JB/052/497/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/497/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1824. <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</sic> 5<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><note>2<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Means of execution</note><lb/>(4) <note>&sect;. 3 Occasion of need &amp; fit</note></p> <p>At the commencement of the <Add>a</add> suit natural <sic>forthcomingness</sic><lb/>is necessary for one purpose, eventual forthomingess <del>simply<lb/>fo</del> <gap/> intent sincerity for it at another</p> <p>In so far as <del>th</del> the point of the individual in question<lb/><gap/> whether for testification or for any other purpose, <add>testification for the purpose of the <gap/> is necessary</add>, <add>the/<gap/></add> <sic>forthcomingness</sic><lb/>is necessary as actual <sic>forthcomingness</sic>: <del>where</del> in so far as such<lb/>testification is not/ necessary, actual <sic>forthcomingness</sic> may be<lb/>not necessary; eventual <sic>forthcoimngness</sic> may be<lb/>not necessary; eventual <sic>forthcomingness</sic> and thence actual <add>present</add> security<lb/>for eventual <sic>forthcomingness</sic> may be sufficient.</p> <p>For this obtaining and securing compliance respecting<lb/><sic>forthcomingness</sic> the means employable are either <add>such as</add> physical<lb/><del>operating</del> <Add>operate</add> on the body or such as operate only in the mind<lb/>In the first case they may be stated <sic>prehensive,</sic> in the other case<lb/>the person in question to be served <add><gap/> should a</add> whosoever he is, and as<lb?>a thing <gap/> might be, brought <del>before</del> <add>to</add> the place at which<lb/>the operation which <add>whatever it be</add> it is decreed to perform on him <gap/><lb/>or may be performed: in the case here in question that of<lb/>causing him to speak <add>in oration</add> on the subject in question the proposed<lb/>subject of discourse</p> <p>Physical <add>Prehension</add> is always the most vexatious.  Therefore<lb/>physical ought never to be employed but under the expectation<lb/>that <gap/> will not suffice</p> <p>To things prehension are <add>is</add> the only one of the<lb/>two means which the nature of the case <sic>admitts</sic> of.  But<lb/>the prehension may be performed <gap/> by the person in whose<lb/>custody they are or by the functionary by whom if performed<lb?>upon him the prehension would be performed</p> <p>Where things alone are the intended object of prehension<lb/>the proper <add>appropriate</add> instrument is therefore an instrument of accretion <add>unless <del>rate</del> effective reluctance be apprehended</add><lb/>addressed to the person coupled with an instrument of <gap/><lb/>requiring him to <sic>prehend</sic> and <gap/> the thing.</p>
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 17:47, 8 January 2022

Click Here To Edit

1824. Decr. 5
Procedure Code

2o
Ch. Means of execution

(4) §. 3 Occasion of need & fit

At the commencement of the a suit natural forthcomingness
is necessary for one purpose, eventual forthomingess simply
fo
intent sincerity for it at another

In so far as th the point of the individual in question
whether for testification or for any other purpose, testification for the purpose of the is necessary, the/ forthcomingness
is necessary as actual forthcomingness: where in so far as such
testification is not/ necessary, actual forthcomingness may be
not necessary; eventual forthcoimngness may be
not necessary; eventual forthcomingness and thence actual present security
for eventual forthcomingness may be sufficient.

For this obtaining and securing compliance respecting
forthcomingness the means employable are either such as physical
operating operate on the body or such as operate only in the mind
In the first case they may be stated prehensive, in the other case
the person in question to be served should a whosoever he is, and as<lb?>a thing might be, brought before to the place at which
the operation which whatever it be it is decreed to perform on him
or may be performed: in the case here in question that of
causing him to speak in oration on the subject in question the proposed
subject of discourse

Physical Prehension is always the most vexatious. Therefore
physical ought never to be employed but under the expectation
that will not suffice

To things prehension are is the only one of the
two means which the nature of the case admitts of. But
the prehension may be performed by the person in whose
custody they are or by the functionary by whom if performed<lb?>upon him the prehension would be performed

Where things alone are the intended object of prehension
the proper appropriate instrument is therefore an instrument of accretion unless rate effective reluctance be apprehended
addressed to the person coupled with an instrument of
requiring him to prehend and the thing.



Identifier: | JB/052/497/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1824-12-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

497

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17170

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in