★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/047/027/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/047/027/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>2 Apr 1806</head><lb/> | |||
<head>EVID. Exclusion</head><lb/> | |||
Deception <gap/> ground<lb/> | |||
I When th Exclusion<lb/> | |||
is grounded in fear of<lb/> | |||
deception the <unclear>admission</unclear><lb/> | |||
of accomplices <gap/><lb/> | |||
affords conclusion proof<lb/> | |||
of the impropriety of<lb/> | |||
it-for<lb/> | |||
1 as a proof by experience<lb/> | |||
for-<lb/> | |||
1 Temptation is at its<lb/> | |||
maximum<lb/> | |||
2 So improbity yet<lb/> | |||
material mendacity<lb/> | |||
not preponderantly<lb/> | |||
frequent deception<lb/> | |||
extremely rare. <unclear>h.1</unclear><lb/> | |||
1<lb/> | |||
Conviction has taken &<lb/> | |||
may take place on this<lb/> | |||
evidence <unclear>singly</unclear><lb/> | |||
2<lb/> | |||
2- as an argumentation<lb/> | |||
ad hominem<lb/> | |||
With what consistency<lb/> | |||
can evidence under less<lb/> | |||
temptation, & when then<lb/> | |||
is no proof of actual<lb/> | |||
improbity, &when <gap/><lb/> | |||
can of deception th<lb/> | |||
mischief and be inferior<lb/> | |||
be excluded<!-- unidentifiable symbol --><lb/> | |||
3<lb/> | |||
<unclear>Apt</unclear> on th single ground<lb/> | |||
of temptation, tho' but no-<lb/> | |||
-minal, or of improbity<lb/> | |||
without temptation, &<lb/> | |||
tho' th mischief be next<lb/> | |||
to nothing evidence is<lb/><lb/> | |||
in a thousand cases ex-<lb/> | |||
-cluded on this score. h.2<lb/> | |||
2. Vexation <gap/> ground.<lb/> | |||
II When Vexation has<lb/> | |||
<unclear>afforded</unclear> the ground, th<lb/> | |||
vexation has been either<lb/> | |||
ideal or more than<lb/> | |||
counterbalanced. h.3<lb/> | |||
5<lb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
Click Here To Edit
2 Apr 1806
EVID. Exclusion
Deception ground
I When th Exclusion
is grounded in fear of
deception the admission
of accomplices
affords conclusion proof
of the impropriety of
it-for
1 as a proof by experience
for-
1 Temptation is at its
maximum
2 So improbity yet
material mendacity
not preponderantly
frequent deception
extremely rare. h.1
1
Conviction has taken &
may take place on this
evidence singly
2
2- as an argumentation
ad hominem
With what consistency
can evidence under less
temptation, & when then
is no proof of actual
improbity, &when
can of deception th
mischief and be inferior
be excluded
3
Apt on th single ground
of temptation, tho' but no-
-minal, or of improbity
without temptation, &
tho' th mischief be next
to nothing evidence is
in a thousand cases ex-
-cluded on this score. h.2
2. Vexation ground.
II When Vexation has
afforded the ground, th
vexation has been either
ideal or more than
counterbalanced. h.3
5
|
Identifier: | JB/047/027/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1806-04-02 |
1, 1a, 2-7, 1-3, 1 |
||
|
047 |
evidence |
||
|
027 |
evid. exclusion b. i introduction ch. 3 short proof |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d2 |
||
|
john herbert koe |
|||
|
14895 |
|||
