JB/051/001/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/051/001/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
trying this out.
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/001/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/001/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>PROCEDURE EVIDENCE Number.</head>
 
<p>The Law that makes two witnesses necessary<lb/>
to conviction, is a license to committ all imaginable<lb/>
villainies in the sight of one.</p>
 
<p>It is less improbable that a man will <add>has</add> committ<lb/>
any given crime, than that another<lb/>
will swear it upon him falsely.</p>
 
<p>It is more probable that 100 murders will<lb/>
be committed if men know that one<add>a <unclear>single</unclear></add><lb/>
witness will not be heard in proof of them,<lb/>
than it is that one <del><gap/></del> execution <add>of an <unclear>innocent man</unclear> </add> should<lb/>
take place from the trusting to a single <lb/>
witness.</p>


<p><del>If we æstimate still more accurately, we<lb/>
may say, that it is an improbability still</del>
<note>a hundred times<lb/>
more improbable</note>
N. B. The chance of <add>for</add> Perjury that still remains<lb/>
when 2 witnesses are conclusive, &amp; the chance<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>against</hi> Perjury when one is, by his testimony being<lb/>
<unclear>overborne</unclear> by opposite evidence, are left to be taken into<lb/>
the account.
<note>A Law requiring<lb/>
two begets a <lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>false reliance</hi><lb/>
upon number.</note>
</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:25, 17 April 2012

Click Here To Edit

PROCEDURE EVIDENCE Number.

The Law that makes two witnesses necessary
to conviction, is a license to committ all imaginable
villainies in the sight of one.

It is less improbable that a man will has committ
any given crime, than that another
will swear it upon him falsely.

It is more probable that 100 murders will
be committed if men know that onea single
witness will not be heard in proof of them,
than it is that one execution of an innocent man should
take place from the trusting to a single
witness.

If we æstimate still more accurately, we
may say, that it is an improbability still
a hundred times
more improbable
N. B. The chance of for Perjury that still remains
when 2 witnesses are conclusive, & the chance
against Perjury when one is, by his testimony being
overborne by opposite evidence, are left to be taken into
the account. A Law requiring
two begets a
false reliance
upon number.



Identifier: | JB/051/001/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

001

Info in main headings field

procedure evidence number

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16166

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in