★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
'' | <p><gap/> — <hi rend="underline">without</hi> consent of parties a truth <gap/><lb/>long arrived at by Judges & <gap/> <add>allowed by Law</add> <del.<gap/></del> & <gap/> §.2.c.25.<lb/><foreign><hi rend="underline">Vide</hi></foreign> <unclear>extract</unclear> <hi rend="underline">Wilkes v <unclear>Leases</unclear> 1737</hi> — <foreign>Vide</foreign> also — <unclear>extract</unclear>} N.B.<lb/>from state Facts in <hi rend="underline"><gap/>'s case</hi> & in that of <gap/> Bishop }</p> <p>V In respect <add><gap/></add> of the <gap/> p.2. Many special Juries at the desire of<lb/>either party — <foreign><hi rend="underline">Vide</hi></foreign> King's speech to Parliament 15 <sic>Aug</sic> 1730 —<lb/><del><gap/></del> have not profess of thoughts to which the <gap/><lb/>of the Press — Information received about 50 years before;<lb/><hi rend="underline">and</hi> extract from Bishop <unclear>Basset</unclear> — & now <hi rend="underline">Special Juries</hi><lb/>established — <foreign>Vide</foreign> Lord Lyttleton — <gap/> <sic>v<hi rend="superscript">s</hi></sic> Johnson.</p> <p>VI The <del>mode in which this act is <gap/> <gap/></del> avowed object of the<lb/>Act — & the mode in which it is drawn up —</p> <p>1 the object as declared by Preamble to prevent Corruption in<lb/>Juries in consequence of frequent <gap/. of them</p. <p.2. The object as collected from the <gap/> and <add>thence to</add> <gap/> the <gap/><lb/>of Jurors from the <gap/> — had it <gap/> him so <gap/.</p. <p>3 The enactments with respect to Special Juries inconsistent<lb/>with the <gap/> <gap/> —</p> <p4. These enactments inconsistent with each other. <sic>sec.</sic> 15. "<gap/><lb/>"before the Officer of the Court" <sic>sec.</sic> 17. "struck by the Officer"</p> <p>5 <sic>Sec.</sic> 6. | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
— without consent of parties a truth
long arrived at by Judges & allowed by Law <del. & §.2.c.25.
Vide extract Wilkes v Leases 1737 — Vide also — extract} N.B.
from state Facts in 's case & in that of Bishop }
V In respect of the p.2. Many special Juries at the desire of
either party — Vide King's speech to Parliament 15 Aug 1730 —
have not profess of thoughts to which the
of the Press — Information received about 50 years before;
and extract from Bishop Basset — & now Special Juries
established — Vide Lord Lyttleton — vs Johnson.
VI The mode in which this act is avowed object of the
Act — & the mode in which it is drawn up —
1 the object as declared by Preamble to prevent Corruption in
Juries in consequence of frequent <gap/. of them</p. <p.2. The object as collected from the and thence to the
of Jurors from the — had it him so <gap/.</p.
3 The enactments with respect to Special Juries inconsistent
with the —
<p4. These enactments inconsistent with each other. sec. 15. "
"before the Officer of the Court" sec. 17. "struck by the Officer"
5 Sec. 6.
|
Identifier: | JB/081/013/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1827-10-09 |
|||
|
081 |
petition for justice |
||
|
013 |
|||
|
002 |
|||
|
collectanea |
4 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
c brenchley 1808 |
|||
|
earl of shelburne |
|||
|
1808 |
|||
|
[[notes_public::"9 oct. 1827 is not this lord […?] unless determined by law a […?] many years ago (say 10 or 12) to jb qsp?" [note in bentham's hand]]] |
25800 |
||
