JB/075/020/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:10, 19 August 2021

1828 July
Rene Commission Answer

In my enquiry after the object in question I do
not find myself much advanced by this supposed an expression equivalent
By improvement all that I can understand is - better
adapted to the accomplishment of some object or objects
but what this object is or those objects are, in for what on the present occasion no information?
is it in my power to derive from it

Under these circumstances it seems to me that
I can not the better than to submitt it to the consideration of
the Commissioners >Commission what in my view of the matter
in relation to the matter subject of the law of real property
it is "desirable" that these objects should be: the rather,
inasmuch as without such objects having the sort of objects in question before them for their
guidance. It< I can not but think that any persons be
who might find disposed to make recommendations in
relation to the subject in question can not but find themselves
in no small degree at a loss.

Identifier: \| JB/075/020/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 75.
Date_1	1828-07-09	Marginal Summary Numbering	4-5
Box	075	Main Headings	law amendment
Folio number	020	Info in main headings field	real property commission answer
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d4 / e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	24474
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/075/020/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<p><head>1828 July<lb/>
-<head>1528 ??? ?</head><lb/>
+<unclear>Rene</unclear> <gap/> Commission Answer</head></p>
-<head>heading</head>
 <p>In my enquiry after the object in question I do<lb/>
@@ Line 10: / Line 9: @@
 By improvement all that I can understand is - better<lb/>
 adapted to the accomplishment of some object or objects<lb/>
-but <add><gap/> for what in the present occasion</add> what this object is as these objects are, an information?<lb/>
+but what this object is or those objects are, <add><del>in</del> for what on the present occasion</add> no information?<lb/>
-is it a very/any ?? prove to these???? from it<lb/></p>
+is it in my power to derive from it</p>
 <p>Under these circumstances it seems to me that<lb/>
-I can not the better than to release it to the consideration of<lb/>
+I can not the better than to submitt it to the consideration of<lb/>
-the Commissioner <add><unclear>Commission</unclear></add> what in my view of the matter<lb/>
+the Commissioners <add>>Commission</add> what in my view of the matter<lb/>
-in relation to <del><gap/></del> the <add>subject</add> matter of the Law?? of  par??? Krp ??<lb/>
+in relation to <del><gap/></del> the matter <add>subject</add> of the law of real property<lb/>
-it is "desirable" that these objects should be: the ???,<lb/>
+it is "desirable" that these objects should be: the rather,<lb/>
-??? ?? <add>h?? the ?? objects in question</add>put objects before them for  ??<lb/>
+inasmuch as without  <gap/> such objects <add>having the sort of objects in question</add> before them for  their<lb/>
-prudence. <del><unclear>It</unclear></del> I can not let think that any persons be<lb/>
+guidance.  <del>It<</del> I can not but think that any persons be<lb/>
-who might find disp?? to make recommendation?? in<lb/>
+who might find disposed to make recommendations in<lb/>
-relation to the subject in question can not but find ??<lb/>
+relation to the subject in question can not but find themselves<lb/>
-in ?? ?? desire?? at a loss.<lb/></p>
+in no small degree at a loss.</p>

Views

JB/075/020/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:10, 19 August 2021

Navigation

Search