JB/042/419/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/419/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
1825 Oct. 30 1825 Nov. 6
Constitutional Code


++ 8
Copd
8
Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively
&sect;.20. Eventually-0emendative
function
Individual amendment &#x2014; proposed
Not for Netherlands
Not this time
for the Netherlands
Enactive (1)
Art. 19. Art. 20. Only for some alledged oversight in the
wording, in consequence of which the words employed
fail, is is supposed, of being expressive either of the
desire actually entertained by the draughtsman and the
legislature, or of the desire which it is believed would
have been thereby entertained by them, if and the circumstances
alledged as the mentioned as grounds or forming the ground or justificatory cause of the demand for the amendment
had been respectively present to their minds can any as it expected
that <gap/> only for amendments of this description is it expected that any
such proposition, if made, will be received by the Judge.
Transpose
(3) Instructional
Art. 21. Art. 22. Art. 18. If at any time in any Judicatory or p<gap/> the law
such extraneous proposed amendments should encrease in number in such sort
as to occupy too much <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> a greater portion of the time of Judges <note>than can be conveniently
allotted for this collective
purpose, it will be <gap/>
among the cares of the
legislature to repress
the excess by such conditions
as shall be deemed
apposite: for example by
requiring on every occasion
in addition to the applicant
one or more responsible Law practitioners
at his desire.</note>
Art. 17. No such proposition is receivable unless
signed either by <gap/> <gap/> the signature Judge prindipal, or some Law practitioner
practising in the Judicatory <gap/><gap/><gap/> submitted
over and above <gap/> that of <gap/><gap/><gap/> of
any by whom it is has been brought forward.
2
Enactive Ratiocinative
Art. 20. Art. 17




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 08:31, 14 January 2023

Click Here To Edit

1825 Oct. 30 1825 Nov. 6 Constitutional Code

++ 8 Copd 8

Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively §.20. Eventually-0emendative function

Individual amendment — proposed Not for Netherlands

Not this time for the Netherlands

Enactive (1) Art. 19. Art. 20. Only for some alledged oversight in the wording, in consequence of which the words employed fail, is is supposed, of being expressive either of the desire actually entertained by the draughtsman and the legislature, or of the desire which it is believed would have been thereby entertained by them, if and the circumstances alledged as the mentioned as grounds or forming the ground or justificatory cause of the demand for the amendment had been respectively present to their minds can any as it expected that only for amendments of this description is it expected that any such proposition, if made, will be received by the Judge.

Transpose

(3) Instructional Art. 21. Art. 22. Art. 18. If at any time in any Judicatory or p the law such extraneous proposed amendments should encrease in number in such sort as to occupy too much a greater portion of the time of Judges than can be conveniently allotted for this collective purpose, it will be among the cares of the legislature to repress the excess by such conditions as shall be deemed apposite: for example by requiring on every occasion in addition to the applicant one or more responsible Law practitioners at his desire.

Art. 17. No such proposition is receivable unless signed either by the signature Judge prindipal, or some Law practitioner practising in the Judicatory submitted over and above that of of any by whom it is has been brought forward.

2 Enactive Ratiocinative Art. 20. Art. 17



Identifier: | JB/042/419/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1825-10-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

419

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

individual amendment-proposers / enactive / instructional / enactive ratiocinative

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / d8 / e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"not for netherlands / not this time for the netherlands" [note in jb's hand] "copd"]]

ID Number

13342

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in