JB/042/171/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/171/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
1
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1823 Sept. 13 Seen 1827 Feb 24</p>
<head>Constitutional Code</head>
<note>III. <lb/>
Rationale<lb/>
Ch XII Judicative Collectively<lb/>
S.1 Preliminary Observations<lb/>
Instructional</note><lb/>


<note>1<lb/>
In regard to<lb/>
retribution to Judicial<lb/>
functionaries legislation<lb/>
has to steer between<lb/>
two opposite dangers<lb/>
misdecision by inattention <lb/>
- and vexation<lb/>
<unclear>expeanadeling</unclear></note><lb/>
<head>Instructional</head>
In regard to the <gap/><add>retribution</add> to be allowed to the several<lb/>
members of the Judicial Establishment, the legislation has to<lb/>
<gap/> between his opposite <add>evil</add>danger: namely misdecision<lb/>
correspondant and opposite to the many end of justice misdecision<lb/>
through worst of attention on their parts respectively and  vexation<lb/>
expensed delay vexation and expense, through a sinister<lb/>
direction given to them respective vexations:namely expense <add>to make</add><lb/>
<note>2<lb/>
By the situation<lb/>
of Judges &amp; their Deputies<lb/>
under this Code<lb/>
no considerable<lb/>
difficulty</note>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 15:47, 25 November 2021

Click Here To Edit

1823 Sept. 13 Seen 1827 Feb 24

Constitutional Code III.
Rationale
Ch XII Judicative Collectively
S.1 Preliminary Observations
Instructional

1
In regard to
retribution to Judicial
functionaries legislation
has to steer between
two opposite dangers
misdecision by inattention
- and vexation
expeanadeling

Instructional In regard to the retribution to be allowed to the several
members of the Judicial Establishment, the legislation has to
between his opposite evildanger: namely misdecision
correspondant and opposite to the many end of justice misdecision
through worst of attention on their parts respectively and vexation
expensed delay vexation and expense, through a sinister
direction given to them respective vexations:namely expense to make



2
By the situation
of Judges & their Deputies
under this Code
no considerable
difficulty



Identifier: | JB/042/171/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1823-09-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

171

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

instructional

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13094

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in