JB/042/444/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/444/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1824. July 11</p>
 
<head>Constitutional Code.</head>
<note>Ch.XII Judiciary collectively<lb/>
S.18. Preinterpretative function</note><lb/>


<p>By the applicant, if he thinks fit, may the terms of the amendmant<lb/>
be proposed: in this case the Judge employs either those<lb/>
same words, or others at his choice: <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> he is alike responsible<lb/>
for them in either case</p>
<note>8<lb/>
Art.8 Rather to reform<lb/>
<add>particular</add> over<gap/> made in legislation<lb/>
than to introduce<lb/>
in this mode<lb/>
ext<gap/> alteration is<lb/>
the object of the pa<gap/><lb/>
thus conferred.<lb/>
Not more matter than<lb/>
would occupy [one<lb/>
fault] part of a page<lb/>
in the <add>official</add> edition of the<lb/>
Code in question will<lb/>
any such proposed amendment<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> consort<lb/>
or <unclear>experage</unclear>. </note><lb/>
<p>Any part of the law may give rise to the <unclear>exercises</unclear> of<lb/>
this function on the part of the Judge whether <unclear>spontaneousily</unclear><lb/>
or obtainperatively exercised. But if it be the Constitutional<lb/>
<del>the J</del> without reference either to the penal ot the <add><del><gap/></del></add>nonpenal<lb/>
called Civil branch he will <add>rather</add> receive and it be an applicant<lb/>
to apply to some Member of the Legislature for the purpose<lb/>
rather than himself takes cognizance of it.</p>
<note>9<lb/>
Art.9 Of the creature<lb/>
of this person, the <gap/><lb/>
is to give to every Judge<lb/>
and <gap/>ive, and ever<lb/>
more an <gap/><lb/>
<add>as</add> to every part of the field<lb/>
of law.<lb/>
But on the other hand it<lb/>
divests all Judges of the<lb/>
so much greater power<lb/>
the compleatly legislative<lb/>
so commonly exercises<lb/>
by Judges, during the shape<lb/>
or by the connivance of<lb/>
the Legislature, on pretence<lb/>
of interpretation<lb/>
The reason of giving to<lb/>
Judges this initiative are<lb/>
1. that under their notes<lb/>
will continually be any<lb/>
cases which though they<lb/>
hav just so <gap/> the<lb/>
demand they present<lb/>
for legislation would<lb/>
not be equally apt to<lb/>
come under the cognizance<lb/>
of the member<lb/>
of the Legislation<lb/>
2. thus for want of<lb/>
having their attention <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> and <gap/><lb/>
<gap/>on the part of the Law.</note><lb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 16:01, 21 February 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824. July 11

Constitutional Code. Ch.XII Judiciary collectively
S.18. Preinterpretative function

By the applicant, if he thinks fit, may the terms of the amendmant
be proposed: in this case the Judge employs either those
same words, or others at his choice: he is alike responsible
for them in either case

8
Art.8 Rather to reform
particular over made in legislation
than to introduce
in this mode
ext alteration is
the object of the pa
thus conferred.
Not more matter than
would occupy [one
fault] part of a page
in the official edition of the
Code in question will
any such proposed amendment
consort
or experage.

Any part of the law may give rise to the exercises of
this function on the part of the Judge whether spontaneousily
or obtainperatively exercised. But if it be the Constitutional
the J without reference either to the penal ot the nonpenal
called Civil branch he will rather receive and it be an applicant
to apply to some Member of the Legislature for the purpose
rather than himself takes cognizance of it.

9
Art.9 Of the creature
of this person, the
is to give to every Judge
and ive, and ever
more an
as to every part of the field
of law.
But on the other hand it
divests all Judges of the
so much greater power
the compleatly legislative
so commonly exercises
by Judges, during the shape
or by the connivance of
the Legislature, on pretence
of interpretation
The reason of giving to
Judges this initiative are
1. that under their notes
will continually be any
cases which though they
hav just so the
demand they present
for legislation would
not be equally apt to
come under the cognizance
of the member
of the Legislation
2. thus for want of
having their attention
and
on the part of the Law.



Identifier: | JB/042/444/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1824-07-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

8-10

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

444

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13367

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in