★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/394/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/058/394/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><del>The</del> A rule <add>principle</add> of natural justice the most obvious perhaps and most irrefragable<lb/> | |||
of any that ever presented themselves to human reason could<lb/> | |||
not be battered in breach: it was necessary to undermine it.</p> | |||
<p><hi rend="underline"><foreign>Andi alteram partem</foreign></hi> is an adage, among the most frequent in<lb/> | |||
use, as well as among the earliest in date. By another maxim<lb/> | |||
somewhat more extended, the iniquity of the Judge who should presume<lb/> | |||
to violate the <unclear>former</unclear> is denounced to the tribunal of mankind. <foreign>Qui<lb/> | |||
statuerit parte inaudlta altera, aequum llce’t statuerit, non æquum<lb/> | |||
facit. Andi alteram partem</foreign> – the injustice, the single injustice<lb/> | |||
comprized in the violation of that rule, was the utmost <add>most flagrant</add> that in that<lb/> | |||
early stage of human existence <add>improvement and human corruption</add> had presented itself to the imagination<lb/> | |||
of mankind. By the stroke, the master stroke here in question, <add>before us,</add><lb/> | |||
that injustice was doubted. To | |||
</p> | |||
<p><!-- pencil -->13 June 1805<lb/> | |||
<head>Evidence</head></p> | |||
<p>§. Excluding principals <del>– <gap/> admitting</del> <add>which none but</add> hired proxies <add>were admitted</add></p> | |||
<p>These two arrangements are in effect but counterparts of one and<lb/> | |||
the same arrangement. Excluding principals without admitting proxies<lb/> | |||
would not have executed the design but marred it: it would have put one<lb/> | |||
end to all suits. Admitting <del>hired</del> <add>the</add> hireling while the principal remained<lb/> | |||
unexcluded <add>is an arrangement that</add> would have been little less incompetent to the purpose, under the<lb/> | |||
natural system, as hath been seen, it is an arrangement that not infrequently can scarcely be dispensed with.</p> | |||
<p>This stroke, one of the boldest as well as most nefarious <add>flagitious</add> that<lb/> | |||
ever was struck either by fraud or force, could not be struck at once.<lb/> | |||
</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
The A rule principle of natural justice the most obvious perhaps and most irrefragable
of any that ever presented themselves to human reason could
not be battered in breach: it was necessary to undermine it.
Andi alteram partem is an adage, among the most frequent in
use, as well as among the earliest in date. By another maxim
somewhat more extended, the iniquity of the Judge who should presume
to violate the former is denounced to the tribunal of mankind. Qui
statuerit parte inaudlta altera, aequum llce’t statuerit, non æquum
facit. Andi alteram partem – the injustice, the single injustice
comprized in the violation of that rule, was the utmost most flagrant that in that
early stage of human existence improvement and human corruption had presented itself to the imagination
of mankind. By the stroke, the master stroke here in question, before us,
that injustice was doubted. To
13 June 1805
Evidence
§. Excluding principals – admitting which none but hired proxies were admitted
These two arrangements are in effect but counterparts of one and
the same arrangement. Excluding principals without admitting proxies
would not have executed the design but marred it: it would have put one
end to all suits. Admitting hired the hireling while the principal remained
unexcluded is an arrangement that would have been little less incompetent to the purpose, under the
natural system, as hath been seen, it is an arrangement that not infrequently can scarcely be dispensed with.
This stroke, one of the boldest as well as most nefarious flagitious that
ever was struck either by fraud or force, could not be struck at once.
Identifier: | JB/058/394/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1805-06-13 |
1-2 |
||
058 |
evidence |
||
394 |
evidence |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d8 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
19063 |
|||