★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829 May 31<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><note><sic>ultiss<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 4<lb/>Supplement</note><lb/>(2) (4 <note>II Elucidation<lb/>§. Reconciliation</note></p> <p><note>5<lb/>Uses of <del>present</del> this<lb/>mention of the institution</note></p> <p>Now as to the <add>uses and</add> purpose for which mention of it has<lb/>here been made. Position indicative of these uses <add>and purposes</add> are the following</p> <!-- next paragraph crossed through in pencil --> <p><del>Positions which on this occasion present themselves as of</del><lb/>In relation to this <del.<gap/.<d/el> so exemplary institution,<lb/>Positions the establishment of which presents itself as<lb/>affording a promise of being of use, <add>are</add> the following</p> <p><note>1 Important services already<lb/><del>mentioned</del> <add>rendered</add> by it.</note></p> <p>1. That, by the <add>actually <del><gap/></del> established</add> institution here in question, extreme and important<lb/>has been the service actually rendered to justice.</p> <p><note>2. <del>The</del> <add>That in this institution</add> Personal appearance of<lb/>parties at the outset, the<lb/>principal feature of<lb/>proposed system has<lb/>been for 25 years in<lb/>practice <del>in this institution</del></note></p> <p>(3)<lb/>2. That <del>it is by means of</del> the personal appearance of parties<lb/>in the presence of the Judge at the outset of the cause, <del>that <gap/></del> <add>an arrangement<lb/>which constitutes the principal feature in the here proposed system is<lb/>the arrangement by which the principal part of the service <del>here</del><lb/>actually done has</add> been rendered: and that for 25 years the arrangement having<lb/>had place in practice upon a national scale, the nonsensical<lb/>cry of <add>theoretical</add> speculation, visionary , is put to <gap/></p> <p><del>3. That <gap/> <add>by</add> this arrangement a sort of <add>the <gap/> of</add> <gap/> good<lb/>effect has been exemplified <gap/> of view</del></p> <p><note>3. <add><del>That</del></add> By <del>this arrangement</del> <add>personal appearance</add><lb/>the beneficial effects<lb/>of the institution produced</note></p> <p>3. That it is <del>f</del> <add>by</add> this arrangement and no other, that the<lb/><del>good p</del> beneficial effects produced by that institution were produced.</p> <p><note><del>4. <add>That</add> Engrafting that institution<lb/>on existing system<lb/>would <add>not</add> produce no good<lb/>effects equal to the adopting<lb/>the new proposed<lb/>system.</del></note></p> <p><note>4. Beneficial effects of proposed<lb/>system greater than would<lb/>be produced by engrafting this<lb/>Danish institution on the existing<lb/>system</note></p> <p>4. That by the engrafting of this institution upon the<lb/>procedure practice and judicial establishment of this country<lb/>(England) <add>even</add> supposing it practicable, no good effects equal to those<lb/><gap/> by the here proposed system could be produced: <del>this<lb/>n</del> the goof effects of that institution <add>abundant as they still are</add> being narrowed by imperfections,<lb/>and counter acted by bad effects, which under<lb/>the here proposed system would not have place.</p> <p><note><del>5 That the same country <add>& government</add><lb/>that has adopted this<lb/>institution has also<lb/><del>5 By De</del><lb/>granted gratuitous<lb/>justice to those unable<lb/>to purchase it</del></note></p> <p><note>5 By Denmark gratuitous<lb/>justice granted to the indigent</note></p> <p>5. That <add>by</add> the same country and go9vernment <del>that</del> by which<lb/>an exemplification has been thus afforded of the production of these<lb/>good effects has also been afforded an example of <add>gratuitous</add> justice<lb/>rendered <del>gratuitously</del> to individuals so circumstanced as<lb/>not to be able to purchase it: and thereby of a government<lb><del>free</del> <add>clear of</add> that reproach with which the government of this country<lb/>(England) is so deeply <add>heavily</add> lauded: the reproach of <add>a mixture of <gap/> and</add> <gap/> of justice<lb/>and that thus, so far as regard <add>in relation</add> to that part of the here proposed<lb?>system which regards the gratuitousness of the <gap/>proposed <lb/>to be rendered by it is<lb/>the abovementioned nonsensical<lb/>cry is also<lb/>put to silence.</p> | |||
Elucidation | |||
Reconciliation | |||
5. | |||
1 | |||
2. That | |||
3. By | |||
4. Beneficial effects of proposed system greater than would be produced by engrafting this | |||
5 | |||
1829 May 31
Petitions
ultisso 4
Supplement
(2) (4 II Elucidation
§. Reconciliation
5
Uses of present this
mention of the institution
Now as to the uses and purpose for which mention of it has
here been made. Position indicative of these uses and purposes are the following
Positions which on this occasion present themselves as of
In relation to this <del.<gap/.<d/el> so exemplary institution,
Positions the establishment of which presents itself as
affording a promise of being of use, are the following
1 Important services already
mentioned rendered by it.
1. That, by the actually established institution here in question, extreme and important
has been the service actually rendered to justice.
2. The That in this institution Personal appearance of
parties at the outset, the
principal feature of
proposed system has
been for 25 years in
practice in this institution
(3)
2. That it is by means of the personal appearance of parties
in the presence of the Judge at the outset of the cause, that an arrangement
which constitutes the principal feature in the here proposed system is
the arrangement by which the principal part of the service here
actually done has been rendered: and that for 25 years the arrangement having
had place in practice upon a national scale, the nonsensical
cry of theoretical speculation, visionary , is put to
3. That by this arrangement a sort of the of good
effect has been exemplified of view
3. That By this arrangement personal appearance
the beneficial effects
of the institution produced
3. That it is f by this arrangement and no other, that the
good p beneficial effects produced by that institution were produced.
4. That Engrafting that institution
on existing system
would not produce no good
effects equal to the adopting
the new proposed
system.
4. Beneficial effects of proposed
system greater than would
be produced by engrafting this
Danish institution on the existing
system
4. That by the engrafting of this institution upon the
procedure practice and judicial establishment of this country
(England) even supposing it practicable, no good effects equal to those
by the here proposed system could be produced: this
n the goof effects of that institution abundant as they still are being narrowed by imperfections,
and counter acted by bad effects, which under
the here proposed system would not have place.
5 That the same country & government
that has adopted this
institution has also5 By De
granted gratuitous
justice to those unable
to purchase it
5 By Denmark gratuitous
justice granted to the indigent
5. That by the same country and go9vernment that by which
an exemplification has been thus afforded of the production of these
good effects has also been afforded an example of gratuitous justice
rendered gratuitously to individuals so circumstanced as
not to be able to purchase it: and thereby of a government<lb>free clear of that reproach with which the government of this country
(England) is so deeply heavily lauded: the reproach of a mixture of and of justice
and that thus, so far as regard in relation to that part of the here proposed<lb?>system which regards the gratuitousness of the proposed
to be rendered by it is
the abovementioned nonsensical
cry is also
put to silence.
Identifier: | JB/081/289/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1829-05-31 |
5 |
||
081 |
petition for justice |
||
289 |
petitions |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c2 / e4 / f4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
street & co |
||
antonio alcala galiano |
|||
26076 |
|||