JB/042/260/001

Click Here To Edit

1826. Decr. 21 Constitutional Code.

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively §.5. Number in a Judicatory

5

Worth a F , is there to sum up the numbers at the c (labour) an end may in B

Art. 4. continued

Number of Judges in the highest and most influential Judicatory — the law Royale, no fewer than 56 where of Presidents 6,[+] [+] Salary from 18,000 a year: £450: of this Judicatories, the expence from Judicatory Judges that number 50 many times multiplied: Yet under such over and above the additional expence if the addition if any made to President's salaries. Yet, under such a cond, who can say but, in the character of a which to arbitrary power and misrule, — the power of the legislative assemblies being rather a cover and cloak and a coat of mail for it than a bridle, — even than expence may be well employed. As to the money if not wasted were it not wasted in Judges it might D be wasted in Jesuits.

Y Jeremy Bentham

Presidents pay Judges 50

Neither reflect of P or of his Department

Art. 5. In the case By the allotment of a number greater than needful in each Judicatory, the ends of justice are contravened in another way through the medium of the expense. Scarcely a

11 Art. 11. 9. To France is confined the inadequate counter benefit of a mult many seated judicatory — a weakly efficient contract on the Minister interest of the Monarch by strength given by multiplicity of Judges to the controul applicate by the Judicial Establishment: and the negative

Ratiocinative. Instructional. Art. 4. If, any where, in France for instance any advantage beneficial effects in any shape are produced by multiplicity of Judges, it is the benefit belongs not to judication but to legislation; and in the present case has no place. It consists in the feeble addition which in that case my incidentally has come to be applied to the a widely insufficient controul, applied by that c to the power of the Monarch: it consists in a sort of virtual negative exercised by the members of the Judicatory, exercised by them at their peril, and never without more or less of self sacrifice. Under the form of government this negative was applied to the law itself before enactment: under the present form of government, it can not any otherwise be applied, than in this or that individual individual case under the law, after its enactment.

is in Numbers exercisable in laws.

more in the case of those whose distance from is greatest

Identifier: | JB/042/260/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1826-12-21	Marginal Summary Numbering	11
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	260	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles	note b continued / ratiocinative instructional
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d5 / e5
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1826
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1826
Notes public		ID Number	13183
Box Contents