for illustration that which there will be<lb/>
<p>Note in this place for illustration that which there will be<lb/>
occasion <add>to bring to view in another place for the purpose of proof.</add> Of the case where, in the accomplishment of a <lb/>
occasion <add>to bring to view in another place for the purpose of proof.</add> Of the case where, in the accomplishment of a <lb/>
design found by the body of the people, the constituted<lb/>
design found by the body of the people, the constituted <note>5<lb/>
Of the accomplishment<lb/>
of a design of the<lb/>
people by reluctant<lb/>
constituted authorities<lb/>
Ireland A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 1782<lb/>
as example.  See<lb/>
Part IV</note><lb/>
authorities, against the their own known and declared<lb/>
authorities, against the their own known and declared<lb/>
inclination even made instruments,- Ireland, on<lb/>
inclination even made instruments,- Ireland, on<lb/>
Line 37: Line 44:
that, <del>to the examples entertaining the sort</del> <add><del>formation of such</del> of</add> a design<lb/>
that, <del>to the examples entertaining the sort</del> <add><del>formation of such</del> of</add> a design<lb/>
<add>such as the proposed radical reform</add> <del>in <gap/> question</del> a change in the form of government<lb/>
<add>such as the proposed radical reform</add> <del>in <gap/> question</del> a change in the form of government<lb/>
<add>in any other respect</add> would not of necessity <del>be</del><add>be</add> a part.
<add>in any other respect</add> would not of necessity <del>be</del><add>be</add> a part.</p>  
 
 
 
<note>5<lb/>
Of the accomplishment<lb/>
of a design of the<lb/>
people by reluctant<lb/>
constituted authorities<lb/>
Ireland A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 1782<lb/>
as example.  See<lb/>
Part IV</note><lb/>


<note>6<lb/>
<note>6<lb/>
Line 59: Line 55:
were agreed in that<lb/>
were agreed in that<lb/>
points.</note><lb/>
points.</note><lb/>
<p>Not to look out <add>at present</add> for any more, there are among the<lb/>
points about which, in a design of <del><gap/></del><add>the</add> just <add>charged</add> could<lb/>
be so much as found &#x2014; not to <gap/> of its being acted<lb/>
upon &#x2014; in agreement must have been some to by all<lb/>
the general individuals engaged in it. <add>[+]</add> <del>unless it suits</del> <note><add>[+]</add> If there be any alternative,<lb/>
it must be<lb/>
this: namely<lb/>
&#x2014;</note>
that, such <del>uses</del> <add>has been</add> the influence of certain leaders, <del>that</del><lb/>
all the rests <add>have been</add> <del>were</del> under an agreement, to act in a state<lb/>
of blind and <del>presevering</del> <add>persevering</add> obsequiousness to whatever design<lb/>
such leaders shall from time to time <del>been</del><add>have</add> formed. <add>But</add> <del><gap/></del><lb/>
even in tis case, these same points would remain to be agreed<lb/>
upon by these leaders among themselves: unless for the first<lb/>
they had agreed to <add>repose</add><del>respect</del> <add>and part</add> <del>these alone</del> <add>themselves</add> with that same degree of <add>blindness</add> <note>blindness under the<lb/>
dominion of some<lb/>
one de<gap/>: <del><gap/></del><lb/>
<del>will hardly have</del><lb/>
<del>been supposed</del>.<lb/>
<del><gap/> state of things of which</del><lb/>
a supposition which it<lb/>
is balanced the universally<lb/>
known facts will hardly be thought to <add>admitt of</add> <del><gap/></del></note></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:19, 29 December 2019

Click Here To Edit

1819 Decr 19

Radicalism not dangerous

§ 1. of the case
Concl necessary


4
Therefore, either
design. Case existing
constituted authorities
with the existing
of names and functions
as to be employed,
is a be
framed

The consequence is - that, of the design as charged, in question,
either one point is — either that the countenance of the existing constituted authorities, under
their present names, and charged with their present
functions, must have or the establishment of a new set of constituted
authorities with correspondent names and functions.
much has been included Here then will have been
another choice to be made.

Note in this place for illustration that which there will be
occasion to bring to view in another place for the purpose of proof. Of the case where, in the accomplishment of a
design found by the body of the people, the constituted 5
Of the accomplishment
of a design of the
people by reluctant
constituted authorities
Ireland Ao 1782
as example. See
Part IV

authorities, against the their own known and declared
inclination even made instruments,- Ireland, on
the occasion of the emancipation of the Irish for
Parliament from the British in the year 1782, afforded
an example. And by this example it will be seen to be is proved,
that, to the examples entertaining the sort formation of such of a design
such as the proposed radical reform in question a change in the form of government
in any other respect would not of necessity bebe a part.

6
Such must have been
the points in
unless all the leader
meant to act in blind
obsequiousness to the
leaders, and the leader
were agreed in that
points.

Not to look out at present for any more, there are among the
points about which, in a design of the just charged could
be so much as found — not to of its being acted
upon — in agreement must have been some to by all
the general individuals engaged in it. [+] unless it suits [+] If there be any alternative,
it must be
this: namely
that, such uses has been the influence of certain leaders, that
all the rests have been were under an agreement, to act in a state
of blind and presevering persevering obsequiousness to whatever design
such leaders shall from time to time beenhave formed. But
even in tis case, these same points would remain to be agreed
upon by these leaders among themselves: unless for the first
they had agreed to reposerespect and part these alone themselves with that same degree of blindness blindness under the
dominion of some
one de:
will hardly have
been supposed.
state of things of which
a supposition which it
is balanced the universally
known facts will hardly be thought to admitt of




Identifier: | JB/137/104/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

4-6

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

104

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1816

Notes public

ID Number

46821

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in