JB/052/156/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/156/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1827 <sic>Aug.</sic> 5<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>6<lb/><note>Preface</note><lb/>6</p> <p><note>12<lb/>Thus every clerk<lb/>copying the indictment<lb/>has the power of pardon.</note></p> <p>This it is that by the deliberating and so recently declared<lb/><del><gap/></del> judgment their judgment unanimous<b/>of the 12 Wise men of the West <add>those irresistible arbiters of <gap/> destiny</add> it is <del><gap/></del> conclusively established<lb/>that, not to speak of other <add>so many</add> functionaries of the<lb/>law the power of granting effectual pardons to all criminals<lb>murderers or <gap/> not excepted, belays<lb/><gap/> to every person to <add>by</add> whom down to the issuing<lb/of it the function of drawing <add>penning</add> the instrument of accusation is<lb/>performed. </p> <p><note>13<lb>Thus every criminal<lb/>should bribe the draughtsman</note></p> <p>With this licence <del>the</del> <gap/> to himself is every murderer<lb/>who <del>had</del> by his murder is <gap/> having provided himself<lb/>with the <del><gap/></del> money omitted to offer to the penner <add>draughtman</add><lb/><del>the sum</del.>whatsoever sum may be requisite to the insertion<lb/>of the money-administering surplusage: wanting to himself<lb/>disrespectful to the <add><gap/> of the law</add> 12 Judges is the draughtsman by<lb/>whom so advantageous on offer is refused.  what<lb/>danger for him can there be from the acceptance of it?<lb/>So many of these omissions as there had been in times past<lb><del><gap/></del. none of them producing any suspicion of <gap/>design<lb/>so easy so frequent such omissions without <gap/> design<lb/>who <gap/> <el>pardon</del> <add>be <gap/> charge</add> <gap/> <gap/> in the <add>any</add> future<lb/>instance whatever it be.</p> <p><note>14<lb/>Benefit of this <gap/><lb/>money in Judge &amp; <sic>Cos</sic><lb/>Pockets</note></p> <p><gap/> By the functionaries in question true it is that<lb/>by the <add>in consequence<add> of the omission a good sum of money &#x2014; say a thousand<lb/>pounds has been received.  True?  But from then doe sit follow<lb/>that it was really his <gap/> that <gap/> should escape?<lb>Forbid it <gap/>! forbid it justice!  <del>To be <gap/> a <gap/></del> <add> <gap/></add><lb/>The Judges are they not ministers of justice?  This draughtsman<lb/>is he not a Minister of justice likewise?</p>
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 11:18, 25 October 2021

Click Here To Edit

1827 Aug. 5
Procedure Code

6
Preface
6

12
Thus every clerk
copying the indictment
has the power of pardon.

This it is that by the deliberating and so recently declared
judgment their judgment unanimousof the 12 Wise men of the West those irresistible arbiters of destiny it is conclusively established
that, not to speak of other so many functionaries of the
law the power of granting effectual pardons to all criminals<lb>murderers or not excepted, belays
to every person to by whom down to the issuing<lb/of it the function of drawing penning the instrument of accusation is
performed.

13<lb>Thus every criminal
should bribe the draughtsman

With this licence the to himself is every murderer
who had by his murder is having provided himself
with the money omitted to offer to the penner draughtman
the sum</del.>whatsoever sum may be requisite to the insertion
of the money-administering surplusage: wanting to himself
disrespectful to the of the law 12 Judges is the draughtsman by
whom so advantageous on offer is refused. what
danger for him can there be from the acceptance of it?
So many of these omissions as there had been in times past<lb></del. none of them producing any suspicion of design
so easy so frequent such omissions without design
who <el>pardon
be charge in the any future
instance whatever it be.

14
Benefit of this
money in Judge & Cos
Pockets

By the functionaries in question true it is that
by the in consequence<add> of the omission a good sum of money — say a thousand
pounds has been received. True? But from then doe sit follow
that it was really his that should escape?<lb>Forbid it ! forbid it justice! To be a <add>

The Judges are they not ministers of justice? This draughtsman
is he not a Minister of justice likewise?



Identifier: | JB/052/156/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1827-08-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

12-14

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

156

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1826

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1826

Notes public

ID Number

16829

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in