JB/047/116/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/047/116/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lauraterry (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>What is to <unclear>become</unclear> with delinquents after they<lb/>
are thus mutilated. If they are to be supported<lb/>
at the <del>expence of </del> public cost, the punishment<lb/>
becomes <del><gap/></del> too expensive: if <del>they are</del> left to<lb/>
themselves, they are condemned to perpetual<lb/>
misery or death. Mutilation <del><gap/></del> used as a <lb/>
punishment has two inconveniences 1. it is<lb/>
irreversible. 2. it is <unclear><gap/></unclear>v to be <del>confounded with</del> <add>ascribed</add> to<lb/>
accidents arising from natural causes. <del>There is</del><lb/>
Between a man who has <del>had his arm cut</del><lb/>
been deprived of his arm as a punishment<lb/>
for a crime, and he who has lost his arm<lb/>
in the service of <del>this</del> his country, there is<lb/>
no apparent difference. It would be necessary<lb/>
therefore in all cases to add a stigma that<lb/>
should be manifestly <del><gap/></del> artificial, to <lb/>
serve as a certificate of the crime, and as a<lb/>
protection to misfortune. <unclear>There</unclear> appears <unclear>dearth</unclear><lb/>
to <unclear>support</unclear> that these punishments might<lb/>
altogether <unclear><gap/></unclear>: at least they should be<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> reserved for offences that very rarely<lb/>
happen, and when they may be recommended <lb/>
by their analogy.<lb/></p>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 12:55, 16 September 2022

Click Here To Edit

What is to become with delinquents after they
are thus mutilated. If they are to be supported
at the expence of public cost, the punishment
becomes too expensive: if they are left to
themselves, they are condemned to perpetual
misery or death. Mutilation used as a
punishment has two inconveniences 1. it is
irreversible. 2. it is v to be confounded with ascribed to
accidents arising from natural causes. There is
Between a man who has had his arm cut
been deprived of his arm as a punishment
for a crime, and he who has lost his arm
in the service of this his country, there is
no apparent difference. It would be necessary
therefore in all cases to add a stigma that
should be manifestly artificial, to
serve as a certificate of the crime, and as a
protection to misfortune. There appears dearth
to support that these punishments might
altogether : at least they should be
reserved for offences that very rarely
happen, and when they may be recommended
by their analogy.




Identifier: | JB/047/116/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 47.

Date_1

1806-08-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-7

Box

047

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

116

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

14984

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in