JB/051/316/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/051/316/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/316/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/051/316/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
C
Of the [purposes] of Procedure
to depend, as it has almost always hitherto been
made to depend upon the pecuniary solvency of the offen-
der. For in general the longer the delay is, the longer time
there is given for the assets to be consumed,
If there be any exception to this rule, there is
... must concur to form it:
the assets must consist solely in the growing produce of the
offenders'  labour: the punishment must be such
as admits of his carrying ... that labour: and
means must be provided for compelling him
so to do.
6. In case of inno
-cence, ground-
less punishment.
6. The case is much worse where the party
suspected and prosecuted actually ... and to
be innocent. In this case the additional quantity of
suffering produced by the delay is
not only superfluous, but fundamentally un-
just and groundless. It is not only in ...
... ..., as is the case when it is simply
superfluous: but it is pernicious in its conse-
quenches: pernicious in virtue of the alarm which
it inspires: similar to the alarm which is
propagated by a crime.
Refer this to jump in case of unusual punishment ... .... Difference between
Difference between alarm of an unjust punishment. ... ... ... .... ...
... Then will come in after the ways in which the
Judge may fail have been considered.


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''

Revision as of 21:59, 23 February 2015

Click Here To Edit


C Of the [purposes] of Procedure

to depend, as it has almost always hitherto been made to depend upon the pecuniary solvency of the offen- der. For in general the longer the delay is, the longer time there is given for the assets to be consumed, If there be any exception to this rule, there is ... must concur to form it: the assets must consist solely in the growing produce of the offenders' labour: the punishment must be such as admits of his carrying ... that labour: and means must be provided for compelling him so to do.

6. In case of inno -cence, ground- less punishment.

6. The case is much worse where the party suspected and prosecuted actually ... and to be innocent. In this case the additional quantity of suffering produced by the delay is not only superfluous, but fundamentally un- just and groundless. It is not only in ... ... ..., as is the case when it is simply superfluous: but it is pernicious in its conse- quenches: pernicious in virtue of the alarm which it inspires: similar to the alarm which is propagated by a crime.

Refer this to jump in case of unusual punishment ... .... Difference between Difference between alarm of an unjust punishment. ... ... ... .... ... ... Then will come in after the ways in which the Judge may fail have been considered.







This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet




Identifier: | JB/051/316/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

19-24, 1-3

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

316

Info in main headings field

of the purposes of procedure

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f17 / f18 / f19 / f20

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::r williams [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

c. hamilton

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16481

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in