★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
of every kind <add>we have already seen</add> is a property naturally to be expected<lb/> from a Judge: in any sort of Judge it has been<lb/> improved in a variety of ways <add>more ways than one</add>: by <gap/> <add>unity</add><lb/> by extraordinary dignity, <del>and</del> by exclusion from all<lb/> other offices, and by constancy of occupation. Each<lb/> Juryman therefore though in an humble sphere<lb/> may be expected to have <add><unclear>inborn</unclear></add> a larger map of<lb/> connection than a Judge. But to one Judge<lb/> there are twelve Jurymen. There is therefore<lb/> more than twelve times the danger of a want of<lb/> <del>and</del> indifference on the part of the Jury than<lb/><add>This already <unclear>assumes</unclear><lb/> probability of a want of indifference is therefore in the Jury multiplied by twelve.</add> on the part of the Judge.<note>And Jurymen <del>are</del> naturally are and indeed ought to be collected <gap/> from all the <add>many</add> different parts of the <del>country</del> county: so that if there be a ferment in any part, some <unclear>spice</unclear> of it is likely to be found in every Jury </note> What is more, the<lb/> violent the partiality the more likely it<lb/> is to prevail: for the obstinacy will be as the partiality,<lb/> and in an English Jury the most obstinate<lb/> is master of the prize. The mischief <add>danger</add> it is<lb/> <unclear>done</unclear> <del>would be</del> owes much of its <unclear>iniquitude</unclear>, as<lb/> we <gap/> to the <unclear>bane</unclear> of unanimity. But it is<lb/> under this law with this law belonging to it<lb/> on <add>to</add> the system as it stands, with this law forming<lb/> part of it that the <del>advantage in point of deff</del> <add><del>encomium</del><add>praise of <gap/></add></add><lb/> and <gap/> is thus bestowed. | <p>of every kind <add>we have already seen</add> is a property naturally to be expected<lb/> from a Judge: in any sort of Judge it has been<lb/> improved in a variety of ways <add>more ways than one</add>: by <gap/> <add>unity</add><lb/> by extraordinary dignity, <del>and</del> by exclusion from all<lb/> other offices, and by constancy of occupation. Each<lb/> Juryman therefore though in an humble sphere<lb/> may be expected to have <add><unclear>inborn</unclear></add> a larger map of<lb/> connection than a Judge. But to one Judge<lb/> there are twelve Jurymen. There is therefore<lb/> more than twelve times the danger of a want of<lb/> <del>and</del> indifference on the part of the Jury than<lb/><add>This already <unclear>assumes</unclear><lb/> probability of a want of indifference is therefore in the Jury multiplied by twelve.</add> on the part of the Judge.<note>And Jurymen <del>are</del> naturally are and indeed ought to be collected <gap/> from all the <add>many</add> different parts of the <del>country</del> county: so that if there be a ferment in any part, some <unclear>spice</unclear> of it is likely to be found in every Jury </note> What is more, the<lb/> more violent the partiality the more likely it<lb/> is to prevail: for the obstinacy will be as the partiality,<lb/> and in an English Jury the most obstinate<lb/> is master of the prize. The mischief <add>danger</add> it is<lb/> <unclear>done</unclear> <del>would be</del> owes much of its <unclear>iniquitude</unclear>, as<lb/> we <gap/> to the <unclear>bane</unclear> of unanimity. But it is<lb/> under this law with this law belonging to it<lb/> on <add>to</add> the system as it stands, with this law forming<lb/> part of it that the <del>advantage in point of deff</del> <add><del>encomium</del><add>praise of <gap/></add></add><lb/> and <gap/> is thus bestowed. </p> | ||
of every kind we have already seen is a property naturally to be expected
from a Judge: in any sort of Judge it has been
improved in a variety of ways more ways than one: by unity
by extraordinary dignity, and by exclusion from all
other offices, and by constancy of occupation. Each
Juryman therefore though in an humble sphere
may be expected to have inborn a larger map of
connection than a Judge. But to one Judge
there are twelve Jurymen. There is therefore
more than twelve times the danger of a want of
and indifference on the part of the Jury than
This already assumes
probability of a want of indifference is therefore in the Jury multiplied by twelve. on the part of the Judge.And Jurymen are naturally are and indeed ought to be collected from all the many different parts of the country county: so that if there be a ferment in any part, some spice of it is likely to be found in every Jury What is more, the
more violent the partiality the more likely it
is to prevail: for the obstinacy will be as the partiality,
and in an English Jury the most obstinate
is master of the prize. The mischief danger it is
done would be owes much of its iniquitude, as
we to the bane of unanimity. But it is
under this law with this law belonging to it
on to the system as it stands, with this law forming
part of it that the advantage in point of deff encomium<add>praise of </add>
and is thus bestowed.
Identifier: | JB/035/065/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
035 |
constitutional code; evidence; procedure code |
||
065 |
|||
002 |
|||
text sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
f9 / f10 |
||
jeremy bentham |
floyd & co |
||
arthur young |
|||
10658 |
|||