JB/051/268/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/051/268/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/268/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/268/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head><!-- in pencil -->13</head>
 
<head><!-- in pencil -->Appeal</head>


<p><note><!-- in pencil -->VI <del><gap/></del> Quot 18 Complaints of delay require not a neighbouring Judge any more than Appeals, supposing the facts agreed on: if not, they require a Judge by commission</note> Petitions for expedition, supposing the facts<lb/>
on which the <del>expedition is claimed</del> <add><del>order</del> application is preferred</add> on one side<lb/>
and combated on the other, to be agreed on or<lb/>
ascertained have as little need of a <sic>neigbouring</sic> 
Judge as appeals properly so called: supposing<lb/>
the facts to be in dispute, and consequently <del>fresh</del><lb/>
a necessity for the <del>examination</del> collection of fresh<lb/>
evidence, <add>the establishment of</add> a neighbouring Judge <add>Court</add> of appeal or<lb/>
power of giving <del>a</del> <add>an occasional</add> commission to a <del>neig</del> Judge of<lb/>
<del>an</del> neighbouring Immediate Court is as necessary<lb/>
in this case as in <add>for this purpose as for</add> that of a petition for supplying<lb/>
a gap in evidence.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:53, 22 September 2012

Click Here To Edit

13

Appeal

VI Quot 18 Complaints of delay require not a neighbouring Judge any more than Appeals, supposing the facts agreed on: if not, they require a Judge by commission Petitions for expedition, supposing the facts
on which the expedition is claimed order application is preferred on one side
and combated on the other, to be agreed on or
ascertained have as little need of a neigbouring Judge as appeals properly so called: supposing
the facts to be in dispute, and consequently fresh
a necessity for the examination collection of fresh
evidence, the establishment of a neighbouring Judge Court of appeal or
power of giving a an occasional commission to a neig Judge of
an neighbouring Immediate Court is as necessary
in this case as in for this purpose as for that of a petition for supplying
a gap in evidence.



Identifier: | JB/051/268/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

18-21

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

268

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16433

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in