★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <head>1828 <sic>Oct.</sic> 10<lb/>Blackstone or say Civil Code</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>4<lb/>(1 <note><sic>Ch.</sic> Obligatory Dealings<lb/><gap/></note></p> <p><add>From any correspondent and opposite wrong, whatever is<lb?>right, may by the light of <hi rend="underline">contrast</hi> be made to receive an<lb/>instructive and relatively useful elucidation.</add></p> <p><note>For assistance take Bonaparte's<lb/>Code — an english<lb/>one <sic>w<hi rend="superscript">d</hi></sic> have been preferred<lb/>but none exists: mode of action<lb/>two sorts Statute &<lb/>Common Law, his <gap/><lb/>existing has no <hi rend="underline">order</hi>.</note></p> <p>For elucidation — for assistance for conception and resolution —<lb/>let us on this occasion take in hand Bonaparte's<lb/>Code. For in and by that Code, orders such as it is is<lb/>given to the several subject matters treated of in it. For highest<lb/>readers an English Code had there ben such a thing would<lb/>of course been preferred. But in England no such thing is in<lb/>existence. In England — and for highest subjects whoever,<lb/>the rule of action is composed of two sorts of so called<lb/>law. The Statute law which has existence, but <del>has not</del><lb/>as to order has not any but that which has been given to its<lb/>parts by the time at which they have respectively received<lb/>existence: and the so called Common Law <add>of</add> which, <add>it</add> not being<lb/>so much in existence is <del>then</del> not to such that <hi rend="underline">order</hi> in<lb/>any shape, as to be found in it.</p> <p><del><gap/></del> Well Bonaparte accordingly, and his <gap/><lb/><del><gap/> <gap//></del> on this occasion and for this purpose are made<lb/>content ourselves</p> <p><note>1. Obligatory dealings<lb/>are either Promises, or Conveyances.<lb/>No such distinction<lb/>by Bonaparte.</note></p> <p>1 First as to obligatory dealings. That under <add>in</add> one<lb/>or other of two classes designated by the appellation of Obligatory<lb/>Promises and Conveyances all obligatory dealings are composed<lb/>and have <gap/> <gap/> and different they are each <add>the one</add> from the<lb/>other, has just been <sic>shewn</sic>. Of no such distinction does any<lb/>clear conception appear to have been entertained by Bonaparte.</p> <p>☞ In the course of the <gap/> speak of his silence in regard to simple<lb/>pacts and simple conveyances, and his putting sale before <hi rend="underline">barter</hi> then<lb/>his putting the almost most complex obligation for <gap/> <hi rend="underline">marriage</hi> before <del><gap/></del> two so simple<lb/>ones — <hi rend="underline">barter</hi> and <hi rend="underline">sale</hi></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1828 Oct. 10
Blackstone or say Civil Code
4
(1 Ch. Obligatory Dealings
From any correspondent and opposite wrong, whatever is<lb?>right, may by the light of contrast be made to receive an
instructive and relatively useful elucidation.
For assistance take Bonaparte's
Code — an english
one wd have been preferred
but none exists: mode of action
two sorts Statute &
Common Law, his
existing has no order.
For elucidation — for assistance for conception and resolution —
let us on this occasion take in hand Bonaparte's
Code. For in and by that Code, orders such as it is is
given to the several subject matters treated of in it. For highest
readers an English Code had there ben such a thing would
of course been preferred. But in England no such thing is in
existence. In England — and for highest subjects whoever,
the rule of action is composed of two sorts of so called
law. The Statute law which has existence, but has not
as to order has not any but that which has been given to its
parts by the time at which they have respectively received
existence: and the so called Common Law of which, it not being
so much in existence is then not to such that order in
any shape, as to be found in it.
Well Bonaparte accordingly, and his
<gap//> on this occasion and for this purpose are made
content ourselves
1. Obligatory dealings
are either Promises, or Conveyances.
No such distinction
by Bonaparte.
1 First as to obligatory dealings. That under in one
or other of two classes designated by the appellation of Obligatory
Promises and Conveyances all obligatory dealings are composed
and have and different they are each the one from the
other, has just been shewn. Of no such distinction does any
clear conception appear to have been entertained by Bonaparte.
☞ In the course of the speak of his silence in regard to simple
pacts and simple conveyances, and his putting sale before barter then
his putting the almost most complex obligation for marriage before two so simple
ones — barter and sale
Identifier: | JB/031/041/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 31. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1828-10-10 |
not numbered |
||
031 |
civil code |
||
041 |
blackstone or say civil code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d4 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
9727 |
|||