JB/051/289/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/051/289/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/289/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/289/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<head><!-- in pencil -->13</head>
 
<head><!-- in pencil -->Appeals</head>
 
<p><note><!-- in pencil -->VII Curia para</note> or only once it ought not it <sic>ought not</sic> to be subjected<lb/>
to the delay of a second revision: if two revisions<lb/>
are necessary this will not be rendered unnecessary<lb/>
by the accident of a <sic>mans</sic> having commenced the action<lb/>
in a Court of <del>and</del> more extensive jurisdiction instead<lb/>
of one of a jurisdiction less extensive. True it is<lb/>
that the need of revision will not be <del>al</del> in general<lb/>
quite so great after the decision of a Court of<lb/>
greater responsibility and intelligence such as<lb/>
<add>mine and the Committee's</add> the District Court as after the decision of a Court<lb/>
of less responsibility and intelligence such as my<lb/>
Parochial Court and <add>or</add> the Committee's Canton Court:<lb/>
but the difference does not seem so uniform and<lb/>
decided as to warrant so striking an <sic>anomality</sic><lb/>
as the difference between one and two appeals in<lb/>
the same cause, especially where the second appeal<lb/>
can be given without additional <sic>expence</sic>.</p>





Revision as of 19:30, 7 October 2012

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

13

Appeals

VII Curia para or only once it ought not it ought not to be subjected
to the delay of a second revision: if two revisions
are necessary this will not be rendered unnecessary
by the accident of a mans having commenced the action
in a Court of and more extensive jurisdiction instead
of one of a jurisdiction less extensive. True it is
that the need of revision will not be al in general
quite so great after the decision of a Court of
greater responsibility and intelligence such as
mine and the Committee's the District Court as after the decision of a Court
of less responsibility and intelligence such as my
Parochial Court and or the Committee's Canton Court:
but the difference does not seem so uniform and
decided as to warrant so striking an anomality
as the difference between one and two appeals in
the same cause, especially where the second appeal
can be given without additional expence.




Identifier: | JB/051/289/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

289

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f11 / f12 / f13 / f14

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16454

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in