JB/042/311/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:58, 31 August 2022

1826. Augt.

Constitutional Code Ch. XII Judiciary collectively
S.8. Function common to all
Judges
§. or 9. Elimination functions
Inoperation universalized why
Conestiation Courts
9
No reason why the
saving made there should
not be made under the
here proposed system

But were as to the saving of thought proper to be ide their same
no reason appears for supposing that under the here proposed system
it might not be made

Of the probability of such economy that any example
affords any strongly presana evidence. Serving in that way
only as are in a crowd - his influence then as more than functionary
- that influencing natural unclothed<add>unfortified</add> with any imperative and
coercive power would cut the same be equally made to render
that same service also standing advised by that
supremelyinviting attribution

10
Of the economy resulting
from proposed system
strong presumptive
evidence

But it will be and all their generous may their same two
reasons for supposing that there was a , who to this
work of generous superating ever gave the whole of his time
would on one done; another, or another; just as each
found most

11
Though remuneration
given it is cut down to
the smallest portion the
each person will be
content to take

Identifier: \| JB/042/311/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1826-08	Marginal Summary Numbering	9-12
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	311	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e3
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1824
Marginals		Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public		ID Number	13234
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
+<p>1826. Aug<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi></p>
+<head>Constitutional Code</head>
+<note>Ch. XII Judiciary collectively<lb/>
+S.8. Function common to all<lb/>
+Judges<lb/>
+&sect;. <hi rend="superscript">or</hi> 9. Elimination functions<lb/>
+Inoperation universalized why<lb/>
+Conestiation Courts<lb/>
+<lb/>
+No reason why the<lb/>
+saving made there should<lb/>
+not be made under the<lb/>
+here proposed system</note><lb/>
+<p>But were <add>as to</add> the saving of thought proper to be <gap/>ide their same<lb/>
+no reason <add>appears</add> for supposing that under the here proposed system<lb/>
+it might not be made</p>
+<p>Of the probability of such economy that any <unclear>example</unclear><lb/>
+affords any strongly presana<gap/> evidence.  Serving in that way<lb/>
+only as are in a crowd - his influence then as more than functionary <lb/>
+- that influencing natural <add>unclothed<add>unfortified</add></add> with any <gap/> imperative and<lb/>
+coercive power would cut the same <gap/> be equally made to render<lb/>
+that same service also standing <gap/> <gap/> advised by that<lb/>
+<add>supremely</add>inviting attribution</p>
+<note>10<lb/>
+Of the economy resulting<lb/>
+from proposed system<lb/>
+strong presumptive <lb/>
+evidence</note><lb/>
+<p>But it will be and <gap/> all their <add>generous</add> may their same two<lb/>
+reasons for supposing that there was a <gap/> <gap/>, who to this<lb/>
+work of generous super<gap/>ating ever gave the whole of his time<lb/>
+<gap/> would <gap/> on one done; another, or another; just as each<lb/>
+found most <gap/></p>
+<note>11<lb/>
+Though remuneration<lb/>
+given it is cut down to<lb/>
+the smallest portion <del>the</del><lb/>
+each person will be<lb/>
+content to take</note><lb/>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Views

JB/042/311/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:58, 31 August 2022

Navigation

Search