JB/051/211/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/211/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/211/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/211/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head><!-- in pencil -->1</head>
 
<head><!-- in pencil -->Tit. V. B. 11.</head>
 
<p><note><!-- in pencil -->High Court</note> Another feature of difference between my plan<lb/>
and that of the Committee is the mode of<lb/>
placing the ultimate <sic>controul</sic> over the Courts<lb/>
of Justice. I give it without hesitation to <add>or rather keep it in</add> the<lb/>
National Assembly itself. The Committee hope<lb/>
to get rid of it, and in that <gap/> they announce<lb/>
a High National Court of Justice in which<lb/>
they mean to place it. The composition of this<lb/>
High Court at the time I am writing has not been<lb/>
yet delineated. I do not want to see the composition<lb/>
of it in order to form my judgment of it.<lb/>
It is sufficient to me to know that it is not<lb/>
the National Assembly. Judging from analogy<lb/>
I conclude that this stratum <add>stop</add> in the pyramid<lb/>
reversed is to be the broadest and most numerous<lb/>
of all. The Committee thinking they see<lb/>
Numbers being with them the measure of wisdom<lb/>
and probity and every thing that is desirable in<lb/>
a Court of Justice, they will not be wanting in<lb/>
<del>info</del> any expedient application remedy that<lb/>
<add>promises to</add> can infuse a due portion of those qualities into<lb/>
a Court which is to set the law to all the rest.</p>
 
<p>This highest of all the spheres this last stronghold <add>of</add></p>
 





Revision as of 23:16, 30 August 2012

Click Here To Edit

1

Tit. V. B. 11.

High Court Another feature of difference between my plan
and that of the Committee is the mode of
placing the ultimate controul over the Courts
of Justice. I give it without hesitation to or rather keep it in the
National Assembly itself. The Committee hope
to get rid of it, and in that they announce
a High National Court of Justice in which
they mean to place it. The composition of this
High Court at the time I am writing has not been
yet delineated. I do not want to see the composition
of it in order to form my judgment of it.
It is sufficient to me to know that it is not
the National Assembly. Judging from analogy
I conclude that this stratum stop in the pyramid
reversed is to be the broadest and most numerous
of all. The Committee thinking they see
Numbers being with them the measure of wisdom
and probity and every thing that is desirable in
a Court of Justice, they will not be wanting in
info any expedient application remedy that
promises to can infuse a due portion of those qualities into
a Court which is to set the law to all the rest.

This highest of all the spheres this last stronghold of




Identifier: | JB/051/211/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

211

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 f57 / d2 f58 / d3 f59 / d4 f60

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16376

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in