★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829. April.<lb/> | |||
Petition.<lb/> | |||
Supplements<lb/> | |||
§ 2. Elucidation.<lb/> | |||
History & Aetiology.</head> | |||
<note>33<lb/> | |||
Parliaments conviction<lb/> | |||
of the inaptitude of the<lb/> | |||
regular system proved<lb/> | |||
by employment given<lb/> | |||
to the summary</note> | |||
<p>Instructive, and with a view to practice<lb/> | |||
in the highest degree important, is the certificate<lb/> | |||
we have on this subject — a certificate given by<lb/> | |||
Parliament: a certificate, declarative of the utter<lb/> | |||
inaptitude of the regular course, in all the several so<lb/> | |||
numerous and diversified ramifications of which the<lb/> | |||
<sic>tyger-stuffed</sic> jungle is composed. By Parliament? Yes:<lb/> | |||
by every Parliament, from the very first, by which an<lb/> | |||
exemplification of this summary and solely apt course<lb/> | |||
was given, down to the present. A certificate?<lb/> | |||
says somebody. Where is it? <hi rend="underline">Answer</hi>. Every where.<lb/> | |||
In what words? <hi rend="underline">Answer</hi>. Not in <hi rend="underline">words</hi> but in and<lb/> | |||
by <hi rend="underline">deeds</hi>: proofs, so much more conclusive than<lb/> | |||
it is in the power of <hi rend="underline">words</hi> to be.</p> | |||
<note>☞ For <gap/><lb/> | |||
<gap/><lb/> | |||
p. 10</note><lb/> | |||
<note>34<lb/> | |||
<add><del>Objection</del> <del>If it</del></add> Assertion that where<lb/> | |||
summary made not<lb/> | |||
established by Parliament<lb/> | |||
it is not the most apt<lb/> | |||
made — a fallacy</note> | |||
<head><del>Addendum.</del></head> | |||
<p><del>From p. 9.</del> <add><gap/></add> Suppose now that after admitting that<lb/> | |||
the summary made is most apt in the cases in which<lb/> | |||
by Parliament as above it is established an assertion<lb/> | |||
made by any body is — </p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1829. April.
Petition.
Supplements
§ 2. Elucidation.
History & Aetiology.
33
Parliaments conviction
of the inaptitude of the
regular system proved
by employment given
to the summary
Instructive, and with a view to practice
in the highest degree important, is the certificate
we have on this subject — a certificate given by
Parliament: a certificate, declarative of the utter
inaptitude of the regular course, in all the several so
numerous and diversified ramifications of which the
tyger-stuffed jungle is composed. By Parliament? Yes:
by every Parliament, from the very first, by which an
exemplification of this summary and solely apt course
was given, down to the present. A certificate?
says somebody. Where is it? Answer. Every where.
In what words? Answer. Not in words but in and
by deeds: proofs, so much more conclusive than
it is in the power of words to be.
☞ For
p. 10
34
Objection If it Assertion that where
summary made not
established by Parliament
it is not the most apt
made — a fallacy
Addendum.
From p. 9. Suppose now that after admitting that
the summary made is most apt in the cases in which
by Parliament as above it is established an assertion
made by any body is —
|
Identifier: | JB/081/397/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-04 |
33-34 |
||
|
081 |
petition for justice |
||
|
397 |
petition |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
john flowerdew colls |
1828 |
||
|
1828 |
|||
|
26184 |
|||
