★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/229/005|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/051/229/005|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <head><!-- in pencil -->Judges Number</head> | ||
<p><note><!-- in pencil -->19 Plurality is only of use in as far as it induces a degree no chance of publicity</note> Spite of all these reasons, cogent as they feel to<lb/> | |||
me, I should not be surprized were I to find <add>symptoms</add> an<lb/> | |||
notions of the necessity of a multiplicity of Judges<lb/> | |||
attachment to the system of multiplicity still<lb/> | |||
lurking in men's minds. Why? Because under<lb/> | |||
the <add>dark</add> regimen of darkness the <add>the</add> multiplicity of the<lb/> | |||
Judges produced a sort of faint light, a sort<lb/> | |||
of <add>commencement of</add> imperfect publicity. Suppose but two, each<lb/> | |||
though withdrawn <add>concealed</add> from the <sic>controuling</sic> <add>superintending</add> eye of<lb/> | |||
the public is subject to the <sic>controul</sic> of <del>the</del> <add>his</add> colleague.<lb/> | |||
Should they both be iniquitous it is<lb/> | |||
not natural they should always agree in iniquity.<lb/> | |||
<add>The</add> Confederacy <del>between kna</del> of the wicked<lb/> | |||
carries with it <add>bears in its bosom</add> the seeds of disagreement: disagreement<lb/> | |||
produces mutual <del>reproaches</del> <add>murmurs</add> and appeals<lb/> | |||
to the world at large. But in this case<lb/> | |||
on what score <add>account</add> is multiplicity of any use? Only<lb/> | |||
on account of its tendency to <add>connection with</add> publicity <add>in proportion to</add> and its<lb/> | |||
tendency to be productive of that effect. In every<lb/> | |||
other point of view we have found it either<lb/> | |||
useless or pernicious. The consequence is that it<lb/> | |||
is to <add>upon</add> publicity that we should trust <add>build</add> for our<lb/> | |||
security, and discard the other expedient altogether.</p> | |||
Judges Number
19 Plurality is only of use in as far as it induces a degree no chance of publicity Spite of all these reasons, cogent as they feel to
me, I should not be surprized were I to find symptoms an
notions of the necessity of a multiplicity of Judges
attachment to the system of multiplicity still
lurking in men's minds. Why? Because under
the dark regimen of darkness the the multiplicity of the
Judges produced a sort of faint light, a sort
of commencement of imperfect publicity. Suppose but two, each
though withdrawn concealed from the controuling superintending eye of
the public is subject to the controul of the his colleague.
Should they both be iniquitous it is
not natural they should always agree in iniquity.
The Confederacy between kna of the wicked
carries with it bears in its bosom the seeds of disagreement: disagreement
produces mutual reproaches murmurs and appeals
to the world at large. But in this case
on what score account is multiplicity of any use? Only
on account of its tendency to connection with publicity in proportion to and its
tendency to be productive of that effect. In every
other point of view we have found it either
useless or pernicious. The consequence is that it
is to upon publicity that we should trust build for our
security, and discard the other expedient altogether.
Identifier: | JB/051/229/005"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
051 |
evidence; procedure code |
||
229a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 229. |
|||
005 |
note? |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
a1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
l munn |
||
benjamin constant |
|||
16394 |
|||