JB/008/136/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/008/136/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>(4.)</head><lb/> <p>If, to any person, the truth of the here averred<lb/> encrease, of the ratio of loss to profit, on each in<lb/> -stance of past separation, presents itself as<lb/> exposed</p> <head>Note @ contin?</head><lb/> <p>6. Annual aggregate of such particular Expen-<lb/> -diture for the 20 provinces will thus be R. <unclear>V.</unclear> 200,000,000.<lb/> </p> <p>7. Antecedently to any separation, total<lb/>annual amount of universally -ap-<lb/> -plying and particularly-applying expen-<lb/> -diture together will thus be</p>  
<head>(4.)</head><lb/> <p>If, to any person, the truth of the here averred<lb/> encrease, of the ratio of loss to profit, on each in<lb/> -stance of past separation, presents itself as<lb/> exposed</p> <head>Note @ contin?</head><lb/> <p>6. Annual aggregate of such particular Expen-<lb/> -diture for the 20 provinces will thus be R. <unclear>V.</unclear> 200,000,000.<lb/> </p> <p>7. Antecedently to any separation, total<lb/>annual amount of universally -ap-<lb/> -plying and particularly-applying expen-<lb/> -diture together will thus be .... 400,000,000.</p>
<p>Thus as to <hi rend="underline">expenditure</hi>: in the language of Book<lb/>-keeping, loss.</p>
<p>Now as to <hi rend="underline">profit</hi>: since for the pourpose of the ar<lb/>-gument in despite of probability, existece of a profit</p><lb/>must be supposed. Antecedently to the first separa<lb/>tion, profit (say) <hi rend="underline">exactly equal</hi> to loss: say then R.V.<lb/>400,000,000.
 
<p>1. State of the account at the end of the firsts year, after<lb/>separation of the province first departed.<lb/>Total Expenditure ------ 390,000,000<lb/>Total Receipt ------ 380,000,000.<lb/>Ratio of los to profit as 39 to 38.</p>
<p>2. On the second separation, it will be as 38 to 36: that is, as<lb/>19 to 18.</p>
<p>3. On the third separation, as 37 to 34.</p>
<p>4. On the fourt as 36 to 32: that is as 18 to 16; or 9 to 8.<lb/>To continue the series further would be need-<lb/>-less. From what has been seen, it will be sufficiently<lb/>evident that, at the point of time immediately preceding<lb/>the last separation of the <hi rend="underline">twenty</hi>, the ratio of loss<lb/>to profit will have been as 20 to 1.</p>
<p>End of the note.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 17:12, 2 April 2021

Click Here To Edit

(4.)

If, to any person, the truth of the here averred
encrease, of the ratio of loss to profit, on each in
-stance of past separation, presents itself as
exposed

Note @ contin?

6. Annual aggregate of such particular Expen-
-diture for the 20 provinces will thus be R. V. 200,000,000.

7. Antecedently to any separation, total
annual amount of universally -ap-
-plying and particularly-applying expen-
-diture together will thus be .... 400,000,000.

Thus as to expenditure: in the language of Book
-keeping, loss.

Now as to profit: since for the pourpose of the ar
-gument in despite of probability, existece of a profit


must be supposed. Antecedently to the first separa
tion, profit (say) exactly equal to loss: say then R.V.
400,000,000.

1. State of the account at the end of the firsts year, after
separation of the province first departed.
Total Expenditure ------ 390,000,000
Total Receipt ------ 380,000,000.
Ratio of los to profit as 39 to 38.

2. On the second separation, it will be as 38 to 36: that is, as
19 to 18.

3. On the third separation, as 37 to 34.

4. On the fourt as 36 to 32: that is as 18 to 16; or 9 to 8.
To continue the series further would be need-
-less. From what has been seen, it will be sufficiently
evident that, at the point of time immediately preceding
the last separation of the twenty, the ratio of loss
to profit will have been as 20 to 1.

End of the note.



Identifier: | JB/008/136/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 8.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

008

Main Headings

rid yourselves of ultramaria

Folio number

136

Info in main headings field

Image

004

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

12

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

(c1 - c12)

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman 1820

Marginals

Paper Producer

john flowerdew colls

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1820

Notes public

ID Number

3240

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in