★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
1824 Decr. 26 1825 Decr. 18 + | |||
Constitutional Code | |||
IV | |||
Ch. XXVII Local Registrars | |||
§. Purposes | |||
§.7. Post obit administration function | |||
Instructions | |||
Uses. | |||
Instructions | |||
§.7. Post obit administration granting function | |||
Instructions | |||
1 | |||
Art. 1. On post obit | |||
administration granting | |||
function | |||
Withholden here is the | |||
imperative function: <gap/> <gap/> | |||
sole one given, <gap/> | |||
advice-giving say | |||
operative | |||
In the case of the post obit administration function, | |||
considering were this case considered by itself, the advantage, | |||
which, in respect of delay vexation and expence, would accrue | |||
from the <gap/> determining between conflicting clauses, as the the | |||
title to the this trust, is obvious. But by the departing departure | |||
that in this case would which would thus be made from the one principle of | |||
omni competence, and the additional stage of jurisdiction | |||
which with reference to the business <gap/> field of this function, a degree | |||
of complication would be have been introduced the <gap/> evil effect | |||
of which would, it was thought, outweigh the benefit. | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1824 Decr. 26 1825 Decr. 18 + Constitutional Code
IV Ch. XXVII Local Registrars §. Purposes §.7. Post obit administration function Instructions Uses.
Instructions
§.7. Post obit administration granting function
Instructions
1 Art. 1. On post obit administration granting function
Withholden here is the imperative function: sole one given, advice-giving say operative
In the case of the post obit administration function, considering were this case considered by itself, the advantage, which, in respect of delay vexation and expence, would accrue from the determining between conflicting clauses, as the the title to the this trust, is obvious. But by the departing departure that in this case would which would thus be made from the one principle of omni competence, and the additional stage of jurisdiction which with reference to the business field of this function, a degree of complication would be have been introduced the evil effect of which would, it was thought, outweigh the benefit.
Identifier: | JB/042/798/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1824-12-26 |
1-2, 1a |
||
042 |
constitutional code |
||
798 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
instructions / post obit administration granting function / instructions |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
|||
jeremy bentham |
|||
13721 |
|||