★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/225/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/051/225/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | |||
21-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend. | |||
<head>4</head><!-- aligned to the left-hand margin, and in pencil --> | |||
<p><!-- indented --><note>Accommodation Appeal <unclear>retrograde</unclear><!-- having checked the other folios in this series I'm pretty certain it's this, or 'retrograd-', though I think, the former. --></note><!-- note in pencil --> Why try new establishments when the tried ones | |||
<lb/> | |||
promise so much better? What have the Committee | |||
<lb/> | |||
to say against the <gap/> jurisdiction . | |||
<lb/> | |||
I have looked at it , and from all I | |||
<lb/> | |||
can find concerning it , it sums<!-- though could be 'seems' --> perfection itself | |||
<lb/> | |||
in comparison of <del>any</del> all the systems that | |||
<lb/> | |||
surround and cramp it . It has too many | |||
<lb/> | |||
Judges by all that are above one : it were easy | |||
<lb/> | |||
to strike off all that are above one . It has no | |||
<lb/> | |||
appeals above it : it were easy to give it appeals . | |||
<lb/> | |||
It has not <add>so much</add> publicity <del><unclear>once</unclear></del> as were to be wished : | |||
<lb/> | |||
it were easy to give it more . It is in good <gap/> , | |||
<lb/> | |||
I conceive <add>it should seem</add> with the public : for the Committee, | |||
<lb/> | |||
though not ill-disposed to abrogation <del>will not</del> <add>do not</add> | |||
<lb/> | |||
<del>venture</del> <add>choose</add> to abrogate it . I <hi rend='underline'>wil</hi>l venture — why? | |||
<lb/></p> | |||
21-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.
4
Accommodation Appeal retrograde Why try new establishments when the tried ones
promise so much better? What have the Committee
to say against the jurisdiction .
I have looked at it , and from all I
can find concerning it , it sums perfection itself
in comparison of any all the systems that
surround and cramp it . It has too many
Judges by all that are above one : it were easy
to strike off all that are above one . It has no
appeals above it : it were easy to give it appeals .
It has not so much publicity once as were to be wished :
it were easy to give it more . It is in good ,
I conceive it should seem with the public : for the Committee,
though not ill-disposed to abrogation will not do not
venture choose to abrogate it . I will venture — why?
|
Identifier: | JB/051/225/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
051 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
|
225 |
|||
|
004 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
d1 / d2 / d3 / d4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
arthur young |
|||
|
16390 |
|||
