JB/054/153/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/054/153/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/153/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/054/153/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825. <del>March</del> April<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure Code</head></p>
 
<p>Add – Lawyers can not consistently<lb/>
 
object to this</p>
 
<p><del>To secure</del> <add>Against</add> responsibility in case of insufficiency<lb/>
or importance, <del>it seems</del> a proper security seems to be<lb/>
obligation <del>for</del> on the respondent to say <del><gap/></del> in his response<lb/>
whether it was drawn up without or with assistance<lb/>
and if with, with <unclear>whose</unclear> assistance, mentioning whether<lb/>
<del>J</del> gratuitous or professional.</p>
<p>In the <add>proposed</add> Constitutional Code with which this<lb/>
proposed Procedure Code is connected, under the<lb/>
names of Local Headmen and Local Headmens'<lb/>
Registrars two sorts of functionary are provided,<lb/>
to act together in each of those <gap/> of territory, reformed<lb/>
by the last act of division applied to the whole<lb/>
territory of the State.  See Constitut. Code Ch. XXVIII<lb/>
Local Headmen.  In the <del><gap/></del> Local Headmen<lb/>
an individual in any such helpless state as that<lb/>
above indicated, would find a ready prepared<lb/>
assistant and comforter.  In England no such functionary:<lb/>
in England therefore no such <unclear>resource</unclear>.</p>
<p><add>In this proposed last</add> Against falshood in <del>an</del> epistolary testimony, these<lb/>
securities are, <add>as above,</add> provided, no one of which is provided in the<lb/>
English mode – 1. <del>first</del> in all <add>every</add> <del>judicatory</del> judicial <add>juridical</add> occasion<lb/>
in every one the same as <add>are</add> in every other, responsibility<lb/>
compensational or <gap/>, one or both, according as<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> the case may require:  2. <del>assurance</del> <add>after examination in the epistolary</add> in case of<lb/>
need, <del>so</del> subsidiary examination performed on the same<lb/>
individual, <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></add> on the open mode:  in case of falsehood<lb/>
mendacious or temerarious uttered in the oral form, and evidence<lb/>
sufficient for the establishment of conviction and punishment at the<lb/>
moment and <del>at</del> on the<lb/>
spot, without <del><gap/></del> need<lb/>
of adjournment to a distant<lb/>
day for a separate hearing.  <del>In Judicial</del><lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> securities not one has place in English practice.  From this imperfection which in the epistolary mode as compared with the oral might be found<lb/>
or supposed to have place in English practice<lb/>
in relation to this matter as at present conducted,<lb/>
altogether ungrounded would be any<lb/>
inferences by which any such imperfections<lb/>
were <del><gap/></del> concluded to be ascribable to the<lb/>
epistolary mode as here proposed to be conducted.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 05:33, 20 August 2022

Click Here To Edit

1825. March April
Procedure Code

Add – Lawyers can not consistently
object to this

To secure Against responsibility in case of insufficiency
or importance, it seems a proper security seems to be
obligation for on the respondent to say in his response
whether it was drawn up without or with assistance
and if with, with whose assistance, mentioning whether
J gratuitous or professional.

In the proposed Constitutional Code with which this
proposed Procedure Code is connected, under the
names of Local Headmen and Local Headmens'
Registrars two sorts of functionary are provided,
to act together in each of those of territory, reformed
by the last act of division applied to the whole
territory of the State. See Constitut. Code Ch. XXVIII
Local Headmen. In the Local Headmen
an individual in any such helpless state as that
above indicated, would find a ready prepared
assistant and comforter. In England no such functionary:
in England therefore no such resource.

In this proposed last Against falshood in an epistolary testimony, these
securities are, as above, provided, no one of which is provided in the
English mode – 1. first in all every judicatory judicial juridical occasion
in every one the same as are in every other, responsibility
compensational or , one or both, according as
the case may require: 2. assurance after examination in the epistolary in case of
need, so subsidiary examination performed on the same
individual, do on the open mode: in case of falsehood
mendacious or temerarious uttered in the oral form, and evidence
sufficient for the establishment of conviction and punishment at the
moment and at on the
spot, without need
of adjournment to a distant
day for a separate hearing. In Judicial
securities not one has place in English practice. From this imperfection which in the epistolary mode as compared with the oral might be found
or supposed to have place in English practice
in relation to this matter as at present conducted,
altogether ungrounded would be any
inferences by which any such imperfections
were concluded to be ascribable to the
epistolary mode as here proposed to be conducted.


Identifier: | JB/054/153/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54.

Date_1

1825-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

8-9

Box

054

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

153

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17672

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in