JB/042/466/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/042/466/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1824. July 17 +<lb/>Constitutional Code</head> <!-- marginal summaries in pencil --> <p><note>IV<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> XII Judiciary collectively</note><lb/>12 <note>&sect;.16. <sic>Sistitive</sic><lb/>&sect;. 17 Emendatory<lb/>&sect;. 18 <sic>Preinterpretative</sic><lb/><sic>Preinterpretation</sic></note></p> <p><note>29<lb/><sic>Art.</sic> 29. Thus of the<lb/>two modes of evil produced<lb/>by deficiency in<lb/>form, namely want<lb/>of exception and want<lb/>of exemplification, only<lb/>for the later can <sic>preinterpretation</sic> <add><del>by</del></add> <del>by <gap/></del> <add>supplying</add><lb/><del>remedy</del> the deficiency<lb/>be an apt remedy.</note></p> <p>This being presumed, <del>the want of</del> deficiency in respect of exemplification<lb/>will be seen to be <del>that</del> <add>and the rule in</add> one of the two <sic>submodes</sic> for<lb/>the removal of which preinterpretation will be the <add>an apt</add> appropriate<lb/>remedy.  Being at the same time a relative imperfection, relation being<lb/>had to the mind of the reader as well as to that of the author it will<lb/>very frequently <add>not infrequently</add> be matter of <add>sincere</add> doubt to <del>w</del> the amount of which if<lb/>the two the imperfection ought to be placed: a designation which is particular<lb/>enough for an individual may not be so for another.  To the<lb/>number of possible <add>specific</add> exemplifications there are no limits for <del>the <gap/></del><lb/><gap/> under each species the number of exemplification <gap/><lb/>being given without departure from truth is the same as that of the<lb/>actually existing <del>added to that of the</del> individuals actually <gap/><lb/>under <add>within</add> it added to those which may be imagined to be contained<lb/>under it.  Carry to a certain length the process of exemplification<lb/>the mass of the law makes under its own weight. <add><del>to those</del> also</add> <del>by the birth of the<lb/>whole together</del> to those <gap/>  affected by <del>this or that</del> <add>such and such</add> particular<lb/>those same part are by the birth of the whole rendered <gap/></p> <p><note>31<lb/><sic>Art.</sic> 31. To the possible<lb/>number of <add>apt</add> <hi rend="underline">specific</hi> exemplifications<lb?>there can<lb/>be no limit: some under<lb/>each species, as designated<lb/>by a specific<lb/>appellation are contained<lb/>not only all actual<lb/>individuals contained in<lb/>it but all possible ones.<lb/>Thence by the <gap/><lb/>of an exemplificative<lb/>proposition, no inference<lb/>is necessarily deducible<lb/>to the prejudice of the<lb/>legislature applied.</note></p> <p>Accordingly, by the <del>skill of</del> skill of the Judge, called into action<lb/>by the <del>interest in</del> produce of a party interested relief may be<lb/>afforded to the individual &#x2014; improvement and in the tenor <add>nature</add> of the law &#x2014;<lb/>without any the slightest scratch <add>wound</add> to the self <gap/> of the Legislator.<lb/>Not so in the case where <del>b</del> it is by the want of <del>the</del><lb/>some exception requisite that <add>of</add> the <del>risk</del> <add>evil with which the</add> law is <gap/>, <del>all</del><lb/>it will if carried into execution by the Judge be productive.</p> <p><note>32<lb/><sic>Art.</sic> 32.  Not so in the case of the<Lb/>omission of a requisite<lb/>exception.</note></p> <p> Penal law (suppose) against<lb/>corporal vexation in all<lb/>its shapes: exception necessary,<lb/>those requisite<lb/>for establishing the <gap/><lb/>of the Judge, the the Private<lb/>Service Minister, the <gap/><lb/>and authorizing the service<lb/>of the individual practitioners</note></p> <p>So, in case of a contract<lb/>if a man were subjected<lb/><!-- continues along the left hand edge of the page --> [+] to the <sic>burthen</sic> of compensation, for omitting to Judge an <del><gap/></del> <add>agreement to rob</add> a third person.</note></p> <p>If for example <del>for want</del> <add>by omission</add> of <gap/> of the appropriate causes of justification<lb/>or exemption the description <add>designation</add>given of a criminal act<lb/>should be left too large and comprehensive: if in case of corporal<lb/>vexation for example, the punishment that should have been confined to<lb/>evil doers should <del>have</del> be <add>left</add> appointed to fall upon the minister of<lb/>justice, the parent, the guardian, the individual practitioner or the<lb/><gap/>.  So in non penal law if in a case of a contract, <add>for want of an appropriate exception</add> one of<lb/>the parties were subjected to the <sic>burthen</sic> of compensation, for non performance<lb/>of an engagement <del>the <gap/></del> <add>if</add> the performance of which <gap/> injury to those<lb/parties would have been the result.</p> 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 12:10, 27 February 2023

Click Here To Edit

1824. July 17 +
Constitutional Code

IV
Ch. XII Judiciary collectively

12 §.16. Sistitive
§. 17 Emendatory
§. 18 Preinterpretative
Preinterpretation

29
Art. 29. Thus of the
two modes of evil produced
by deficiency in
form, namely want
of exception and want
of exemplification, only
for the later can preinterpretation by by supplying
remedy the deficiency
be an apt remedy.

This being presumed, the want of deficiency in respect of exemplification
will be seen to be that and the rule in one of the two submodes for
the removal of which preinterpretation will be the an apt appropriate
remedy. Being at the same time a relative imperfection, relation being
had to the mind of the reader as well as to that of the author it will
very frequently not infrequently be matter of sincere doubt to w the amount of which if
the two the imperfection ought to be placed: a designation which is particular
enough for an individual may not be so for another. To the
number of possible specific exemplifications there are no limits for the
under each species the number of exemplification
being given without departure from truth is the same as that of the
actually existing added to that of the individuals actually
under within it added to those which may be imagined to be contained
under it. Carry to a certain length the process of exemplification
the mass of the law makes under its own weight. to those also by the birth of the
whole together
to those affected by this or that such and such particular
those same part are by the birth of the whole rendered

31
Art. 31. To the possible
number of apt specific exemplifications<lb?>there can
be no limit: some under
each species, as designated
by a specific
appellation are contained
not only all actual
individuals contained in
it but all possible ones.
Thence by the
of an exemplificative
proposition, no inference
is necessarily deducible
to the prejudice of the
legislature applied.

Accordingly, by the skill of skill of the Judge, called into action
by the interest in produce of a party interested relief may be
afforded to the individual — improvement and in the tenor nature of the law —
without any the slightest scratch wound to the self of the Legislator.
Not so in the case where b it is by the want of the
some exception requisite that of the risk evil with which the law is , all
it will if carried into execution by the Judge be productive.

32
Art. 32. Not so in the case of the
omission of a requisite
exception.

Penal law (suppose) against
corporal vexation in all
its shapes: exception necessary,
those requisite
for establishing the
of the Judge, the the Private
Service Minister, the
and authorizing the service
of the individual practitioners</note>

So, in case of a contract
if a man were subjected
[+] to the burthen of compensation, for omitting to Judge an agreement to rob a third person.</note>

If for example for want by omission of of the appropriate causes of justification
or exemption the description designationgiven of a criminal act
should be left too large and comprehensive: if in case of corporal
vexation for example, the punishment that should have been confined to
evil doers should have be left appointed to fall upon the minister of
justice, the parent, the guardian, the individual practitioner or the
. So in non penal law if in a case of a contract, for want of an appropriate exception one of
the parties were subjected to the burthen of compensation, for non performance
of an engagement the if the performance of which injury to those<lb/parties would have been the result.




Identifier: | JB/042/466/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1824-07-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

29-31

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

466

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13389

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in